We learned from a little something. We all learned a little

CHAPTER 10 “Yes, but if something happens on earth, there is always a chance to survive. And if something happens in the air, then there is no chance. This idea is very common and absolutely erroneous. First of all, you need to understand that the percentage of survival by itself says little about

Do something, produce something

Do something, produce something The specific function of your subconscious mind is to accumulate experience for later use. This is your I loves to work very much. There are too many people who concentrate on contemplation, postponing for later

Chapter 720: If someone has sexual intercourse with his wife during Ramadan and he does not have anything (to give as expiatory alms), but he is given something, let him atone for this sin.

Chapter 720: If someone has sexual intercourse with his wife during Ramadan and he does not have anything (to give as expiatory alms), but he is given something, let him atone for this sin. 892 (1936). It is reported that Abu Hurairah, may it be

Chapter 827: If a shepherd or a person entrusted with something sees that any sheep is dying or that something may become worthless, (he is allowed) to slaughter it or save that which may deteriorate.

Chapter 827: If a shepherd or a person entrusted with something sees that any sheep is dying or that something may become worthless, (he is allowed) to slaughter it or save that which may deteriorate. 1013 (2304). It is reported that Ka'b bin Malik, may he be pleased with him

We all learned little by little, Something and somehow

Quote from "Eugene Onegin A.S. Pushkin, ch. 1, stanza 5 (1825).

People who... boast of their learning... actually turn out to be very bad students... Imaginary great scientists can say about themselves if they are frank: We all learned little by little, Something and somehow.

Dictionary of winged words. Plutex. 2004

See what "We all learned a little, Something and somehow" in other dictionaries:

From the novel in verse "Eugene Onegin" (1823 1831) by A. S. Pushkin (1799 1837), ch. 1, stanza 5: We all learned little by little, Something and somehow, So education, thank God, It is not surprising for us to shine. Jokingly ironic: about dilenty, shallow ... Dictionary of winged words and expressions

We all learned little by little, something and somehow- wing. sl. Quote from "Eugene Onegin A. S. Pushkin, ch. 1, stanza 5 (1825). ... people who ... boast of their learning ... turn out to be very bad students in reality ... Imaginary great scientists can say about themselves if they are frank: We all studied ... ... Universal additional practical explanatory dictionary by I. Mostitsky

We all learned little by little, Something and somehow, So education, thank God, It is not surprising for us to shine. A. S. Pushkin. Evg. Onig. 1, 5. Cf. Aliquis in omnibus, nullus in singulis. See Not without sin. See the deserted people and Thomas the nobleman ... Michelson's Big Explanatory Phraseological Dictionary (original spelling)

For something and somehow, So education, thank God, It’s not surprising for us to shine. A.S. Pushkin. Evg. Oneg. 1, 5. Cf. Aliquis in omnibus, nullus in singulis. See not without sin. Look at the desertedness and Thomas the nobleman ... Michelson's Big Explanatory Phraseological Dictionary

somehow- I ka / to something = like nibu / d 1) In any way, in any way; anyway. In the village, he will somehow settle down. 2) unfold Not good enough, somehow, carelessly. * We all learned little by little Something and somehow (Pushkin) 3) colloquial. When… … Dictionary of many expressions

AS SOMETHING, AS SOMETHING, adv. 1. In any way, in any way; anyway. In the village, he will somehow settle down. 2. Expand. Not good enough, somehow, carelessly. * We all learned little by little Something and somehow (Pushkin). 3. Unfold… … encyclopedic Dictionary

And somehow, adv. 1. In any way, in any way; anyway. There is nothing to worry about me. My friends will somehow attach me. Saltykov Shchedrin, Poshekhonskaya antiquity. Arseniy Romanovich was in a hurry to somehow adjust the brace. Fedin, ... ... Small Academic Dictionary

Something, etc. (see what 1), places. indefinite. Some object, phenomenon, etc. from a number of similar ones, or it doesn’t matter what object, phenomenon, etc. We all learned little by little Something and somehow, So we will educate, thank God, With us ... ... Small Academic Dictionary

Aphorisms can be divided into two categories: some catch our eye, are remembered and sometimes used when we want to show off wisdom, while others become an integral part of our speech and go into the category of catchphrases. About authorship ... ...

