Open
Close

Shepherd and teacher. Confessor of the Royal Family

…;">Coming: village Kobylnya 54 yards, 201 souls men. gender and 210 female souls. semi,

in the village of Knyazevskie settlements there are 40 households, 132 men’s souls. gender and 147 female souls. semi,

in the village of Khupta Kobylskie settlements there are 29 households, 116 male souls. sex and 122 souls of women. semi,

in the village of Matveevskie settlements there are 18 households, 67 male souls. gender and 53 female souls. semi,

in the village of Strelcha there are 16 households, 84 male souls. sex and 72 souls of women. semi.

A total of 160 households, 630 men's souls. gender and 604 souls of women. half parishioners, all Orthodox.

Trinity Church in Lubyanka

The building is real stone, the ceiling and dome are wooden. The bell tower is also made of stone.

In 1909 /…/ was corrected inside and the entire inside was painted with oil paint. The church is warm.

There are 3 thrones: in the present one - in the Name of the Most Holy Trinity, the 2nd - in honor of the Kazan Icon of the Mother of God, the 3rd - in honor of the Holy Silverless Cosmas and Damian.

There are enough utensils.

There is no salary.

Other sources of income: bank notes, from them % = 98 rubles. - cop. in year.

Church land: estate with graveyard together 4 des. 1200 sq. fathoms, /…/ arable 78 des. 1200 sq. fathoms, 1-2 versts from the church, there is a plan.

The quality of the land is average, most people use it themselves, some they rent out for 10 rubles each. per ten per year.

The priest's house is on church land, built with insurance money, the property of the church. The deacon and psalmist have their own houses, located on church land. The houses are new, iron roofed.

Other buildings: a wooden gatehouse with an iron roof, built in 1912.

From the consistory 120 versts, from the deanery in Turov 7.

From Ryazhsk 23 versts, from the Kenzino railway station 9.

Nearest churches: Nikolskaya in Kobylnya, 3 versts away, and Znamenskaya village. Rattlers at 4.

There are no affiliations.

Inventory of property from 1884, receipt and expenditure books from 1913, copies of birth certificates from 1804, search book from 1913, 11 sheets written, confessions from 1820.

The church library has 140 volumes of books.

There are schools in the parish: zemstvo in Lubyanka, zemstvo in Baranovka, zemstvo in Akseni.

The peasant Semyon Grigoriev Suetin has been the headman of the church since 1914, on the 1st three-year anniversary.

The Reverend visited for the last time in 1887.

Clergy:

  • Priest Grigory Vasiliev Melioransky 43 years old,
  • Deacon Ioann Evfimiev Favorov, 49 years old,
  • psalmist Alexey Borisov Troitsky 72 years old. /…/

Coming: Lubyanka village 151 yards, 461 souls men. gender and 479 female souls. semi,

in the village of Baranovka there are 118 households, 362 male souls. gender and 360 female souls. semi,

in the village of Akseni there are 39 households, 110 male souls. gender and 117 female souls. semi,

in the village of Saltykovskie Vyselki there are 16 courtyards, 50 male souls. gender and 49 female souls. semi.

A total of 324 households, 983 male souls. gender and 1005 female souls. half parishioners, all Orthodox.

In schism, sectarians, Mohammedans, Jews, etc. - No.

Archangel Church in Mordvinovka

Built in 1896 by the diligence of good people.

The building is real wooden, covered with iron, the bell tower is wooden, covered with iron.

Thrones 3: in the present - in the Name of the Archangel Michael of God, to the right - St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, to the left the chapel - in the Name of Saints Peter, Alexy, Jonah and Philip of Moscow Wonderworkers.

There are enough utensils.

Staff: priest and psalm-reader. On the face - the same.

Salary 392 rubles. for two.

Club fees: 300 rub. cop. -

Other sources of income: bank notes, % from them = (not calculated - approx.).

Church land: estate with graveyard together 5 des., /…/ arable 33 des. and under the country road 1 des. 2 miles from the church, there is a plan.

The quality of the land is average, partly infertile, income 300 rubles. in year.

The houses of the clergy on church land, built with diligence themselves and constitute their property, are in average condition.

Other buildings: parochial school at the village. Mordvinovka and the parish school at the village of Lyapunovka.

From the consistory at 110 versts, from the deanery in Turov at 8.

From Ryazhsk 20 versts, from the Kenzino railway station 4.

Address: "p/o Ukholovo, Ryazan province."

The nearest churches are: Nikolskaya in Churilovka at 2 versts and Pokrovskaya in Kenzino at 3.

There are no affiliations.

Inventory of property from 1878, receipts and expenditure books from 1877, copies of birth certificates from 1780, search book from 1912, 17 sheets written, confessions from 1827.

There are 50 volumes of books in the church library.

Church money and papers are safe behind the key, the key is with the elder.

There are schools in the parish: a parish school in Mordvinovka, a two-room school and a one-room school in Lyapunovka. Placed in church houses, released from parishioners and from the Ryazhsky district branch of 114 rubles. per year, 60 boys and 50 girls study.

The church elder is a peasant from the village. Mordvinovka Emelyan Shaposhnikov since 1895, for three years.

The Reverend last visited in 1914.

Clergy:

  • Priest Dimitry Ioannov Pesochin 27 years old,
  • and/or psalmist Fyodor Ioannov Chilin 22 years old. /…/

Coming: village of Mordvinovka 129 households, 362 souls men. gender and 414 female souls. semi,

in the village of Lyapunova there are 77 households, 241 male souls. gender and 218 female souls. semi,

in the village of Elagin Khutor there are 21 yards, 59 male showers. gender and 66 female souls. semi.

A total of 227 households, 662 men's souls. gender and 698 female souls. half parishioners, all Orthodox.

In schism, sectarians, Mohammedans, Jews, etc. - No.

Nicholas Church in Mostje

Built in 1884-1900. through the diligence of parishioners and other benefactors, it was consecrated in 1901.

The building is real stone, with the same bell tower, warm, strong, covered with iron.

Thrones 3: the main one - in the name of St. Nicholas the Wonderworker,

2) on the right side - in the name of St. Sergius of Radonezh,

3) on the left side - in the name of St. Martyr John the Warrior.

There are enough utensils.

Staff: priest, deacon and psalm-reader. On the face - the same.

There is no salary.

Club fees: 480 rub. - cop.

Other sources of income: bank notes, from them % = 64 rubles. 55 kopecks in year.

Church land: estate with graveyard together 4 dessiatinas, /…/ arable land 40 dessiatinas, 200 fathoms from the church, there is a plan.

The quality of the land is average, partly infertile, income 180 rubles. in year.

The houses of the clergy on church land were built with the care of the clergy themselves, their own.

The house is in good condition. The psalm-reader does not have a home.

Other buildings: stone church gatehouse, covered with iron.

From the consistory 115 versts, from the deanery in Turov 20.

From Ryazhsk 30 versts, from the Sukharevo railway station of the Syzran-Vyazemskaya railway 4.

Address: "p/o Ukholovo, Ryazan province."

The nearest churches are: Voskresenskaya in Dubrovka at 1 verst and Kazanskaya in Serbino at 3, Trinity in Ukholovo at 5 versts.

There are no affiliations.

Inventory of property since 1884, receipt and expense books since 1913, copies of metrics since 1872, except for the years 1785, 1786, 1790 and 1890, search book since 1912, 14 sheets written, confessions since 1826.

There are 5 volumes of books in the church library.

Church money and papers are safe behind the key, the key is with the elder.

There are schools in the parish: zemstvo in the village. Mostier and the parish church in Butyrki.

In the village itself, a parochial school was built on purchased land, 390 rubles are allocated for maintenance from the Ryazhsky district branch of the Ryazan Diocesan School Council, 29 boys and 22 girls are educated.

The Sapozhkov tradesman Ioann Grigoriev Krom has been the headman of the church since 1909, for three years.

The Reverend last visited in - year.

Clergy:

  • Sacred Cosma Feofanov Nazarev 39 years old,
  • Deacon Mikhail Mikhailov Lebedev 56 years old,
  • psalmist - (there is no psalmist). /…/

Coming: Mostye village 96 households, 273 souls men. gender and 277 female souls. semi,

in the village of Kairovoy there are 13 households, 54 male souls. gender and 39 female souls. semi,

in the village of Otrada there are 40 households, 108 male souls. gender and 118 female souls. semi,

in the village of Alexandrovka there are 16 courtyards, 69 men’s showers. gender and 67 female souls. semi,

in the village of Satin there are 13 households, 53 men's souls. floor and 60 women's households. semi,

in the village of Butyrki there are 114 households, 353 male souls. gender and 369 female souls. semi,

in the village of Isavshchina there are 20 households, 79 male souls. sex and 84 souls of women. semi.

A total of 312 households, 989 male souls. gender and 1014 female souls. half parishioners, all Orthodox.

In schism, sectarians, Mohammedans, Jews, etc. - No.

Archangel Church in Pogorelovka

Built in 1869 through the diligence of parishioners and various benefactors.

The building is real wooden, on a brick foundation, the bell tower is the same. The inside is plastered, painted, its dome is covered with planks, outside both the church and the bell tower are covered with planks and painted.

Thrones 3: in the present – ​​1) in the Name of the Archangel of God Michael,

2) Nativity of John the Baptist,

3) Great Martyr Theodore Tiron.

There are enough utensils.

Staff: priest, psalm-reader. On the face - the same.

Salary 400 rubles. in year.

Club fees: 400 rub. - cop.

Other sources of income: bank notes, from them % = 60 rubles. - cop. in year.

Church land: estate with graveyard together 4 des. 500 sq. m. fathoms, /…/ arable 31 des. 304 sq. fathoms, ½ verst from the church, in addition, 440 fathoms is located under a country road. There is a plan.

The quality of the land is small black soil, income is 10-15 rubles. per year from tithe.

The houses of the clergy on church land, built with the diligence of the priest and psalm-reader in 1890, are their own. The houses are strong.

Other church buildings:

1) wooden, iron-roofed parish school building,

2) a new stone, iron-roofed building for the parochial school,

3) a stone (brick) iron-roofed building for a church gatehouse.

From the consistory 100 versts, from the deanery in Turov 20.

From Ryazhsk 27 versts, from the railway station - .

Address: "p/o Ukholovo, Ryazan province."

The nearest churches are: Trinity in Ukholovo, 3 versts, and Pokrovskaya in Kenzin, 6 versts away.

There are no affiliations.

Inventory of property from 1878, receipts and expenditure books from 1912, copies of birth certificates from 1812, search book from 1911, 32 sheets written, confessions from 1826.

There are 10 volumes of books in the church library.

Church money and papers are safe behind the key, the key is with the elder.

The parish has a school: a one-class, two-room parochial school.

In the village itself, there is a school in its own church house, for the maintenance of the parish school, funds from local peasants are 50 rubles from the Ryazhsky district department, 100 rubles, 45 boys and 23 girls are studying.

The Ryazhian merchant of the 2nd guild, Akim Mitrofanov Proshlyakov, has been the headman of the church since 1899.

The Reverend last visited in 1878.

Clergy:

  • Priest John Georgiev Karinsky 65 years old,
  • Psalmist Stefan Nikolaev Solotchin 40 years old. /…/

Parish: Pogorelovka village 106 households, 324 male and 334 female souls,

in the village of Kakuy there are 31 yards, 99 male and 105 female souls,

in the village of Kakuyskiye settlement there are 18 households, 50 males and 60 females,

in the village of Slobodka Ganilovka there are 13 households, 40 males and 48 females.

A total of 169 households, 518 souls (husbands) and 557 souls (wives) half parishioners, all Orthodox.

In schism, sectarians, Mohammedans, Jews, etc. - No.

Church of the Intercession in the village of Pokrovskoye

It was built in 1789 with the diligence of the landowner Fyodor Matveev Leontiev, and the side-altar by dismantling the old cramped one in 1890, built at the expense of the landowner Alexandra Nikolaevna Dubrovina and benefactors of the parishioners, consecrated in 1893.

The building is real stone, on a stone foundation, with the same bell tower, strong, everything is covered with iron.

Thrones 3: in the present - in the Name of the Intercession Ave. Theotokos, and in the chapel there are two - in the Name of the Nativity of John the Baptist and St. Nicholas the Wonderworker of Myra.

There are enough utensils.

Staff: 2 priests, a deacon and 2 psalm-readers. On the face - the same.

There is no salary.

Club fees: about 2000 rubles.

Other sources of income: income from land 600 rubles per year.

Church land: estate with graveyard together 10 dessiatinas. approximately /…/ arable 65 des. 350 sq. fathoms, no haymaking, no plan, 2 ½ versts from the church.

The quality of the land is sandy loam, income is 10 rubles. per year from tithe.

The houses of the clergy on church land were built with their care. The houses require renovation.

Other buildings: a woodshed, a brick church gatehouse with an iron roof and a parish school, brick and iron roof.

From the consistory 100 versts, from the deanery in Turov 30.

From Ryazhsk 33 versts, from the railway station - .

Address: "p/o Ukholovo, Ryazan province."

Nearest churches: the village of Tolstykh Olkhov Pokrovskaya is 5 versts away and the village of Yasenok Pokrovskaya is 8 versts away.