- (1799 1837) Russian poet, writer. Aphorisms, quotes Pushkin Alexander Sergeevich. Biography It is not difficult to despise the court of people, it is impossible to despise one's own court. Backbiting, even without evidence, leaves eternal traces. Critics... ... Consolidated encyclopedia of aphorisms

Books

• Winged words, quotes, aphorisms, Pushkin Alexander Sergeevich. The work of Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin accompanies us all our lives. Quotes from his works and winged expressions, from the textbook "At the seashore, the green oak", crafty" We all studied ...

or "Excuse me, Alexander Sergeevich!"

We all learned a little
Something and somehow.
There is a certificate - and thank God!
Without gold - do not blame me.
Teaching is not a children's holiday.
And besides, you were a prankster.
And yet, the teachers' council decided
That you are smart and very nice.
You had no desire to rummage
In academic dust
And yet, you were not bypassed
Teachers with their care
And you from the school porch
Went down with the air of a sage.

Where, where did you go,
Those school years are golden days!
Oh, how we had fun
And only bitter - no, no!
I don't believe it's time
Swallow the slow Leta,
Though a wakeful breguet
Natikal us for many years.
It cannot be said that in these summers
We haven't heard of love
Young blood seethed in us,
And we walked - no doubt,
But for study and with us
There was a free hour.

Every day we don't protest
For knowledge they renewed the path,
And in the distance I feel the exam,
Trying to learn somehow...
Sometimes it was hard
And we hoped for a friend
Who quickly decided everything ...
That once and you sinned.
When the sea overflowed
Concepts in the gloomy brain,
We fled together in the taiga
And there they walked in the open,
Where everyone, breathing freely,
Ready to do an antrasha.

In the evening, all in one tent
They came in in a noisy crowd...
And not to say that they slept sweetly,
But still, a tarpaulin over your head -
Not a gloomy night sky
Besides, no one was crushed,
At least someone had a dream
That he should be the killer.
He was not allowed to become a murderer ...
So that the child does not suffer,
They woke him up not jokingly,
And everyone was laughing at the same time.
But laughing heartily
The knives were hidden away.

Already the sky was breathing in autumn ...
And we rushed to the fields.
We have a lot of potatoes
Thila in the bowels of mother earth.
Reins fluffy exploding,
Our labor team
Digging in the ground all day.
Meshkov mysterious canopy
Filled with a merry thud…
What the earth could hide
Found a teacher
And they got to the bottom. was approaching
For us, the desired time
Merry dancing around the fire ...

We all read Onegin,
At least the first line
Although many preferred
enjoy the breeze
Behind the walls of your favorite school.
But still, one merry day
It was placed on the stage.
Onegin was sharp, but nice.
Tatyana was a match for him ...
Although in life there was a girl
Always carelessly cheerful
But she entered the role zealously.
And was a reward for all
A well-deserved success.

Our teacher had honest rules,
Although he could not be an uncle ...
He made us all learn
More precisely, she ... And, God knows,
Her example is science to others.
Boredom was unknown to us.
We could talk to her
And about love, and about hockey.
And everyone tried to express -
Of which I am slightly aware
What is sophisticated and what is strong.
And if someone expressed
Not good about CSKA
The board was waiting for him.

And so, parted beyond the threshold,
And there are other frontiers.
Years flew by. In a strict rhythm
A measured life flowed ...
Time has changed our faces...
But if someone looks
He knows everyone easily...
We were young then.
Then they went to work
Salted mushrooms for the winter
Met the tricks of fate
At the same time, they created something
We got together, we broke up again...
And yet, they believed in love.

And we met in this room.
Teachers, students...
And everyone told each other
After all, this is not for you at the blackboard ...
The school hall is full, the boxes are shining,
Everyone rejoices and applauds,
And someone who is late
Crawls between the chairs on the legs ...
All post-school merit,
All degrees and all ranks
Discarded and not needed.
Friends we are friends again.
And we are more pleasant and dear
Things of bygone days.

Reviews

Lol you made it! AC nervously bites his nails (sorry, AC, blasphemous).
Light, in the order of friendly criticism: everything is so clean and great, you just can’t tear yourself away, but here’s the line “Everything I was aware of” ......... well, it hurts the ear ........ think, but?

"We all learned a little something and somehow." This legendary quote from the first chapter of "Eugene Onegin" is familiar to all of us literally from school.