There are no affiliations.

Inventory of property from 1878, receipts and expenditure books from 1910, copies of birth certificates from 1783, search book from 1911, 162 sheets written, confessions from 1826, except 1895.

There are 132 volumes of books in the church library.

Church money and papers are safe behind the key, the key is with the elder.

There are schools in the parish: a parish school in the village, in the church fence, and zemstvo schools in the village. Pokrovsky, and the other in the village of Solovachevo.

In Pokrovsky itself, there is a school in the house of church trusteeship, 103 rubles are allocated from local peasants for the maintenance of the parish school, and 780 rubles are allocated from the Ryazhsky district department for the maintenance of teachers, 87 boys and 29 girls are studying, a total of 116 students.

Ryazhian tradesman Vasily Evsigneev Popov has been the headman of the church since 1896, for three years.

The Reverend last visited in 1874.

Clergy:

  • Archpriest Nikolai Alekseev Sabchakov 76 years old,
  • priest John Georgiev Tverdov 38 years old,
  • Deacon Sergiy Dimitriev Antipatrov 45 years old,
  • psalmist Vasily Petrov Arkhangelsky 54 years old,
  • psalmist Alexander Ivanov Arkhangelsky 22 years old. /…/

Coming: Pokrovskoye village 545 households, 2056 male and 2158 female females,

in the village of Solovacheva there are 81 courtyards, 298 male and 325 female souls.

A total of 626 households, 2354 souls (husbands) and 2483 souls (wives) half parishioners, all Orthodox.

Baptists – 2 (2+1). In schism, sectarians, Mohammedans, Jews, etc. - No.

Kazan Church in Serbin

Built in 1794 with the care of the landowner Agafya Onsiforova Serbina.

The building is made of stone, on a stone foundation, with the same bell tower in connection, strong, covered with iron.

Thrones 3: the main cold one - in the Name of the “Kazan Mother of God”, in the right aisle - St. Nicholas, on the left - “All Saints”.

The utensils are poor.

Staff: priest, psalm-reader and prosphora maker. On the face - the same.

Salary 400 rubles. on parch.

Club fees: 287 rub. - cop.

Other sources of income: income from renting land... (not filled in completely - approx.).

Church land: estate with graveyard together des - square sazh, /.../ arable 30 dessiatinas, - of which 3 dessiatinas are swamps, 100 sazhens from the church.

The quality of the land is average, partly infertile, the so-called bel (salt marsh). Processed by the clergy members themselves.

The houses of the clergy on the field land were built with the care of the clergy in 1903. The houses are in good condition.

Other buildings: parish school, wooden, built in 1900.

From the consistory 120 versts, from the deanery in Turovo 25.

From Ryazhsk 30 versts, from the railway station 5.

Address: "p/o Ukholovo, Ryazan province."

Current page: 1 (book has 23 pages total) [available reading passage: 16 pages]

Vyacheslav Marchenko, Richard (Thomas) Batts
Confessor of the royal family. Archbishop Theophan of Poltava, New Recluse (1873–1940)

This publication is published in the year of the seventieth anniversary of the blessed death of Archbishop Theophan the New Recluse.

The first edition was published in 1994 with the blessing of Metropolitan of St. Petersburg and Ladoga John (Snychev)

Biography of Archbishop Feofan of Poltava (Bystrov)

Blessed are you when they revile you and persecute you and slander you in every way unjustly because of Me.

(Matt. 5:11)

Be faithful until death

and I will give you the crown of life.

(Apoc. 2, 10)

Preface to the first edition. Archbishop Theophan of Poltava – Defender of Orthodoxy

The great Saint and spiritual writer Theophan the Recluse had many readers who wanted to live like a Christian, following his teaching. But there were few true followers who were fully receptive to the acquisition of the Holy Spirit.

One of the rare recipients of a genuine inheritance was the modest bearer of his name ~ Feofan (Bistrov), Archbishop of Poltava, later of Bulgaria, who died as a recluse in the caves of France. His spiritual appearance is in many ways reminiscent of his namesake, the great recluse Feofan Vyshensky († 1894), and although historical whirlwinds carried him beyond the borders of Russia, his place in Russian hagiography of the 20th century is nevertheless noticeable and significant. The enemies of Archbishop Theophan the New Recluse tried to destroy the memory of him, but the lamp of God, even in hiding, will shine with the grace of God; such a great ascetic cannot be hidden, and his memory only grows stronger every year.

The significance of Archbishop Theophan of Poltava, who was the confessor of the Royal Family, one of the greatest theologians of his time and a humble representative of the crucified Holy Rus', lies primarily in standing for the purity of Orthodoxy. Despite the temptations of our age, despite the historical changes in the psychology of the Russian people, Bishop Theophan grows in our memory every year as a true Father of the Church.

Archbishop Feofan (Bystrov)


The theological works of Archbishop Feofan have not been sufficiently studied and remain hidden. His contribution to the treasury of Orthodox patristics has hitherto been known only in

two areas: firstly, ~ the defense of the Cross of the Lord, that is, the Orthodox teaching on the dogma of the Redemption, from the innovation of Metropolitan Anthony (Khrapovitsky); and, secondly, ~ his criticism of the Sophianism of Father Sergius Bulgakov. If history is destined to continue, the spiritual image of Archbishop Theophan of Poltava will be universally glorified. If the end of the world is not far off, then the teachings of Bishop Theophan will be support for enduring the coming trials.

The biography of Bishop Theophan was compiled on the basis of the records of his four students and cell attendants: Archbishops Averky of Syracuse († 1976) and Joasaph of Canada († 1955) and younger cell attendants - Sevryugin and Chernov (the now living schemamonk Epiphanius). At our insistence, Archbishop Averky compiled and published a biography, as well as letters written by Vladyka, mostly to himself. Chernov drew up a great work for us, but included in it a lot of extraneous things that are not directly related to the main goal - to show the general appearance of a righteous man, a confessor of true Orthodoxy. But the main “culprit” for the publication of these records is the spiritual daughter of Bishop Theophan back in Russia, Elena Yuryevna Kontsevich, the niece of another admirer of St. Theophan, the famous church writer Sergei Alexandrovich Nilus. She firmly believed in the holiness of the New Recluse, went to see him in France and made us promise to publish a book about him and his defense of the purity of Orthodox teaching.

Archbishop of Syracuse Averky (Taushev)

Archbishop of Canada Joasaph (Skorodumov)


For the awakening Holy Rus', the spiritual significance of Bishop Theophan is support in the apostolic standing in the Truth, without which it is impossible to overcome the Antichrist spirit of our time.

With the blessing of the now living Saint John, Metropolitan of St. Petersburg, this modest work of the Brotherhood of St. Herman of Alaska is being printed.

The publishers express the hope that the book will serve as an impetus for the publication in the future of the unpublished works of Bishop Theophan. A thorough study of at least his wonderful work “Russian Philokalia” will give spiritual strength to young ascetics.

The book appears with the obvious mysterious help of the Bishop himself... How he rejoices now in heaven when, in the year of the centenary (1894–1994) since the death of his spiritual teacher, St. Theophan the Recluse of Vyshensky, honored throughout the entire Orthodox world, God and his contribution come to light into a spiritual treasury, from where the spiritual poor will be able to draw for themselves the wealth of patristic wisdom, in order to live their lives comfortably and appear rich at the Judgment of God.

Schemamonk Epiphanius (Chernov)


The above-mentioned friends of Archbishop Theophan the New Recluse are now rejoicing, for they also put all their efforts into the task of collecting the former glory of Holy Rus'. This heritage is now being passed on to a new generation with the help of God, so that our young men, looking at the wondrous images of both Saints Theophan, with renewed vigor, sow the holy and good things left to us by the great ascetics.

May the all-generous Lord our God Jesus Christ help us all to become spiritually stronger and continue the holy work of strengthening the Christian race.


Hegumen German with his brethren.

May 7/20 1994;

appearance of the Holy Cross

in Jerusalem in 351

Preface to the second edition

Beloved readers in Christ! You hold in your hands an invaluable treasure - a testimony about the chosen one of God, the great lamp of the Universal Orthodox Church, Archbishop Theophan. This is the second edition of the book “Confessor of the Royal Family. Archbishop Theophan of Poltava, New Recluse.”

2nd edition cover


Such was the will of God that for several decades the name of the Lord remained unknown to the majority of the faithful, but the authors of this book knew the prediction of one servant of Christ, whose spiritual advice Archbishop Theophan himself used during his lifetime, ~ about the fate of Russia and about the exceptional position that he would occupy in due time Bishop Theophan in the earthly Church, when he becomes one of the beloved and revered Russian saints of universal significance. Bishop Theophan fought confessionally and martyrically for the Orthodox Faith, the Lord granted him a place in His Heavenly Kingdom, He destined for him to be in the future resurrected Russia, in Russia, which has atoned for its terrible sins of the 20th century.

Under amazing, miraculous circumstances, with obvious help from above, the Vladyka’s archive, which was considered forever lost, was completely unexpectedly found. And the Most Merciful Lord gave this treasure to us. “Lord, who believed what was heard from us, and to whom was the arm of the Lord revealed?” (Ps. 53:1) ~ the holy prophet exclaims with sorrow. But we have the prophecy of the ascetic we mentioned that Vladyka Theophan, who has passed into eternity, will act in Russia even after his death.


Richard (Thomas) Batts

Vyacheslav Marchenko.

Preface to this edition

The righteous are always persecuted during their lifetime; Great righteous people are often persecuted posthumously - while their persecutors are alive and while the memory of them interferes with the atheists.

The Holy Royal Family of Emperor Nicholas II has been and is being subjected to the greatest slander in the world. The people around her also received a lot of lies and rejection. The world, lying in evil, does not want to know the good, it is afraid of the light. Archbishop Theophan, confessor of the holy Tsar Nicholas and his holy Family, was a true ascetic, he became one of the new glorious saints of Christ; suffered persecution during his lifetime, but to this day is not accepted even by all Orthodox Christians - those of them who are most concerned with the organization of external well-being.

The example of the Lord’s life clearly shows how narrow the path leading to salvation is, and inspires strong souls to walk along this path.

When in the nineties I came into the hands of the manuscripts of Bishop Theophan - through my spiritual brother Thomas (Orthodox American Richard Batts) from Father Herman (Podmoshensky), I did not immediately understand what a treasure it was. But months of joint work with Foma to compile a biography passed, an understanding of the importance of the material that came to us - not according to our merit - came, and fear arose. The fear is that the book will not be accepted either by outside people or by many in the church. But the Lord, who miraculously preserved the manuscripts of His chosen one and the memories of him, showed us His saint who could bless this work: we learned that Metropolitan of St. Petersburg John (Snychev) is an admirer of Bishop Theophan, that he even wished that so that the grave of the ascetic was transferred from France to Russia.

And so we sent the manuscript to St. Petersburg.

...Weeks passed.

At this time, the abbot of the St. Herman Hermitage in Platina in Northern California (USA), Father German (Podmoshensky), was on business in Russia.

Metropolitan John (Snychev)


Father asked me to put him on the phone with Metropolitan John. Then I had the opportunity to speak with Vladyka for the first time. Bishop John immediately invited us to visit him, and I had the opportunity to visit him together with Father Herman. For the only time in my life I was privileged to see this ascetic and communicate with him.

I won’t talk about the details; Bishop John and Father Herman spoke about the main purpose of our visit. I was more interested in the Vladyka’s opinion about our manuscript. And so I, seizing the moment, excitedly asked about her. The Bishop replied that so many manuscripts come to him, the large table is piled up to the ceiling, that he physically cannot read even a small part of what is sent. He asked not to be offended, but at the same time asked what kind of manuscript it was. When I answered that it was about Vladyka Feofan (Bystrov), Vladyka John, completely changed, said: “Why, I read it, and very carefully!” In response to my request to write a preface to the future book, he replied that he himself knew much less before reading it, that he had nothing to add. When I asked for a blessing for the publication, he immediately gave it to my clarifying question: “So, we can write: Blessing of His Eminence John, Metropolitan of St. Petersburg and Ladoga?” - he replied: “If you do this, I will be happy.”


Vyacheslav Marchenko

Introduction. Childhood

The weak human word is not able to adequately tell about the high life of the Lord. The Lord in our cruel times revealed in him a great luminary of the Church, a Hierarch of high spiritual life, an ascetic, whose whole life was an unceasing prayer for the Russian country suffering under the yoke of God-fighting.

As a scholar-theologian and hierarch who constantly testified that “the true expression of the teaching of the Orthodox Church is the teaching expressed in the works of the Holy Fathers of the Church,” the Saint of Christ unwaveringly stood guard over the purity of Orthodoxy and was forced to speak out against the newly discovered deviations from the dogmatic teaching of the Church of Christ.

And naturally, he, quiet and inconspicuous, made himself many enemies and slanderers.

Archbishop Theophan, the confessor of the Royal Family, maintained high and touching reverence and Christian love for the Tsar, Empress and their most august Children throughout his entire life as the Anointed of God, the true bearers of the Christian spirit, who accepted great suffering in Christ and the crown of martyrdom from the Lord.