But, I think, neither we, nor even Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin himself - a recognized classic, a legend and pride of Russian culture - could not have imagined that at the beginning of the 21st century this phrase would begin to reflect the content of school education in literature. Unfortunately, in 2012 such times have come. Coincidentally or not, but they coincided with the arrival in May last year of the new head of the department, Dmitry Livanov, at the Ministry of Education.

School reform, as you know, involves the introduction of new educational standards. These are quite complex documents, in which a lot of details are spelled out. It is quite difficult for a non-specialist to understand them.

However, there are things that any thinking person who studied at school can appreciate. One of them is the content of literature programs. We all understand, let's say that the lessons should not study unknown works written by obscenities. Or, excuse me, savoring physiological details, let's say, of various kinds of actions. We just don't want students to read that. For the simple reason that they are children.

The striking fact, however, is that such "reading" is henceforth recommended by the "heads of education", headed by Dmitry Livanov, as part of the school curriculum.

Moreover, we note, not as an additional reading, but instead of the recognized classics of Russian literature, which is known and loved by millions of people.

Indeed, this is hard to believe. But facts, as you know, are pretty stubborn things. Before our eyes, under the guise of the Ministry of Education, there is going on a primitivization of children's ideas about Russian literature, terrible in its senselessness. Moreover, it is taking place under the banner of "school reform", designed, it would seem, to improve the situation in the school.

Almost everyone who makes up the golden fund of Russian culture turned out to be "circumcised". These are the authors whose works are studied and known all over the world.

Thus, the study of the work of Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin has been reduced. The Bronze Horseman is no longer part of the compulsory school curriculum that most schools will inevitably choose. It was left only on an advanced course, i.e. for the "elite". Apparently, it is believed that the rest of you do not need to get acquainted with this great work.

The same fate befell the works of Anton Pavlovich Chekhov. At a basic level (i.e. "for everyone"), children should no longer read either "The Man in the Case" or "The Lady with the Dog".

They did not spare Nikolai Vasilyevich Gogol with his "Petersburg Tales" either; and Isaac Emmanuilovich Babel with his Odessa Stories. And Sholokhov's "Quiet Don" is supposed to be studied only in the form of separate chapters.

Alas, that's not all. If the great authors of the nineteenth century were only subjected to reduction, then the literature of the twentieth century, in a fit of administrative delight "masters of education" was "rethought" much more radically.

Some famous authors who have become a legend for entire generations are completely deleted even from the "advanced" course. Among them are the poetry of Bella Akhmadulina, Vladimir Vysotsky, Bulat Okudzhava. Not in the compulsory course and Alexei Tolstoy, and the prose of many other recognized writers.

The question arises: for what? For the sake of what "engineers of human souls" and their "great creations" did the Ministry of Education allow such a "cut off" the school curriculum?!

The list of these "classics" included, for example, Yu. Rytkheu, A. Eppel, A. Gladilin, A. Terekhov.

I would venture to suggest that most parents are unaware that some works, in addition to lacking any clear reason for inclusion in the educational program, are replete with obscene language, pornographic scenes and drug propaganda. For example, the works of V. Pelevin - the author of the well-known, but clearly not corresponding to the level of cultural development of 15-17-year-olds, much less the needs of the school.

However, it is precisely these works, according to the Ministry and the Academy of Education, that from now on can be read aloud and discussed by minor teenagers within the walls of schools! It is on them that our children should learn!

For this (and, I emphasize, exclusively for this) reason, I will give here only one excerpt from the work of the aforementioned A. Eppel. At the same time, contrary to tradition, I (and not the author of the book that should now be read at school) will still put ellipsis in some places. I assure you - in the original, letters were written in the place of these points. So:

"... The summer street is bright and sunny, and behind another barn the boys are mating rabbits. The girls deliberately crowd in the distance, but still they see how the rabbit, who was concentrating on nibbling the grass next to the rabbit, at some second rises on the rabbit, someone from eared animals squeals sharply, and both, wiggling their noses, immediately begin to feed. The boys now and then state that the rabbits are e ... I. The girls, looking from afar, also know what the rabbits are doing, but the word e ... I don’t Insolent boys, wanting to draw the attention of girls, make a ring out of two fingers of their left hand and, putting the index finger of their right hand into this ring, move it back and forth ... ".

For what reason do such works (and this is just one example - there are, alas, much more of them) even fall into the school curriculum ?! Can you imagine how it will be read and analyzed in the classroom?! And most importantly - why?

It is interesting to know whether minister Livanov and his subordinates read these works. If not, then why did such an unknown work get into the school curriculum? After all, by definition there should be only classics: those whose works have been tested by time and appreciated by society.

The problem of the new standard of the school literature course is by no means reduced to fragments of obscene texts that, due to an oversight or out of a desire to "reform education to the fullest extent," fell into the hands of children.

The new program radically - by 1.5 times - reduces the number of hours of teaching literature in two senior grades of the school. At the same time, by reducing the time allotted for the study of the work of truly recognized classics, it sharply increased the number of little-known authors. As a result, the volume of classes allotted for the study of the work of each domestic writer on the list decreased by about 2 times. This, according to the idea of ​​the ideologues of this "reform", is apparently just enough to read aloud and discuss in class a passage similar to the one above.

A lot of protests in the pedagogical community were also caused by the unification of two subjects into a single subject: "Russian language" and "literature". This also creates a number of unexpected, but no less real problems.

On the one hand, the professional community is already pointing out the lack of sufficient correlation of the program with the content of the Unified State Examination in terms of the subject "Russian Language and Literature". This means that students will simply face difficulties when passing the exam: with all the ensuing consequences for their admission, for example, to a university.

On the other hand, experts understand that within the framework of a single subject, teachers will be forced to reduce even the hours allotted for literature reduced by the program: simply in order to devote more time to the Russian language. After all, the exam on it, unlike literature, is mandatory. And it is by the results of this exam that both the success of the students and their own work are judged. As a result, students will gradually stop studying literature in general.

Finally, the legal status of this bibliography, which is incomprehensible to the majority, creates confusion. In fact, in the subject "Russian Language and Literature" there is no list of authors and works - either in the standard itself or in any other document officially issued by the ministry. It is taken out from there in the "Exemplary curriculum of the subject", which is developed and recommended by the Russian Academy of Education (RAO).

Thus, the list of recommended authors and works may be subject to regular adjustments by some representatives of the Russian Academy of Education: absolutely without public control and with the full connivance of the Ministry of Education and Science. Which now, obviously, considers that it no longer bears responsibility for the content of education.

Of course, after all of the above, I really want to shout: "The author!"

It is clear that the list of references for senior classes was compiled with little or no extensive consultation with the professional community. Otherwise, he simply would not have passed.

More recently, Mr. Lanin presented himself as a representative of the "creative class" and the opposition. Many people remember his interview with the Voice of America radio station: “What is the purpose of critical thinking under the reigning vertical of power? To critically comprehend the vertical of power and bring it into an uncritically lying horizontal? they were utterly patriotic."

Many other "ideas" were put forward in that interview as well. For example - that it is not worth allocating money for excursions of schoolchildren to the battlefields of the Great Patriotic War, because "after 70 years this is not the most relevant thing for raising children."

God be with him, with Mr. Lanin. It's not about him. He will probably go to America one day, and he will get a very good job there, lecturing about the shortcomings of Russia.

We need to understand why education officials allowed a person who was foaming at the mouth to criticize the supposedly existing problems of the power vertical, immediately began to implement these very own statements: "It is necessary that children be moderately educated. The most important thing is that they be insignificant patriotically raised.

We need to understand and fix this clearly misbehaving system. The mistakes or crimes of some "scholarship recipient" should not call into question the education of millions of children. This simply shouldn't happen.

After all, no strategic documents or requirements force Minister Livanov to promote the ideas of such a "literary reform." It is significant that even in a recent Presidential Address, Vladimir Putin urged "not to forget about the great importance of the quality of teaching the Russian language, history, literature, the foundations of secular ethics and traditional religions." Pay attention - the Russian language and literature in this quote stand separately: nothing indicates their combination into a single subject.

And there were already plenty of signals of public dissatisfaction with such a "literary policy". Suffice it to mention at least the recent speech in the State Duma by Sergei Mironov, who, demonstrating to his colleagues a collection of works recommended for study in schools, called for the resignation of the Minister of Education, literally stating: "We need to end this Lebanese thing."