The future Archbishop Feofan was born in the village of Podmoshye, Novgorod province, into a large family of rural priest Dimitry Bystrov and Mother Maria (nee Razumovskaya), whose entire wealth was the piety of her parents. The baby was born on the very last day of 1873 (Old Art.) and was named after the nearest saint, Basil the Great, one of the three great universal teachers and saints.

In early childhood, when Vasily was three or four years old, he saw an amazing, prophetic dream sent from above. He retold it to his parents in his childish language, not understanding what it could mean. He saw himself in a dream already “big”, in bishop’s vestments and in a “golden cap”. And he stood in the altar on the High Place during the Divine Liturgy, and the priest, his own father, burned incense for him as a bishop.

It is interesting that the dream came true to such detail that his own father, summoned by the Holy Synod to the consecration of his son, took part in the service and actually burned incense for him, who stood on the High Place.

Little Vasya, according to the recollections of his parents, loved to pray from early childhood. He did not yet know how to read, did not know the prayers by heart... But the child knelt down in front of the holy icons, in awe of the greatness of God, and babbled with unspeakable sighs(Rom. 8:26):

- Lord, Lord, You are so big, and I am so small!..

And in that wondrous, amazing prayer of the little one was heard - unwise in words, but wise in meaning - the future unceasing prayer of Jesus as a new ascetic. And the words of the Gospel were fulfilled on him: from the mouths of babes and sucklings You have given praise(Matt. 21:16).

About this prayer, which in those years was the breath of a child’s soul, the Vladyka himself spoke to one of his cell attendants in the last years of his earthly life: “After all, all this is so touching... Yes, the Lord gives each person who prays the appropriate degree of prayer (see: 1 Samuel 2:9 - glory, text)... And think about the inner meaning of those childish, helpless words, how good they are: “Lord, have mercy on me and help me, your infinitely weak, helpless and distressed creation... Have mercy on me, Lord!”

The youth Vasily lived a quiet, unnoticeable inner life. He was focused, collected, but at the same time bright and joyful. A prayerful mood kept him

from children's pranks and excessive addiction to games. Even as a child, Vasily tasted for the Lord is good(Ps. 33:9), he tasted the gift of prayer, and prayer became his mentor for the rest of his life. She taught him to be careful about the spiritual world, because in his soul he felt the voice of an unhypocritical, indisputable Judge, who clearly informed him what was good and what was bad. As soon as the prayerful mood was interrupted and peace of mind was disturbed, Vasily realized that something was wrong. Then he began to check himself and look for the reason for what happened: either an inappropriate word was said, or an act was committed that was not pleasing to God.

And having found something wrong in his soul, he threw himself in repentance before God, begging Him for forgiveness, until his conscience calmed down and until the inner judge ceased to convict him, informing him that the sin had been forgiven by God and peace of mind had been restored.

Thus, heartfelt prayer and inner spiritual peace became his constant guides in his spiritual life. This inner mentor always showed him his life path.

The early years of the Saint

Loving the Lord God with all the strength of his pure soul, young Vasily loved the nature He created, especially the harsh nature of the North, untouched by human hands, among which he grew up. He clearly saw the Invisible God in her: For His invisible, His eternal power and Godhead(Rom. 1:20). At that time, it was still preserved in its pristine, virgin beauty. All the people of this region were farmers. But the feeding land is poor, clay and swamps, and infertile. Therefore, people here lived poorly, even in poverty. Summer here is short and winter is long. All around there are forests and swampy places with standing water. There are a lot of mushrooms and berries in the forests: blueberries, cloudberries. Lots of birds. And above all this is the vast living sky. The people around are sedate, pious, humble. And the boy Vasily inhaled this blessed air. The priest's son, quiet and diligent, was always in sight.

The time has come, he entered school. In teaching, the Lord gave him exceptional abilities. They appeared later in the parish school, and, to an even greater extent, in the Theological Seminary and Theological Academy.

Due to the poverty and large number of children of his parents, their youngest son Vasily left his home early. He was assigned to the elementary Theological School at the Alexander Nevsky Lavra at public expense. The boy grew up thin and physically weak, but studied very well: he was the first student. But he himself then already understood that his successes did not depend on him, they were a gift from God. After graduating from college, Vasily entered the Theological Seminary.

Bishop Archbishop later told his cell attendants about his studies: “It was very easy for me to study at the Theological Seminary. It was enough for me to read one page, and I could retell it almost word for word. And in the classes I was the smallest in height and the youngest in age.”


Seeing his extraordinary abilities, he was quickly transferred to the senior classes, so that he graduated from the seminary three years earlier than those with whom he entered the first class. But the future Archbishop, realizing the great spiritual danger in all this, so as not to imagine himself and fall into destructive delusion, prayed for a decrease in his abilities for the sciences. He reasoned like this: “Everyone praised me, admired me. And I could easily become proud and imagine God knows what about myself. But the Guardian Angel warned me, and I realized what an abyss gaped before me.” We do not know whether his prayer was heard, but this spiritual state in itself, a prayer for the taking away of the gift of God, is a rare phenomenon in spiritual life, testifying to the mature spiritual reasoning of the young man.

Vasily graduated brilliantly from a secondary theological educational institution, and he had to take exams for a higher educational institution, the St. Petersburg Theological Academy. He was then less than seventeen years old.

Student years

Remember your teachers (Heb. 13:7)


Professor V.V. Bolotov. Processors A.P. Lopukhin and N.H. Glubokovsky. Holy Righteous John of Kronstadt


The youngest of the applicants, just a boy, Vasily was well prepared for the exams. The only thing I was afraid of was writing philosophy from the famous professor M.I. Karinsky, especially since philosophy was not included in the seminar program. In preparation for it, he prayed to the holy martyr Justin the Philosopher and the holy great universal teachers and saints Basil the Great, Gregory the Theologian and John Chrysostom, prayed for the enlightenment of the mind, for the giving of true and easy thought.

And now the day of testing has come. Professor M.I. Karinsky entered, said hello and, turning to the board, wrote the topic of the essay: “The importance of personal experience for developing a worldview.” And young Vasily thanked God for a topic that was close and understandable. Through the prayers of the saints, the Lord gave a truly easy thought. The work, which was allotted four hours, was completed in half an hour and was only one page. Applicant Bystrov stood up and asked permission to submit his work. Mr. Professor was apparently surprised. Looking at his watch, he said with some bewilderment:

- Well, okay... Serve it.

Professor Karinsky Mikhail Ivanovich


It seems that he thought then that the youngest of the applicants simply did not understand the topic: he hesitated somewhat when he accepted the essay sheet. Having asked Vasily to wait a little, the examiner began to read. While reading, I paused several times, looking carefully at the author of the essay. When he finished reading, he said:

- Thank you, thank you!.. You can be free.

The most difficult exam passed so quickly and surprisingly easily! And the name of Vasily Bystrov was first on the list of students based on the results of all exams. (It should be noted that Professor Karinsky remembered this “impromptu” of the young student many years later, when Archimandrite Feofan was already an inspector of the St. Petersburg Theological Academy.)


Student Vasily Dimitrievich Bystrov, having completed all four academic years first, completed his theological education at the age of twenty-one. By decision of the academic council, he was retained at the academy for scientific work as a professorial fellow.

Subsequently, he spoke very warmly about the academy: about the conditions in which students lived and studied, about the possibility of scientific work.

St. Petersburg Theological Academy and Seminary


The professors worked conscientiously and even talentedly. Among them, a precious nugget shone - professor of ancient history of the Church Vasily Vasilyevich Bolotov (1854–1900). Vasily Vasilyevich spoke many languages, not only new, but also ancient, and, moreover, studied them on his own and in the shortest possible time. He knew Greek, Latin, Hebrew, Syriac and Assyrian-Babylonian cuneiform, Arabic, Abyssinian (liturgical - Ge'ez and colloquial - Ahmar), Coptic (and ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs), Armenian, Persian (cuneiform, Zend and New Persian), Sanskrit, German, French, English, Italian, Dutch, Danish-Norwegian, Portuguese, Gothic, Celtic, Turkish, Finnish, Magyar. Vasily Vasilyevich used all these languages ​​for his scientific research.

Professor Bolotov Vasily Vasilievich


He surprised and amazed everyone with his knowledge, which had nothing in common with his professorial specialty, such as, for example, higher mathematics or astronomy. As for his specialty, the scope of his knowledge can be understood from the following example.


The professor himself spoke about everything that the traveler looked at as if with blind eyes and did not see what these dumb witnesses were reporting from ancient times, because he did not know the languages ​​in which these inscriptions were made. The professor kept talking and talking, without stopping, as if reading from a book. The traveler himself later admitted to Bishop Theophan: “I was simply speechless with surprise and fascination. After all, Professor Bolotov had never been to Abyssinia, but knew in such archaeological detail all the monuments there. Just think that he quoted many inscriptions to me and accompanied all this with such historical explanations that the distant picture of events, thousands of years removed from us, came to life with amazing reality, as if in the retelling of an eyewitness... I quickly turned into only a grateful and enthusiastic listener . I was terribly uncomfortable that I wanted to tell such a person something new that he did not know. Professor Bolotov turned out to be a resident of those places and those distant times, and I tried to tell him something new about Abyssinia from my fleeting meager impressions. He knew everything in such minute detail that I had no idea... I had to frankly admit everything to the professor and ask him to forgive me.”


Professor Vasily Vasilyevich Bolotov came from common people. He was the son of a village psalm-reader, born on January 1, 1854. From childhood he showed remarkable abilities in learning and thereby attracted everyone's attention. So, he graduated with honors from theological school and seminary. As a seminary student, he knew the ancient Greek language so well that he compiled a canon in this language for Saint Basil the Great, whose name he bore. A grammar of the Abyssinian language that accidentally fell into his hands, given to him by mistake instead of a Hebrew grammar, led to his studying the Abyssinian language. According to the reviews of the seminary teachers, Vasily Bolotov occupied a place “above the first” in the class, and so much higher than the first that it was necessary to skip forty numbers behind him in order to place the next student (“To the blessed memory of Professor V.V. Bolotov.” V. Preobrazhensky. Riga, 1928, p. 1).

Having entered the St. Petersburg Theological Academy, he also immediately attracted the special attention of the Council of Professors of the Academy. When the professor in the department of ancient history of the Church died, the Academy Council decided not to occupy the vacant department until the end of the course by student V.V. Bolotov, - this student placed himself so highly in scientific terms. This decision was made in 1878, and in 1879, just a few months after completing the course, he brilliantly defended his master’s thesis on the ancient history of the Church and took the professorship. The topic of his defense was: “Origen’s Doctrine of the Holy Trinity.” This topic required multifaceted and deep knowledge of both theology and philosophy. Reviewer, Professor I.E. Troitsky, spoke of this work as deserving of three doctoral degrees (“To the blessed memory of Professor V.V. Bolotov,” p. 2). For his numerous subsequent works in this field, he was awarded the scientific degree of Doctor of Church History.

With his knowledge of many languages, he was a member of various commissions: on the issue of Old Catholics, on the accession of the Chaldean Syrians to Orthodoxy, and so on. Finally, he was a member of the state Astronomical Commission. This Commission was asked about the possibilities of calendar reform. But when Professor Bolotov read his report, involving a mass of scientific material - astronomical, mathematical, archaeological, and touched upon ancient calendars, Babylonian and others - the Commission decided that the question of calendar reform was scientifically unfounded.

Archbishop Feofan said all this and much more about Vasily Vasilyevich Bolotov.

This gifted professor treated the young student Vasily Dimitrievich Bystrov with special warmth. So, one day during the examination session, Professor Bolotov entered the classroom in which an exam was taking place in one of the important subjects of the academic course. But the professor did not participate in the examination committee. While the students were languidly waiting for their turn to take the exam, Vasily Vasilyevich unexpectedly sat down next to student V.D. Bystrov. Quite naturally, the student was embarrassed by this. But the professor, with his simple and emphatically friendly attitude towards the student, overcame this embarrassment and not as a professor, but as a comrade, began to question Vasily Dimitrievich:

- Probably tired? I know from myself that the examination session is very tiring and takes a lot of energy. But are you, as always, prepared?

- Yes, I worked hard. But whether I know the subject, I cannot judge that; the examination committee will tell you that.

– I have no doubt about your preparation. But this waiting takes a lot of energy.

“And somehow imperceptibly the professor began to take an interest in my preparation for the exam,” Vladyka later recalled. “However, his questions were not in the form of questions from a professor to a student. No, in tone these were questions from a conversation between two students, but of different courses, senior and junior. He asked, but as if wanting to convince me of my knowledge. The professor never showed his superiority in knowledge. On his part, it was a completely collegial, friendly and even friendly conversation. However, this conversation touched on a range of issues incomparably broader than the academic course.

– Great, great... Be calm. Success is guaranteed!

After these words, the professor suddenly stood up and, addressing the commission, said:

– Student Vasily Dimitrievich Bystrov passed the exam in the subject with “excellent” marks!

But I could not know that this such an unusual friendly conversation would turn out to be an exam. Apparently, the professor, in order to emphasize his kind, cordial attitude towards me and at the same time to free me from worries, had previously agreed with the commission that he would conduct the exam privately. Therefore, the chairman of the commission, addressing me, publicly stated:

– So, as you heard, you have already passed the exam. You can be free!