It is hard to believe that the minister shares the views of the people who proposed introducing obscene language and scenes into the school curriculum that go far beyond the word "erotic". It is much more true that he simply does not consider it necessary to deal with such problems. The ministry is more interested in much more "loud" or "monetary" issues: where it is possible to lobby for something, to distribute orders. And what is happening in the silence of the classes does not particularly bother the educational authorities. Defending Gogol and Vysotsky does not earn many political points.

But still I would like to remind him that it is already too late to refer to ignorance or that "Fursenko has beguiled": almost a year has passed. That not for loud statements "on the box", but precisely for what and how our children are taught in the lessons, the society provided him with a position and pays a ministerial salary.

All of the above gives reason to think about Sergei Mironov's proposal about the fate of the ministry and its head minister. For schoolchildren can freely get acquainted with this kind of literature by watching porn films and reading the inscriptions on the fences.

We all learned a little, / Something and somehow
From the novel in verse "Eugene Onegin" (1823-1831) by A. S. Pushkin (1799-1837), ch. 1, stanza 5:
We all learned a little
Something and somehow
So education, thank God,
It's easy for us to shine.
Jokingly ironic: about dilentatism, shallow, superficial knowledge in any area.

Encyclopedic Dictionary of winged words and expressions. - M.: "Lokid-Press". Vadim Serov. 2003 .

See what "We all learned a little, / Something and somehow" in other dictionaries:

Quote from Eugene Onegin A.S. Pushkin, ch. 1, stanza 5 (1825). ... people who ... boast of their learning ... turn out to be very bad students in reality ... Imaginary great scientists can say about themselves if they are frank: We all studied ... ... Dictionary of winged words and expressions

We all learned little by little, something and somehow- wing. sl. Quote from "Eugene Onegin A. S. Pushkin, ch. 1, stanza 5 (1825). ... people who ... boast of their learning ... turn out to be very bad students in reality ... Imaginary great scientists can say about themselves if they are frank: We all studied ... ... Universal additional practical explanatory dictionary by I. Mostitsky

We all learned little by little, Something and somehow, So education, thank God, It is not surprising for us to shine. A. S. Pushkin. Evg. Onig. 1, 5. Cf. Aliquis in omnibus, nullus in singulis. See Not without sin. See the deserted people and Thomas the nobleman ... Michelson's Big Explanatory Phraseological Dictionary (original spelling)

For something and somehow, So education, thank God, It’s not surprising for us to shine. A.S. Pushkin. Evg. Oneg. 1, 5. Cf. Aliquis in omnibus, nullus in singulis. See not without sin. Look at the desertedness and Thomas the nobleman ... Michelson's Big Explanatory Phraseological Dictionary

somehow- I ka / to something = like nibu / d 1) In any way, in any way; anyway. In the village, he will somehow settle down. 2) unfold Not good enough, somehow, carelessly. * We all learned little by little Something and somehow (Pushkin) 3) colloquial. When… … Dictionary of many expressions

AS SOMETHING, AS SOMETHING, adv. 1. In any way, in any way; anyway. In the village, he will somehow settle down. 2. Expand. Not good enough, somehow, carelessly. * We all learned little by little Something and somehow (Pushkin). 3. Unfold… … encyclopedic Dictionary

And somehow, adv. 1. In any way, in any way; anyway. There is nothing to worry about me. My friends will somehow attach me. Saltykov Shchedrin, Poshekhonskaya antiquity. Arseniy Romanovich was in a hurry to somehow adjust the brace. Fedin, ... ... Small Academic Dictionary

Something, etc. (see what 1), places. indefinite. Some object, phenomenon, etc. from a number of similar ones, or it doesn’t matter what object, phenomenon, etc. We all learned little by little Something and somehow, So we will educate, thank God, With us ... ... Small Academic Dictionary

Aphorisms can be divided into two categories: some catch our eye, are remembered and sometimes used when we want to show off wisdom, while others become an integral part of our speech and go into the category of catchphrases. About authorship ... ...

- (1799 1837) Russian poet, writer. Aphorisms, quotes Pushkin Alexander Sergeevich. Biography It is not difficult to despise the court of people, it is impossible to despise one's own court. Backbiting, even without evidence, leaves eternal traces. Critics... ... Consolidated encyclopedia of aphorisms