Professor Bolotov, turning to me, said quietly:

- So, we are free. We can leave! Let's go!

I was amazed by everything that happened and, of course, deeply grateful to Professor V.V. Bolotov... But glory and praise belong to the Lord.”

The professor favored the young student, seeing in him not only a colleague. The professor and the student had a lot in common. Both of them come from the village, from the common people. The first is the son of a village psalm-reader, the second is the son of a village priest. Both were undoubtedly prayed for by their parents' prayers. Both knew the need from personal experience. Both showed extraordinary abilities. Both completed their studies at theological school and seminary with brilliant success. After that, they also brilliantly completed their higher education at the same St. Petersburg Theological Academy. Both one and the other were selected and retained by the Academic Council as professorial fellows and master's students. Both of them began teaching at the academy the year the course was completed. Bolotov as a professor at the age of twenty-five, and Bystrov at the age of twenty-one as an associate professor. Both bore the same name - St. Basil the Great, fervently prayed to him, and he was their patron and leader. All this, of course, brought them closer and related.


To our deepest regret, Professor Vasily Vasilyevich Bolotov, who led a strict, ascetic lifestyle, died very young, forty-six years old. The head of the Russian state, Sovereign Emperor Nicholas II, expressed on his own behalf and on behalf of the entire August Family his deepest condolences regarding his death, calling Professor Dr. Vasily Vasilyevich Bolotov “incomparable.”

The Lord sent him a righteous death. Three hours before his death, he uttered the following significant words:

– How beautiful are the moments before death!

An hour later he said:

- I'm dying!

He continued to maintain his usual cheerful state and did not stop pronouncing individual words, although with difficulty:

- I’m coming to Christ... Christ is coming...

A quarter of an hour before his death, he stopped talking, folded his hands on his chest and, closing his eyes, seemed to fall asleep.

Ten minutes before his death, the priest came in and, kneeling, read the funeral prayer with the hospital staff. His death occurred during the All-Night Vigil on Maundy Thursday, April 5, 1900.

Knowing the prophecies of the saints about the onset of terrible events in the near future, he repeated during his lifetime:

– No, I’m not a resident of the 20th century! Everlasting memory!


Among other professors, Professor Alexander Pavlovich Lopukhin (born in 1852) stood out. He is known for his missionary work in North America. At the academy, he occupied various departments at different times and published many scientific works, starting with apologetics and ending with the interpretation of the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments. Professor A.P. Lopukhin really wanted to leave Vladyka Theophan, at that time a hieromonk, and then an archimandrite and associate professor in the department of Biblical history, which he himself occupied, to continue his work and bequeathed to him posthumously his library of thousands. But the Lord judged otherwise.

Vyacheslav Marchenko, Richard (Thomas) Batts

Confessor of the royal family. Archbishop Theophan of Poltava, New Recluse (1873–1940)

This publication is published in the year of the seventieth anniversary of the blessed death of Archbishop Theophan the New Recluse.

The first edition was published in 1994 with the blessing of Metropolitan of St. Petersburg and Ladoga John (Snychev)

Biography of Archbishop Feofan of Poltava (Bystrov)

Blessed are you when they revile you and persecute you and slander you in every way unjustly because of Me.

(Matt. 5:11)

Be faithful until death

and I will give you the crown of life.

(Apoc. 2, 10)

Preface to the first edition. Archbishop Theophan of Poltava – Defender of Orthodoxy

The great Saint and spiritual writer Theophan the Recluse had many readers who wanted to live like a Christian, following his teaching. But there were few true followers who were fully receptive to the acquisition of the Holy Spirit.

One of the rare recipients of a genuine inheritance was the modest bearer of his name ~ Feofan (Bistrov), Archbishop of Poltava, later of Bulgaria, who died as a recluse in the caves of France. His spiritual appearance is in many ways reminiscent of his namesake, the great recluse Feofan Vyshensky († 1894), and although historical whirlwinds carried him beyond the borders of Russia, his place in Russian hagiography of the 20th century is nevertheless noticeable and significant. The enemies of Archbishop Theophan the New Recluse tried to destroy the memory of him, but the lamp of God, even in hiding, will shine with the grace of God; such a great ascetic cannot be hidden, and his memory only grows stronger every year.

The significance of Archbishop Theophan of Poltava, who was the confessor of the Royal Family, one of the greatest theologians of his time and a humble representative of the crucified Holy Rus', lies primarily in standing for the purity of Orthodoxy. Despite the temptations of our age, despite the historical changes in the psychology of the Russian people, Bishop Theophan grows in our memory every year as a true Father of the Church.

Archbishop Feofan (Bystrov)


The theological works of Archbishop Feofan have not been sufficiently studied and remain hidden. His contribution to the treasury of Orthodox patristics has hitherto been known only in

two areas: firstly, ~ the defense of the Cross of the Lord, that is, the Orthodox teaching on the dogma of the Redemption, from the innovation of Metropolitan Anthony (Khrapovitsky); and, secondly, ~ his criticism of the Sophianism of Father Sergius Bulgakov. If history is destined to continue, the spiritual image of Archbishop Theophan of Poltava will be universally glorified. If the end of the world is not far off, then the teachings of Bishop Theophan will be support for enduring the coming trials.

The biography of Bishop Theophan was compiled on the basis of the records of his four students and cell attendants: Archbishops Averky of Syracuse († 1976) and Joasaph of Canada († 1955) and younger cell attendants - Sevryugin and Chernov (the now living schemamonk Epiphanius). At our insistence, Archbishop Averky compiled and published a biography, as well as letters written by Vladyka, mostly to himself. Chernov drew up a great work for us, but included in it a lot of extraneous things that are not directly related to the main goal - to show the general appearance of a righteous man, a confessor of true Orthodoxy. But the main “culprit” for the publication of these records is the spiritual daughter of Bishop Theophan back in Russia, Elena Yuryevna Kontsevich, the niece of another admirer of St. Theophan, the famous church writer Sergei Alexandrovich Nilus. She firmly believed in the holiness of the New Recluse, went to see him in France and made us promise to publish a book about him and his defense of the purity of Orthodox teaching.

Archbishop of Syracuse Averky (Taushev)

Archbishop of Canada Joasaph (Skorodumov)


For the awakening Holy Rus', the spiritual significance of Bishop Theophan is support in the apostolic standing in the Truth, without which it is impossible to overcome the Antichrist spirit of our time.

With the blessing of the now living Saint John, Metropolitan of St. Petersburg, this modest work of the Brotherhood of St. Herman of Alaska is being printed.

The publishers express the hope that the book will serve as an impetus for the publication in the future of the unpublished works of Bishop Theophan. A thorough study of at least his wonderful work “Russian Philokalia” will give spiritual strength to young ascetics.

The book appears with the obvious mysterious help of the Bishop himself... How he rejoices now in heaven when, in the year of the centenary (1894–1994) since the death of his spiritual teacher, St. Theophan the Recluse of Vyshensky, honored throughout the entire Orthodox world, God and his contribution come to light into a spiritual treasury, from where the spiritual poor will be able to draw for themselves the wealth of patristic wisdom, in order to live their lives comfortably and appear rich at the Judgment of God.

Schemamonk Epiphanius (Chernov)


The above-mentioned friends of Archbishop Theophan the New Recluse are now rejoicing, for they also put all their efforts into the task of collecting the former glory of Holy Rus'. This heritage is now being passed on to a new generation with the help of God, so that our young men, looking at the wondrous images of both Saints Theophan, with renewed vigor, sow the holy and good things left to us by the great ascetics.

May the all-generous Lord our God Jesus Christ help us all to become spiritually stronger and continue the holy work of strengthening the Christian race.


Hegumen German with his brethren.

May 7/20 1994;

appearance of the Holy Cross

in Jerusalem in 351

Preface to the second edition

Beloved readers in Christ! You hold in your hands an invaluable treasure - a testimony about the chosen one of God, the great lamp of the Universal Orthodox Church, Archbishop Theophan. This is the second edition of the book “Confessor of the Royal Family. Archbishop Theophan of Poltava, New Recluse.”

2nd edition cover


Such was the will of God that for several decades the name of the Lord remained unknown to the majority of the faithful, but the authors of this book knew the prediction of one servant of Christ, whose spiritual advice Archbishop Theophan himself used during his lifetime, ~ about the fate of Russia and about the exceptional position that he would occupy in due time Bishop Theophan in the earthly Church, when he becomes one of the beloved and revered Russian saints of universal significance. Bishop Theophan fought confessionally and martyrically for the Orthodox Faith, the Lord granted him a place in His Heavenly Kingdom, He destined for him to be in the future resurrected Russia, in Russia, which has atoned for its terrible sins of the 20th century.

Under amazing, miraculous circumstances, with obvious help from above, the Vladyka’s archive, which was considered forever lost, was completely unexpectedly found. And the Most Merciful Lord gave this treasure to us. “Lord, who believed what was heard from us, and to whom was the arm of the Lord revealed?” (Ps. 53:1) ~ the holy prophet exclaims with sorrow. But we have the prophecy of the ascetic we mentioned that Vladyka Theophan, who has passed into eternity, will act in Russia even after his death.


Richard (Thomas) Batts

Vyacheslav Marchenko.

Preface to this edition

The righteous are always persecuted during their lifetime; Great righteous people are often persecuted posthumously - while their persecutors are alive and while the memory of them interferes with the atheists.

The Holy Royal Family of Emperor Nicholas II has been and is being subjected to the greatest slander in the world. The people around her also received a lot of lies and rejection. The world, lying in evil, does not want to know the good, it is afraid of the light. Archbishop Theophan, confessor of the holy Tsar Nicholas and his holy Family, was a true ascetic, he became one of the new glorious saints of Christ; suffered persecution during his lifetime, but to this day is not accepted even by all Orthodox Christians - those of them who are most concerned with the organization of external well-being.

The example of the Lord’s life clearly shows how narrow the path leading to salvation is, and inspires strong souls to walk along this path.

When in the nineties I came into the hands of the manuscripts of Bishop Theophan - through my spiritual brother Thomas (Orthodox American Richard Batts) from Father Herman (Podmoshensky), I did not immediately understand what a treasure it was. But months of joint work with Foma to compile a biography passed, an understanding of the importance of the material that came to us - not according to our merit - came, and fear arose. The fear is that the book will not be accepted either by outside people or by many in the church. But the Lord, who miraculously preserved the manuscripts of His chosen one and the memories of him, showed us His saint who could bless this work: we learned that Metropolitan of St. Petersburg John (Snychev) is an admirer of Bishop Theophan, that he even wished that so that the grave of the ascetic was transferred from France to Russia.

And so we sent the manuscript to St. Petersburg.

...Weeks passed.

At this time, the abbot of the St. Herman Hermitage in Platina in Northern California (USA), Father German (Podmoshensky), was on business in Russia.

Metropolitan John (Snychev)


Father asked me to put him on the phone with Metropolitan John. Then I had the opportunity to speak with Vladyka for the first time. Bishop John immediately invited us to visit him, and I had the opportunity to visit him together with Father Herman. For the only time in my life I was privileged to see this ascetic and communicate with him.

I won’t talk about the details; Bishop John and Father Herman spoke about the main purpose of our visit. I was more interested in the Vladyka’s opinion about our manuscript. And so I, seizing the moment, excitedly asked about her. The Bishop replied that so many manuscripts come to him, the large table is piled up to the ceiling, that he physically cannot read even a small part of what is sent. He asked not to be offended, but at the same time asked what kind of manuscript it was. When I answered that it was about Vladyka Feofan (Bystrov), Vladyka John, completely changed, said: “Why, I read it, and very carefully!” In response to my request to write a preface to the future book, he replied that he himself knew much less before reading it, that he had nothing to add. When I asked for a blessing for the publication, he immediately gave it to my clarifying question: “So, we can write: Blessing of His Eminence John, Metropolitan of St. Petersburg and Ladoga?” - he replied: “If you do this, I will be happy.”


Vyacheslav Marchenko

Introduction. Childhood

The weak human word is not able to adequately tell about the high life of the Lord. The Lord in our cruel times revealed in him a great luminary of the Church, a Hierarch of high spiritual life, an ascetic, whose whole life was an unceasing prayer for the Russian country suffering under the yoke of God-fighting.

As a scholar-theologian and hierarch who constantly testified that “the true expression of the teaching of the Orthodox Church is the teaching expressed in the works of the Holy Fathers of the Church,” the Saint of Christ unwaveringly stood guard over the purity of Orthodoxy and was forced to speak out against the newly discovered deviations from the dogmatic teaching of the Church of Christ.

And naturally, he, quiet and inconspicuous, made himself many enemies and slanderers.

Archbishop Theophan, the confessor of the Royal Family, maintained high and touching reverence and Christian love for the Tsar, Empress and their most august Children throughout his entire life as the Anointed of God, the true bearers of the Christian spirit, who accepted great suffering in Christ and the crown of martyrdom from the Lord.


The future Archbishop Feofan was born in the village of Podmoshye, Novgorod province, into a large family of rural priest Dimitry Bystrov and Mother Maria (nee Razumovskaya), whose entire wealth was the piety of her parents. The baby was born on the very last day of 1873 (Old Art.) and was named after the nearest saint, Basil the Great, one of the three great universal teachers and saints.

In early childhood, when Vasily was three or four years old, he saw an amazing, prophetic dream sent from above. He retold it to his parents in his childish language, not understanding what it could mean. He saw himself in a dream already “big”, in bishop’s vestments and in a “golden cap”. And he stood in the altar on the High Place during the Divine Liturgy, and the priest, his own father, burned incense for him as a bishop.

It is interesting that the dream came true to such detail that his own father, summoned by the Holy Synod to the consecration of his son, took part in the service and actually burned incense for him, who stood on the High Place.

Little Vasya, according to the recollections of his parents, loved to pray from early childhood. He did not yet know how to read, did not know the prayers by heart... But the child knelt down in front of the holy icons, in awe of the greatness of God, and babbled with unspeakable sighs(Rom. 8:26):

- Lord, Lord, You are so big, and I am so small!..

And in that wondrous, amazing prayer of the little one was heard - unwise in words, but wise in meaning - the future unceasing prayer of Jesus as a new ascetic. And the words of the Gospel were fulfilled on him: from the mouths of babes and sucklings You have given praise(Matt. 21:16).

About this prayer, which in those years was the breath of a child’s soul, the Vladyka himself spoke to one of his cell attendants in the last years of his earthly life: “After all, all this is so touching... Yes, the Lord gives each person who prays the appropriate degree of prayer (see: 1 Samuel 2:9 - glory, text)... And think about the inner meaning of those childish, helpless words, how good they are: “Lord, have mercy on me and help me, your infinitely weak, helpless and distressed creation... Have mercy on me, Lord!”

The youth Vasily lived a quiet, unnoticeable inner life. He was focused, collected, but at the same time bright and joyful. A prayerful mood kept him

from children's pranks and excessive addiction to games. Even as a child, Vasily tasted for the Lord is good(Ps. 33:9), he tasted the gift of prayer, and prayer became his mentor for the rest of his life. She taught him to be careful about the spiritual world, because in his soul he felt the voice of an unhypocritical, indisputable Judge, who clearly informed him what was good and what was bad. As soon as the prayerful mood was interrupted and peace of mind was disturbed, Vasily realized that something was wrong. Then he began to check himself and look for the reason for what happened: either an inappropriate word was said, or an act was committed that was not pleasing to God.

And having found something wrong in his soul, he threw himself in repentance before God, begging Him for forgiveness, until his conscience calmed down and until the inner judge ceased to convict him, informing him that the sin had been forgiven by God and peace of mind had been restored.

Thus, heartfelt prayer and inner spiritual peace became his constant guides in his spiritual life. This inner mentor always showed him his life path.

The early years of the Saint

Loving the Lord God with all the strength of his pure soul, young Vasily loved the nature He created, especially the harsh nature of the North, untouched by human hands, among which he grew up. He clearly saw the Invisible God in her: For His invisible, His eternal power and Godhead(Rom. 1:20). At that time, it was still preserved in its pristine, virgin beauty. All the people of this region were farmers. But the feeding land is poor, clay and swamps, and infertile. Therefore, people here lived poorly, even in poverty. Summer here is short and winter is long. All around there are forests and swampy places with standing water. There are a lot of mushrooms and berries in the forests: blueberries, cloudberries. Lots of birds. And above all this is the vast living sky. The people around are sedate, pious, humble. And the boy Vasily inhaled this blessed air. The priest's son, quiet and diligent, was always in sight.

The time has come, he entered school. In teaching, the Lord gave him exceptional abilities. They appeared later in the parish school, and, to an even greater extent, in the Theological Seminary and Theological Academy.

Due to the poverty and large number of children of his parents, their youngest son Vasily left his home early. He was assigned to the elementary Theological School at the Alexander Nevsky Lavra at public expense. The boy grew up thin and physically weak, but studied very well: he was the first student. But he himself then already understood that his successes did not depend on him, they were a gift from God. After graduating from college, Vasily entered the Theological Seminary.

Bishop Archbishop later told his cell attendants about his studies: “It was very easy for me to study at the Theological Seminary. It was enough for me to read one page, and I could retell it almost word for word. And in the classes I was the smallest in height and the youngest in age.”


Seeing his extraordinary abilities, he was quickly transferred to the senior classes, so that he graduated from the seminary three years earlier than those with whom he entered the first class. But the future Archbishop, realizing the great spiritual danger in all this, so as not to imagine himself and fall into destructive delusion, prayed for a decrease in his abilities for the sciences. He reasoned like this: “Everyone praised me, admired me. And I could easily become proud and imagine God knows what about myself. But the Guardian Angel warned me, and I realized what an abyss gaped before me.” We do not know whether his prayer was heard, but this spiritual state in itself, a prayer for the taking away of the gift of God, is a rare phenomenon in spiritual life, testifying to the mature spiritual reasoning of the young man.

Vasily graduated brilliantly from a secondary theological educational institution, and he had to take exams for a higher educational institution, the St. Petersburg Theological Academy. He was then less than seventeen years old.

Student years

Remember your teachers (Heb. 13:7)


Professor V.V. Bolotov. Processors A.P. Lopukhin and N.H. Glubokovsky. Holy Righteous John of Kronstadt


The youngest of the applicants, just a boy, Vasily was well prepared for the exams. The only thing I was afraid of was writing philosophy from the famous professor M.I. Karinsky, especially since philosophy was not included in the seminar program. In preparation for it, he prayed to the holy martyr Justin the Philosopher and the holy great universal teachers and saints Basil the Great, Gregory the Theologian and John Chrysostom, prayed for the enlightenment of the mind, for the giving of true and easy thought.

And now the day of testing has come. Professor M.I. Karinsky entered, said hello and, turning to the board, wrote the topic of the essay: “The importance of personal experience for developing a worldview.” And young Vasily thanked God for a topic that was close and understandable. Through the prayers of the saints, the Lord gave a truly easy thought. The work, which was allotted four hours, was completed in half an hour and was only one page. Applicant Bystrov stood up and asked permission to submit his work. Mr. Professor was apparently surprised. Looking at his watch, he said with some bewilderment:

- Well, okay... Serve it.

Professor Karinsky Mikhail Ivanovich


It seems that he thought then that the youngest of the applicants simply did not understand the topic: he hesitated somewhat when he accepted the essay sheet. Having asked Vasily to wait a little, the examiner began to read. While reading, I paused several times, looking carefully at the author of the essay. When he finished reading, he said:

- Thank you, thank you!.. You can be free.

The most difficult exam passed so quickly and surprisingly easily! And the name of Vasily Bystrov was first on the list of students based on the results of all exams. (It should be noted that Professor Karinsky remembered this “impromptu” of the young student many years later, when Archimandrite Feofan was already an inspector of the St. Petersburg Theological Academy.)


Student Vasily Dimitrievich Bystrov, having completed all four academic years first, completed his theological education at the age of twenty-one. By decision of the academic council, he was retained at the academy for scientific work as a professorial fellow.

Subsequently, he spoke very warmly about the academy: about the conditions in which students lived and studied, about the possibility of scientific work.

St. Petersburg Theological Academy and Seminary


The professors worked conscientiously and even talentedly. Among them, a precious nugget shone - professor of ancient history of the Church Vasily Vasilyevich Bolotov (1854–1900). Vasily Vasilyevich spoke many languages, not only new, but also ancient, and, moreover, studied them on his own and in the shortest possible time. He knew Greek, Latin, Hebrew, Syriac and Assyrian-Babylonian cuneiform, Arabic, Abyssinian (liturgical - Ge'ez and colloquial - Ahmar), Coptic (and ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs), Armenian, Persian (cuneiform, Zend and New Persian), Sanskrit, German, French, English, Italian, Dutch, Danish-Norwegian, Portuguese, Gothic, Celtic, Turkish, Finnish, Magyar. Vasily Vasilyevich used all these languages ​​for his scientific research.

Professor Bolotov Vasily Vasilievich


He surprised and amazed everyone with his knowledge, which had nothing in common with his professorial specialty, such as, for example, higher mathematics or astronomy. As for his specialty, the scope of his knowledge can be understood from the following example.


The professor himself spoke about everything that the traveler looked at as if with blind eyes and did not see what these dumb witnesses were reporting from ancient times, because he did not know the languages ​​in which these inscriptions were made. The professor kept talking and talking, without stopping, as if reading from a book. The traveler himself later admitted to Bishop Theophan: “I was simply speechless with surprise and fascination. After all, Professor Bolotov had never been to Abyssinia, but knew in such archaeological detail all the monuments there. Just think that he quoted many inscriptions to me and accompanied all this with such historical explanations that the distant picture of events, thousands of years removed from us, came to life with amazing reality, as if in the retelling of an eyewitness... I quickly turned into only a grateful and enthusiastic listener . I was terribly uncomfortable that I wanted to tell such a person something new that he did not know. Professor Bolotov turned out to be a resident of those places and those distant times, and I tried to tell him something new about Abyssinia from my fleeting meager impressions. He knew everything in such minute detail that I had no idea... I had to frankly admit everything to the professor and ask him to forgive me.”


Professor Vasily Vasilyevich Bolotov came from common people. He was the son of a village psalm-reader, born on January 1, 1854. From childhood he showed remarkable abilities in learning and thereby attracted everyone's attention. So, he graduated with honors from theological school and seminary. As a seminary student, he knew the ancient Greek language so well that he compiled a canon in this language for Saint Basil the Great, whose name he bore. A grammar of the Abyssinian language that accidentally fell into his hands, given to him by mistake instead of a Hebrew grammar, led to his studying the Abyssinian language. According to the reviews of the seminary teachers, Vasily Bolotov occupied a place “above the first” in the class, and so much higher than the first that it was necessary to skip forty numbers behind him in order to place the next student (“To the blessed memory of Professor V.V. Bolotov.” V. Preobrazhensky. Riga, 1928, p. 1).

Having entered the St. Petersburg Theological Academy, he also immediately attracted the special attention of the Council of Professors of the Academy. When the professor in the department of ancient history of the Church died, the Academy Council decided not to occupy the vacant department until the end of the course by student V.V. Bolotov, - this student placed himself so highly in scientific terms. This decision was made in 1878, and in 1879, just a few months after completing the course, he brilliantly defended his master’s thesis on the ancient history of the Church and took the professorship. The topic of his defense was: “Origen’s Doctrine of the Holy Trinity.” This topic required multifaceted and deep knowledge of both theology and philosophy. Reviewer, Professor I.E. Troitsky, spoke of this work as deserving of three doctoral degrees (“To the blessed memory of Professor V.V. Bolotov,” p. 2). For his numerous subsequent works in this field, he was awarded the scientific degree of Doctor of Church History.

With his knowledge of many languages, he was a member of various commissions: on the issue of Old Catholics, on the accession of the Chaldean Syrians to Orthodoxy, and so on. Finally, he was a member of the state Astronomical Commission. This Commission was asked about the possibilities of calendar reform. But when Professor Bolotov read his report, involving a mass of scientific material - astronomical, mathematical, archaeological, and touched upon ancient calendars, Babylonian and others - the Commission decided that the question of calendar reform was scientifically unfounded.

Archbishop Feofan said all this and much more about Vasily Vasilyevich Bolotov.

This gifted professor treated the young student Vasily Dimitrievich Bystrov with special warmth. So, one day during the examination session, Professor Bolotov entered the classroom in which an exam was taking place in one of the important subjects of the academic course. But the professor did not participate in the examination committee. While the students were languidly waiting for their turn to take the exam, Vasily Vasilyevich unexpectedly sat down next to student V.D. Bystrov. Quite naturally, the student was embarrassed by this. But the professor, with his simple and emphatically friendly attitude towards the student, overcame this embarrassment and not as a professor, but as a comrade, began to question Vasily Dimitrievich:

- Probably tired? I know from myself that the examination session is very tiring and takes a lot of energy. But are you, as always, prepared?

- Yes, I worked hard. But whether I know the subject, I cannot judge that; the examination committee will tell you that.

– I have no doubt about your preparation. But this waiting takes a lot of energy.

“And somehow imperceptibly the professor began to take an interest in my preparation for the exam,” Vladyka later recalled. “However, his questions were not in the form of questions from a professor to a student. No, in tone these were questions from a conversation between two students, but of different courses, senior and junior. He asked, but as if wanting to convince me of my knowledge. The professor never showed his superiority in knowledge. On his part, it was a completely collegial, friendly and even friendly conversation. However, this conversation touched on a range of issues incomparably broader than the academic course.

– Great, great... Be calm. Success is guaranteed!

After these words, the professor suddenly stood up and, addressing the commission, said:

– Student Vasily Dimitrievich Bystrov passed the exam in the subject with “excellent” marks!

But I could not know that this such an unusual friendly conversation would turn out to be an exam. Apparently, the professor, in order to emphasize his kind, cordial attitude towards me and at the same time to free me from worries, had previously agreed with the commission that he would conduct the exam privately. Therefore, the chairman of the commission, addressing me, publicly stated:

– So, as you heard, you have already passed the exam. You can be free!

Professor Bolotov, turning to me, said quietly:

- So, we are free. We can leave! Let's go!

I was amazed by everything that happened and, of course, deeply grateful to Professor V.V. Bolotov... But glory and praise belong to the Lord.”

The professor favored the young student, seeing in him not only a colleague. The professor and the student had a lot in common. Both of them come from the village, from the common people. The first is the son of a village psalm-reader, the second is the son of a village priest. Both were undoubtedly prayed for by their parents' prayers. Both knew the need from personal experience. Both showed extraordinary abilities. Both completed their studies at theological school and seminary with brilliant success. After that, they also brilliantly completed their higher education at the same St. Petersburg Theological Academy. Both one and the other were selected and retained by the Academic Council as professorial fellows and master's students. Both of them began teaching at the academy the year the course was completed. Bolotov as a professor at the age of twenty-five, and Bystrov at the age of twenty-one as an associate professor. Both bore the same name - St. Basil the Great, fervently prayed to him, and he was their patron and leader. All this, of course, brought them closer and related.


To our deepest regret, Professor Vasily Vasilyevich Bolotov, who led a strict, ascetic lifestyle, died very young, forty-six years old. The head of the Russian state, Sovereign Emperor Nicholas II, expressed on his own behalf and on behalf of the entire August Family his deepest condolences regarding his death, calling Professor Dr. Vasily Vasilyevich Bolotov “incomparable.”

The Lord sent him a righteous death. Three hours before his death, he uttered the following significant words:

– How beautiful are the moments before death!

An hour later he said:

- I'm dying!

He continued to maintain his usual cheerful state and did not stop pronouncing individual words, although with difficulty:

- I’m coming to Christ... Christ is coming...

A quarter of an hour before his death, he stopped talking, folded his hands on his chest and, closing his eyes, seemed to fall asleep.

Ten minutes before his death, the priest came in and, kneeling, read the funeral prayer with the hospital staff. His death occurred during the All-Night Vigil on Maundy Thursday, April 5, 1900.

Knowing the prophecies of the saints about the onset of terrible events in the near future, he repeated during his lifetime:

– No, I’m not a resident of the 20th century! Everlasting memory!


Among other professors, Professor Alexander Pavlovich Lopukhin (born in 1852) stood out. He is known for his missionary work in North America. At the academy, he occupied various departments at different times and published many scientific works, starting with apologetics and ending with the interpretation of the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments. Professor A.P. Lopukhin really wanted to leave Vladyka Theophan, at that time a hieromonk, and then an archimandrite and associate professor in the department of Biblical history, which he himself occupied, to continue his work and bequeathed to him posthumously his library of thousands. But the Lord judged otherwise.

Professor Lopukhin Alexander Pavlovich


Of the younger professors, Vladyka later recalled the name of the emeritus professor (this was the official title) and doctor in the department of Holy Scripture of the New Testament, Nikolai Nikanorovich Glubokovsky (1867 - late 1930s). This professor was a man of phenomenal memory. He knew all the Scriptures of the New Testament in the original language, in Greek and in Church Slavonic and Russian.

Honored Professor Nikolai Nikanorovich Glubokovsky


Among the mentors and teachers of the academy, it is necessary to mention the name of the holy righteous John of Kronstadt.

Father John was not formally a professor at the Theological Academy, but essentially he honoris causa doctor and professor of this Theological Academy, since he studied in it, and graduated from it, and through the labors of his word, with his “Life in Christ” he far surpassed all knowledge. Bishop Theophan spoke about this more than once. He personally knew the holy righteous John, they even celebrated the Divine Liturgy together.

Holy Righteous John of Kronstadt


One day a very memorable incident occurred for Bishop Theophan, testifying to the wondrous gift of Father John’s foresight. Vladyka said that at that time he was an inspector at the academy. He was preparing to celebrate the Liturgy the next day in one of the churches in the capital, where there was a patronal feast day. But he had urgent, pressing work: to submit a written report to the Metropolitan. He said: “I wrote an emergency report in the evening and all night, and for this reason I did not have to rest. When I finished my work, it was already morning, I had to go to the temple. And there, among other clergy, Father John concelebrated with me. Mass ended, the clergy took communion at the altar.

At a convenient moment, during communion, Father John came up to me and congratulated me on receiving the Holy Mysteries.


And then he looked at me especially carefully and, shaking his head, said: “Oh, how difficult it is to write all night, and then, without rest at all, go straight to the temple and perform the Divine Liturgy... Help, help you, Lord, and strengthen you!” You can imagine how gratifying it was to hear such words from such a person. I suddenly felt that all my fatigue instantly disappeared at these words... Yes, Father John of Kronstadt was a great righteous man!”

After a short silence, Vladyka continued: “And how many people there were, blind and deaf, who did not accept Father John and treated him very rudely. And even among the priests there were such people. So, for example, Father John once arrived for a patronal feast in one of the churches in St. Petersburg. And the abbot of the temple, seeing him, began to shout at him:

-Who invited you here? Why did you come? I didn't invite you. Look, what a “saint” you are. We know such saints!

Father John was embarrassed and said:

- Calm down, father, I’ll leave now...

And he shouts at him:

- Look, what a “miracle worker” you are. Get out of here! I didn't invite you...

Father John meekly and humbly asked for forgiveness and left the temple...

And there was another case in the Kronstadt St. Andrew’s Cathedral, where Father John was rector. Here one of the servants began to be indignant:

- That you give money to everyone, but to me, I serve you, you never gave anything. What it is?

The priest was embarrassed, silent and, apparently, praying internally. And he continues to be indignant and scold him, without mincing words.

A psalm-reader who happened to be here stood up for the priest:

– Are you really out of your mind?! Is that really possible?! It’s embarrassing and scary to think about what you’re saying to the priest.

And, going over the merits of Father John, he mentioned among other things that he was the rector.

- But that’s true, because I’m the abbot. Is it possible to talk to the abbot like that?! No, no, no... You can't, you can't...

Archimandrite Feofan (Bistrov)


Having said this, Father John turned and left.”

Bishop Theophan remarked: “What humility Father John has! Neither the gift of insight, nor the gift of healing, nor the working of miracles - he did not attribute any of this to himself.

But only that the abbot should not say that!”

Despite the fact that Father John graduated from the academy many years earlier than Bishop Theophan, the student memory of the student John Ilyich Sergiev was preserved within the walls of the academy. The future luminary of Kronstadt and All-Russia used to retire to an empty auditorium during his free time from lectures. Reading St. John Chrysostom, the future great church pastor prayerfully rejoiced over the great Saint, spiritually delighted with what he read. Bishop Theophan always noted, when speaking about Father John of Kronstadt, his inherent spontaneity, which testified to his strong faith, the purity and virginity of his soul. Father John was always pure and spontaneous, like a child.

Vladyka Archbishop, while still an archimandrite and inspector of the St. Petersburg Theological Academy, took part in the funeral of the great shepherd in 1908.

Shepherd and teacher. Confessor of the Royal Family

In 1896, Vasily Dimitrievich was appointed associate professor of the St. Petersburg Theological Academy in the department of Biblical history. In the third year of his professorial activity, in 1898, he took monasticism with the name Theophan in honor of the Venerable Theophan the Confessor, Bishop of Sigrian, and in reverent memory of the Most Reverend Theophan, the Recluse of Vyshensky. In the same year he was ordained to the rank of hierodeacon and hieromonk.

In 1901, by His Eminence Metropolitan Anthony (Vadkovsky) of St. Petersburg and Ladoga, in the house church of the St. Petersburg Theological Academy, he was elevated to the rank of archimandrite with the appointment of acting inspector of the academy.

Saint Theophan, Recluse of Vyshensky


Metropolitan Anthony presented Archimandrite Theophan with a staff.

In connection with this appointment of Archimandrite Theophan to the position of inspector of the academy, it is necessary to note the special feature of Father Theophan as a monk.

The academy's charter states that the inspector must have a master's degree and is therefore required to submit an essay for this degree.

Modern edition. Kyiv, 2004


But Archimandrite Theophan did not submit an essay for such a competition, although the work was written. He did this because he, as a monk who had taken a vow of poverty and humility, could not seek, desire and achieve the glory of a scientist. This is contrary to the vows of monasticism. The work lay on his desk for several years, until finally another professor, in his absence, took his scientific work and submitted it to the Academic Council. The topic of the essay was: “Tetragram, or the Divine Old Testament Name.” This work was a master's thesis in the Department of Biblical History of the Old Testament. It was published in 1905 and was highly appreciated by scientific criticism both in Russia and abroad. She was awarded the loud epithet: “The Famous Tetragram”! In it, the author examined the question of the correct pronunciation of the Name and concluded that the pronunciation “Jehovah” is the result of an incorrect reading, whereas, judging by many ancient testimonies, it should be correctly pronounced as “Yahweh”. In it he also explored questions about the meaning, origin, antiquity and use of the Divine Old Testament Name. But, however, when the book went on sale, as Archbishop Theophan himself reported:

“I drove a cab around all the bookstores and warehouses of the capital and bought all the books (“Tetragrams”) and burned them!”

So Father Archimandrite fought against the love of fame in himself.

In this case, as in other similar ones, he asked for spiritual advice from the grace-filled elders, especially such as the famous hieroschemamonks Alexy of Valaam, Isidore and Barnabas of Gethsemane. In all circumstances, he followed the path of the elder's advice, mercilessly cutting off everything that contradicted the predetermined path. He and the library of Professor A.P., bequeathed to him. Lopukhin was transferred to the Theological Academy. And it is not surprising that many people, not understanding why he did this, slandered him and laughed at him.

Portrait of St. Barnabas of Gethsemane


Also in 1905, after his master's thesis was published, he was elevated to the rank of extraordinary professor and confirmed as inspector of the academy.


And in the same 1905, it was first accepted by the Sovereign Emperor Nicholas II. In his diary entry dated November 13 (26), the Tsar noted:

“Accepted by the arch. Feofan, inspector of the St. Petersburg Theological Academy."

Soon after this, Father Theophan was invited to become the confessor of the Royal Family. Today, after so many years, it is difficult to even imagine the full responsibility before God that this obedience entailed. After all, the priest in the Sacrament of Confession is a witness of the soul repenting before the Lord and absolves sins not by his own power, but by the grace from the Lord given to him at ordination; he, as a confessor, enters into a deeply trusting relationship with the confessor and, being a spiritual father, guides the soul through moral and spiritual temptations in accordance with the teachings of the Holy Church. Being the spiritual father of any Christian soul is a huge responsibility, but being the confessor of an Orthodox Monarch is a service of incomparable spiritual meaning. God's anointed, Tsar Nikolai Alexandrovich, was responsible not only for himself, but also for the entire Russian people. During the coronation, the Sovereign vowed to stand before God for his people, to preserve Russia as an Orthodox state, and upon death to hand it over intact to his Heir, honestly fulfilling his duty as the father of the Fatherland. The monarch stood before the Lord for Russia both politically and spiritually. The anointing bestowed God's grace; and Nicholas II Alexandrovich knew that the state of his own soul depended on the fulfillment of his vow. Father Theophan was not a political or administrative adviser to the Tsar, he was the “conscience of the Tsar,” the voice of Christian traditions and the keeper of the Orthodox commandments on which his ministry was built.


Father Feofan had a good influence on the entire Family. The diaries of Empress Alexandra Feodorovna from this period are full of extracts from the writings of the Fathers of the Church, which testifies to the spiritual attention with which she studied the recommended spiritual literature. Her notes to her little daughters, where she reminded them to “read the book that Father brought you before Communion,” reflect Father Theophan’s concern for the Royal Children as well.

In 1909, on February 1, Archimandrite Theophan was appointed rector of the St. Petersburg Theological Academy, and at the same time three weeks later, on Sunday February 22, on the day of remembrance of the great Saint Gregory Palamas, Archbishop of Thessalonica, in the second week of Lent, In the Cathedral of the Alexander Nevsky Lavra, the consecration of Archimandrite Theophan as Bishop of Yamburg, vicar of the St. Petersburg diocese, took place.

The consecration was performed by the First Member of the Holy Synod, His Eminence Anthony (Vadkovsky), Metropolitan of St. Petersburg and Ladoga, with other members of the Holy Synod and with other hierarchs who arrived in the capital, a total of thirteen and the fourteenth, the newly ordained Bishop Theophan with many concelebrating priests and deacons.

Emperor Nicholas II Alexandrovich and Heir Alexey Nikolaevich.

Empress Alexandra Feodorovna


The very day on which the sacrament of consecration was performed is deeply symbolic. This is the day of remembrance of St. Gregory Palamas, defender of the Jesus Prayer and denouncer and destroyer of the “thorny” heresy of Barlaam and Polikindinus. By this, the person being ordained was already spiritually instructed that he should imitate the great Saint Gregory Palamas, and in addition, as the bearer of the name of Saint Theophan the Confessor, he was charged with imitation of this defender of the purity of Orthodoxy, as an imitation of the Most Reverend Theophan, the Recluse of Blessed Memory, who was especially revered by the person being ordained of blessed memory. .

Alexander Nevsky Lavra


When he was named bishop, Archimandrite Theophan uttered the usual word in these cases. But it amazes with its special style - the style of humble simplicity and naturalness. One can see the lofty, unearthly, selfless soul of the future bishop, embarking on the supreme service in the Holy Church of Christ. No rhetorical devices or unnecessary phrases. A simple, gracious truth resounds in his deep words. The spirit of the ancient Holy Fathers, anchorite hermits, speaks in them. Addressing the Holy Synod, he began like this:

“The word of God, calling to the field of the Church of God workers of pastoral service, whom the Church so needs at all times of its historical existence on earth, has finally reached me.

With what feelings do I accept this word of God?

Personally, I myself have never been carried away by public service and have not sought it, and even, as far as possible, shied away from it. And if, despite this mood of mine, I am called to this service, then I believe that this is truly the will of God and that through a combination of visible circumstances the Lord Himself invisibly speaks to me, authoritatively commanding me to take on the burden of a new service.

Metropolitan Anthony (Vadkovsky)


But if this is God’s will for me, then blessed be it! I accept it. I accept it with fear and trembling, but, however, without embarrassment or fear. Let this not seem surprising to anyone. More than anyone, I know my mental and physical weaknesses and my insignificance. Only a few years separate me from the abyss of non-existence, from which I am called into existence by the omnipotent wave of the Divine Will. Then, upon my entry into existence, I observe within myself the constant struggle of life and death in the realm of existence, both natural and grace-filled-spiritual.

Oh, how difficult this struggle can be in me at times, but let there be thanksgiving to the Lord for it!.. It deeply rooted in my heart the saving truth that in myself I am nothing, and everything for me is the Lord. He is my life, He is my strength, He is my joy.

Father, Son and Holy Spirit, Holy and Supernatural Trinity, Divine and adoring every rational being, tirelessly and lovingly seeking Her and looking at Her.

And at this significant time for me, with faith and love, I turn my spiritual gaze to this Prenatural Trinity. From Her I expect help, consolation, encouragement, strengthening and admonition for the high and difficult service ahead of me. I deeply believe that just as the Holy Spirit, emanating from the Father through the Son, once descended on the apostles in the form of tongues of fire, rested invisibly on them and transformed their weakness into strength, so He will definitely descend on my insignificance and strengthen my weakness.

Archimandrite Feofan (Bistrov)


I earnestly and humbly ask you, God-wise archpastors, on the upcoming significant day for me of the great sacrament of episcopal ordination performed over me in the Church of the Holy Trinity, together with the entire host of praying faithful children of the Church of God, offer up a sacred prayer for me to the Most Holy Trinity, that it will abundantly endow She gave me all the gifts required for a new service: may she open my mind to the understanding of the Divine Mysteries, may she strengthen my will to accomplish the works of God, may she inflame my heart with the fire of all-reviving Divine Love, so necessary for the shepherd of human souls in this long-suffering human life! And may all my service and all my life be for the glory of the Triune Lord, to Whom alone is due all honor and worship forever and ever! Amen” (“Addition to the Church Gazette of the Holy Government Synod”, No. 9 for 1909).

After this consecration, the newly ordained Bishop Theophan received from the Cabinet of His Majesty a gift from the Sovereign Emperor Nicholas II Alexandrovich, the Empress Alexandra Feodorovna and the entire August Family - a panagia, the same as that worn by His Grace Theophan, the Recluse of Vyshensky, with the image of the Image of Christ the Savior Not Made by Hands.

Bishop Theophan, with great meekness and patience, with spiritual courage and unyielding episcopal firmness, bore the obedience entrusted to him by the Holy Church, and not only in the academy, but also until the last day of his long-suffering life.

Temptations. “Dispute” with V.V. Rozanov

Bishop Feofan spent almost twenty years, from 1891 to 1910, within the walls of the St. Petersburg Theological Academy. First as a young student, then as a master's student at the Academy Council and at the same time as an associate professor. Then Master and Extraordinary Professor acting as Inspector. And finally, as an inspector (from 1905), and from 1909 - as the rector of the St. Petersburg Theological Academy.

The Bishop labored in three fields: scientific-academic, pastoral-priestly, and monastic-ascetic. He had the rare gift of combining the spiritual and the spiritual without compromising one another. The Lord led His chosen one through temptations, and considerable temptations. In those years, society was infected with “advanced”, revolutionary sentiments. Many longed for a “better future” on this sinful earth, forgetting about a truly better world, about the Heavenly Fatherland. To a certain extent, these sentiments also affected church circles. This trend has also penetrated into religious educational institutions. Disagreeing and being indignant has become a sign of good manners. In academies, representatives of liberal ideas appeared among both professors and students. The slogan of “freedom” of the Antichrist has become the proud banner of many. And the young inspector of the highest theological school had to testify before those who did not understand that the Kingdom of Christ is not of this world(John 18:36). By his position, he was the leader of the Academic Council, although he was younger than all the professors: most of them knew him as a student. The speeches in the Council were restless. Many demanded, accused and insulted. The young inspector had to reconcile and reassure. But the trend of renewal was strong then, everything raged and seethed. There were attacks not only on each other, but also on the Vladyka himself. He was forced to answer “thorny questions,” but invariably maintained monastic calm, preaching the gospel of peace (see: Eph. 6:15).


The conflict with part of the professoriate, which fell under the influence of the West, occurred in connection with the special tasks facing the St. Petersburg Theological Academy. These special tasks arose from historical and geographical conditions.

Thus, the Kazan Theological Academy was charged with protecting from Islam, Buddhism and other eastern religions with which Russia came into contact on the eastern borders of the Empire.

The Kyiv Theological Academy was tasked with protecting against Catholicism and Uniatism.

The Moscow Theological Academy was supposed to develop issues of overcoming the Old Believer schism in the Russian Orthodox Church and protecting against sectarianism.

And finally, the St. Petersburg Theological Academy had the most difficult task: to guard and protect Holy Orthodoxy from the penetration of pernicious ideas from the West: liberalism, Protestantism, materialism, atheism, all anti-Christianity and Freemasonry.

During his period as rector at the St. Petersburg Theological Academy, His Grace Theophan, despite all the protests of some of the professors, declared in the name of Antichrist “freedom,” confessorically fulfilled his sacred duty.


Later, Bishop Theophan spoke about a painful conflict that occurred between him and one of the professors, who wished for freedom from the yoke of Christ. He began to live in sinful cohabitation with the wife of his colleague in full view of the entire academy. The Academy's authorities tried not to notice this, not wanting to aggravate relations with the famous professor. But when the future Vladyka became an inspector, a striking feature of his spiritual structure immediately became known to everyone: confessional service to the truth of God, despite any personal disadvantages. Bishop Theophan made a proposal to the Academic Council that the professor should act according to the law, in accordance with the requirements of the legal provisions of the Orthodox Church:

“It is completely unacceptable for a professor of the Theological Academy to live unmarried and, moreover, with someone else’s wife.” After all, the St. Petersburg Theological Academy is a high place for training future shepherds of the Orthodox Church in the Orthodox Kingdom. After all, this academy is before the eyes of everyone in the capital of the Empire, and millions follow its example... And how is such disrespect and violation of the laws of the Church and state possible?

The professor was terribly indignant and indignant:

– What right does he have to interfere in my private life?

To this, Vladyka replied that, firstly, this is not exactly “private life.” A professor at the Theological Academy must, by his position, live like a Christian. And secondly, according to the law, the academy inspector is obliged to pay attention to this...

And the professor had to choose: either leave the Theological Academy and live a private life, or humble himself before the law of the Church. The Academic Council supported its inspector, and the professor was forced to obey. Bishop Theophan always recalled this conflict with bitterness. The professor did not have the Christian courage to admit his guilt and reconcile. And the Lord imposed a lifelong penance on his wife: she suffered from a serious mental illness. The famous professor had a heavy cross to bear.


The Antichrist spirit of Judaic liberalism, which caused so much trouble in the destinies of the Russian people and in the fate of the Russian Orthodox statehood, in those pre-revolutionary years increasingly penetrated the walls of religious educational institutions. And since there were weak-hearted professors, what can we say about the academy’s students?

Among them were students who, under the proud guise of “free-thinking people” and nihilists, tried to legitimize “their will.” And it must be said frankly that such a mental state, according to the Holy Fathers, is the most serious spiritual illness of a person. It is called spiritual charm.

One of the students, in his conceit and self-delusion, began to sharply oppose the beliefs and religious customs of society and the Church. Proud of his disobedience to the laws and rules of the Theological Academy, this student, not only in words, but also in all his appearance and behavior, tried to be different from everyone else, in order to thereby declare his freedom. He deliberately dressed sloppily and grew an equally sloppy beard and long hair. In the hostel, contrary to the rules, he lay down on the bed at an inopportune time, and even with shoes on.

The inspector of the academy became aware of all this. And one day, when this troublemaker was lying on his bed, Archimandrite Feofan entered the dormitory. He continued to lie there, obviously hoping to cause a storm of anger. But the archimandrite calmly asked him:

– Why are you in the bedroom at inopportune times and, contrary to the rules, lying on the bed?

- I’m lying because I want to!

-Are you perhaps sick? But you need to take off your shoes...

– It’s more convenient for me... And don’t worry about my health!

- Why are you behaving this way?

- How come"?!

– You grew a shaggy beard and the same hair!

- Why did you let him go?

– This is what the law of the Church dictates for a monk. I obey the law and advise you to obey the rules common to all.

“But I don’t recognize any rules or laws, except my desire: I want it, that’s all!”

– Did you think that every true Christian cannot reason like you, he does not have the right to follow his “I want” and “I don’t want”, but only what God, our Lord Jesus Christ, commands us?!

After these words there was silence, and the archimandrite left. The rude man was obviously waiting for administrative measures to become famous as an innocent victim. But no such measures were taken.

In this case, Archimandrite Theophan showed himself to be a genuine, real monk. He endured the impudent rudeness of the student who imagined himself as a hero, refused to accept the administrative measures given to him by the position of inspector of the Theological Academy, meekly accepted the defiant behavior of the impudent one, because the Lord Jesus Christ, our Divine Savior, said: Blessed are the meek for they will inherit the earth(Matt. 5:5).

– Why talk to such a person and in such a state of mind? Civil authorities must speak to people like him in their own “language.”

They do not recognize or understand another language... Perhaps later the Lord enlightened him, and he realized his mistake.

But if he did not understand and joined the revolution, then he could perish spiritually.

Rozanov Vasily Vasilievich


Vladyka Archbishop once recalled a silent dispute with the famous philosopher-publicist Vasily Vasilyevich Rozanov. When he visited the Bishop, the Right Reverend was going to take a walk in the fresh air in the academy’s garden.


Vladyka loved to walk in this garden, when his mind and heart were occupied only with the Jesus Prayer. Since the guest was familiar to him before, he invited him to take a walk outside on a rare fine day for the capital. The philosopher, quite unexpectedly, suddenly began to denounce monasticism very excitedly and loudly. The Bishop remained silent in response, without being distracted from prayer. Then Rozanov continued his denunciations. Then, after waiting a little and not hearing any objections, he became thoughtful. We walked a little more. The debater continued, but more slowly and quietly, looking into the eyes of the Bishop, but he still could not guess what impression his passages were making, since the Right Reverend prayed with his eyes downcast. Then Rozanov began to lose the thread of his thoughts and repeat himself. Vladyka Feofan continued to pray silently. Finally, the guest stopped, looked at Vladyka for a long time and quietly, as if to himself, unexpectedly said: “And maybe you are right!”

An intelligent man, he himself felt the weakness of his thoughts.

Balaam. Elder Alexy. About Confession

The Valaam Monastery occupied a special place in the soul of Bishop Theophan. He loved Saint Balaam and often spoke about him with warmth.

The harsh and majestic nature of the Spaso-Preobrazhensky Monastery, one of the oldest in Rus', located on the islands of Lake Ladoga, huge as the sea, was dear to his heart. The monastery appeared back in those days when the entire surrounding land was pagan. The harsh northern climate was created by God for ascetic ascetics. The monastery includes several hermitages, as well as hermitages.

The monastic harsh custom of moving into a hermitage is touching here. When a monk expresses a desire to lead a completely lonely, silent lifestyle, is recognized as capable of this and receives the blessing of the abbot, he is given an ax, a saw, nails, a bag of crackers and taken to a desert island. There he builds himself a hut for prayer and sleep, like a coffin, in which he labors until death. His food, crackers, is brought by boat from the monastery. At the same time, not a word is uttered, for he made a vow to God to die to the world and live only about the Lord.

Valaam, 30s of the XX century


During his twenty-year stay at the St. Petersburg Theological Academy, Bishop Theophan often retired to Valaam. Recalling his travels, he said: “As soon as you get on the ship that delivers pilgrims to the monastery, you already begin to feel as if you are in a monastery. This is primarily because the entire crew on the ship are monks, everything is done with blessings and prayer.” And Vladyka also recalled: “The service in the temple ends, and I leave the temple before dismissal, so as not to embarrass the monks and pilgrims with my presence. Otherwise, like a bishop, all those praying will begin to approach him for blessing. And I will quickly leave the temple and go into the forest. And in the forest there is a fertile, indescribable beauty. Prayerful silence, as in the temple of God... Lord, what a wondrous instruction this is for unceasing prayer. Indeed, inanimate nature itself speaks about its Great Creator, about God.

For truly, by the greatness and beauty of creatures, He, the Author and Creator of their existence, is known (See: Wisdom 13:5).”

Once, in the virgin and prayerful Valaam forest, in this temple of God not made by hands, Bishop Theophan had the opportunity to experience something wondrous and blessed.

Balaam


He left, as usual, from the monastery church and retired completely to devote himself entirely to that joyful, blessed prayer, which, by the grace of God, is performed in secret. But soon he noticed a large silent crowd of people with the elder Hieroschemamonk Alexy, who was entrusted by the abbot with the obedience of teaching the people through interviews outside the church. Seeing this, Vladyka walked away and thought that he would no longer meet with this crowd. But it turned out that the elder was leading the pilgrims in the same direction. Then he decided to let the procession pass by, and then go in the opposite direction himself. The Bishop was in the thicket and from there watched the passage of the pilgrims. The elder walked ahead at a great distance from the people, and behind him walked the pilgrims, most of them women. The hieroschemamonk moved with his head bowed to the ground, occupied, according to the monastic rules, with unceasing prayer. The bishop involuntarily suddenly had a thought: “Oh, in vain Hieroschemamonk Alexy surrounds himself with these women, all of them young. There may be complaints..."

“But before I had time,” Vladyka later recalled, “to think this, the elder raised his head and, turning in my direction, said loudly, almost shouted: “And they followed Christ!”

Due to the surprise and brevity of the spoken words, no one could understand their meaning among the people and to whom they referred. Although the entire crowd heard these words and looked towards the Lord, he could not be seen behind the thick thicket. And the elder again lowered his head and plunged into the unceasing prayer commanded by the Lord.

Balaam. Worship cross at the pier of the Resurrection Skete


“Truly Elder Alexy was a great saint and a wondrous seer,” Bishop Theophan testified, “he was as beautiful as an Angel of God. At times it was difficult to look at him, he was all on fire, especially when he stood at prayer at the altar. At this time he was completely transformed, his appearance became indescribably special, extremely concentrated and stern. He really was all fiery. But he remained almost unknown to the world, because the world was unworthy.”

If the elder felt that those present at the altar were unwittingly watching him and his prayer, he tried to hide his condition with some kind of foolishness. In this case, he usually went up to the wall and, posing as an absent-minded pilgrim, straightened and smoothed the hair on his head according to his shadow on the wall.

Bishop Theophan spoke about the spiritual insight of the wondrous Elder of God Alexy. At that time, he, the young hieromonk Theophanes, a professor at the academy, went from St. Petersburg to the Valaam Monastery out of some spiritual need. He was worried about the thought: in the ascetic rules of the Holy Fathers, the monk was instructed to pay as little attention as possible to his appearance. But the Church blessed him to be a learned monk and to live and be saved in the world. But, living in the world, it is impossible to forget your flesh and not care about appearance... With this, the future Bishop Theophan entered the cell of Elder Alexy. He was going to tell him and wait for a decision, which, as the father hieromonk was completely convinced, would be God’s answer to the question posed. And this faith was not disgraced.

Balaam. Forest Psalter


Father Theophan not only received an answer, but received it with confirmation that this was precisely the will of God.

The elder, as always, received the hieromonk very, very cordially. I sat him down and asked him to wait a minute.

He himself took the mirror, put it on the table at which Father Hieromonk was sitting, took a comb and carefully combed his hair. After that, he cleared everything from the table and, turning to Father Feofan, said: “Well, now let’s talk!”

Thus, without any words, Elder Alexy gave an answer to the yet unasked question with which the father hieromonk and professor of the academy arrived at the Valaam monastery and entered the Elder’s cell.

Balaam. Prayer service on the ship


Speaking about the inhabitants of the Valaam monastery, Bishop Theophan was always touched by the fact that the old monks called the boiling water that they could get after dinner “consolation.” In monastic language, consolation is the relaxation of daily fasting on holidays.

But the Lord did not immediately lead the soul of the Master to an experienced spiritual leader, to a true, gracious, holy elder, such as Hieroschemamonk Alexy. At the beginning of his stay in St. Petersburg, student Vasily Bystrov used the advice of his confessor, whom, on the recommendations of others, he chose among the monastics of the Alexander Nevsky Lavra. One day, through the action of the devil, a considerable temptation occurred.

When Vasily came to the Lavra to confess to that hieromonk, he turned out to be drunk. Vasily was not embarrassed by this and, as if nothing had happened, confessed, took the blessing and calmly left. The next time he came to this hieromonk, he bowed to the ground and asked for forgiveness. At the same time, the monk paid tribute to Vasily for the correct attitude to what happened, for the fact that he was not embarrassed and did not condemn him. Everything turned out unexpectedly for the Confessor himself. He did not know the weakness of his body and became intoxicated with little. And the young man showed the wisdom of the Holy Fathers, the wisdom of the Gospel, remembering that in confession a person stands before the Lord, and not before man.

Hieroschemamonk Alexy of Valaam (Blinov). 1852–1900


In this regard, the recollection of one person who was lucky enough to attend confession with Archbishop Feofan himself is noteworthy: “I stood before the lectern in the corner of his cell. On the lectern there is a holy cross and the Gospel. The Archbishop read prayers before confession, and when the time came for me to tell my sins, he was not next to me, as is usually the case during confession. I involuntarily looked back. He stood in the opposite corner. And I realized that the Archbishop had left me before the cross of Christ and the Holy Gospel. This understanding, apparently, was what the Master wanted, clearly showing that I was confessing to God Himself.”

With Bishop Theophan, everything that we are accustomed to perceive mechanically, according to tradition, without meaning or inner meaning, came to life and received its original spiritual meaning.

Elders. Elders Varn and Isidore Gethsemans:

From a young age, the future Vladyka sought spiritual advice from experienced people, according to the word of the Holy Fathers. At first they were simply confessors, and then, after graduating from the academy and accepting monasticism, he was guided in his spiritual life by grace-filled, spirit-bearing elders.

The Lord turned to them on every important issue and found from them in abundance what he was looking for. He instilled in every possible way a love for the elders in the students of the academy. But the language of the old man’s allegory was not always clear to them. So, one day, on the advice of Bishop Theophan, the students went to one elder, undoubtedly blessed

and widely known. They came to him, and at that time he was washing the floor in his room. And there was a big puddle of water on the floor. Of course, the elder foresaw that “guests” were coming to him, and in order to show them their spiritual state,

a minute before they arrived, I started cleaning the floor. The students did not understand this parable then and, disappointed, returned.

“They did not understand the old man’s language,” Bishop Theophan regretted, “they did not understand what he wanted to tell and show them. After all, they came to him with a high opinion of themselves, that “we are academicians.” And the famous spirit-bearing elder, to whom great people came from all over for spiritual advice, showed them, first of all, his own humility by washing the floor in his cell. And if these young and healthy people had rushed to help the old man, dejected by years and exploits, and, first of all, had removed the large puddle of water, which, by the way, prevented them from approaching the old man to receive his blessing, they would have guessed, fortunately for themselves, that wise “word” that the great elder wanted to teach them without words. And at the same time, on the other hand, he showed them their own condition, high opinion of themselves, pride - “how are we going to wash the floor for him?” But maybe later they will understand this old man’s allegory.”

Gethsemane Chernigov monastery


Vladyka Theophan often traveled to the elders not only to Valaam, but also to the Gethsemane monastery of the Trinity-Sergius Lavra.

This monastery was founded by the famous Philaret (Drozdov), Metropolitan of Moscow.

At the beginning of the 20th century, two blessed elders labored in this monastery - Father Isidore and Father Barnabas. These elders were of the opposite nature. Father Barnabas was very strict, very zealous for the Lord, but Father Isidore, on the contrary, was gracious, very humble and infinitely merciful. All sorts of tramps and drunkards always huddled around him... And he fed everyone. Elder Isidore was repeatedly given strict remarks on this matter and was directly forbidden to feed this essentially pitiful, perishing people. But the merciful Elder took pity on them and secretly continued to feed them. However, it so happened that one of the tramps, nicknamed Fedka the Convict, always tipsy, at the devil's instigation tried to kill his breadwinner.

Venerable Barnabas of Gethsemane


Fortunately, this happened in front of many pilgrims. They interceded and saved the blessed old man from death. Fedka was tried. Elder Isidore was also called as a casualty. And the judge asks him:

- Please tell me, father, how it was?

- What happened?

- Did this criminal want to stab you?! Here is the knife that was snatched from his hands!

- Why are you bothering a person? He neither thought nor wanted to kill me.

- Why didn’t you think and didn’t want to?! After all, he rushed at you with a knife. There are so many witnesses, and they all testify the same thing against him.

-Why are you pestering him? After all, he was drunk and doesn’t remember anything... Let him go, let him go!

At the same time, the elder declared that if Fedka was not released, he would leave the monastery - “from such shame and great sin” that because of him “a man was condemned.” And they had to let the criminal go, because the Elder was highly valued and did not want to part with him. Fedka himself cried after this and asked for forgiveness from Elder Isidore. And the Elder told everyone afterwards, shaking his head self-reproachfully:

- I ended up on trial... I was put on trial. What a sin!


It happened that Elder Isidore sent his visitors to Elder Barnabas when it was necessary to thoroughly work things out so that a person would come to a sense of his sinfulness. The visitor did not have time to utter a word, but the Elder already knew in advance:

– And you, due to your need, definitely need to go to Elder Barnabas. He will help you. But this is not given to me...

- No, father, I would like to come to you!

- No no! The Lord blesses Father Barnabas. Go in peace! And tell him that I sent you to him for instruction... It’s necessary... This is the will of God!

Bishop Theophan said that elders Barnabas and Isidore complemented each other, and therefore there was great spiritual friendship and love between them.

CM. Trufanov (father Iliodor)

Among the students of the St. Petersburg Theological Academy was the monk Iliodor, who later served in Tsaritsyn. He was distinguished by spiritual ardor and increased jealousy. And the Holy Fathers warn about such people that they can easily fall into spiritual delusion, into spiritual self-delusion. This happens because, out of self-confidence and arrogance, they begin to strive for more proper humility, trusting in their own strength, and not in the Lord. And the Lord allows them, or rather, all of us, in order to enlighten us and humble us, to fall into this spiritual disease of having a high opinion of ourselves and dreams. And this is the beginning of all terrible troubles, for Scripture says: Pride goes before destruction, and arrogance before a fall.(Proverbs 16, 18).


And Bishop Theophan had to suffer a lot with this monk. In his humility, the Vladyka did not rely on himself, he invited Father Iliodor to go to the Elder, so that the Elder, according to the grace given to him, would direct his spiritual life along the right path... They gathered. We boarded the train at a small suburban station. The Bishop, in order not to give the monk an unnecessary reason to talk, walked away from him and, according to the monastic rule of keeping his mind towards God, began to engage in internal prayer. But, looking towards Father Iliodor, he saw that something was wrong with him. A dark-skinned boy, very similar to a gypsy, was spinning around him like a spinning top. The boy was doing something with his feet and hands, as if he was dancing. “Where did he come from, this gypsy kid!” – a thought flashed through Vladyka Feofan’s mind. Father Iliodor looked intently at the boy and seemed completely absorbed in him. The Bishop called the monk by name: “Father Iliodor, Father Iliodor!” But he didn't hear. After calling out, this incomprehensible “gypsy child” began to dance around him even faster, like a spinning top.

Hieromonk Iliodor, in the world S. M. Trufanov


Father Iliodor watched him intently. The Lord called him again, but he again did not hear. Vladyka approached him and saw that he was beside himself, absorbed in attention to the incomprehensible boy. “And where did he come from?!”

Then Vladyka Theophanes took him by the sleeve of his cassock and pulled him along. Only in this way was it possible to take him aside. And Father Iliodor, confused, helpless, not himself, turned pale and changed his face. Vladyka asked him what was the matter, but he just rolled his eyes in fear and could not say anything... And the “gypsy kid” disappeared without a trace, as if he had fallen through the ground...

It was all very, very strange. Only later did it become clear that this was some kind of inexplicable, but powerful demonic obsession. A rare case: during the day, in a crowded place, on the platform, in front of people.

This extraordinary incident on the way to the Elder did not bode well for Father Iliodor. Bishop Theophan told the Elder about everything that had happened in the presence of Father Iliodor. But Father Iliodor himself was in a special state, either depressed by what had happened, or absorbed, and remained completely indifferent to what the Vladyka said, as if it did not concern him. And even the words of the Elder did not affect the feelings of Father Iliodor. He remained withdrawn into himself. The elder spoke about the greatness of God and about the insignificance and sinfulness of man. That the only way to God is the path of humility. But monk Iliodor did not hear. So Vladyka Feofan and monk Iliodor returned to St. Petersburg without visible results. And here only Father Iliodor began to gradually come to his senses. But again something unlikely happened to him.

On the advice of the Elder, the Vladyka did not let Father Iliodor out of sight. The two of them, and with them another boy novice, came after the Liturgy to the Vladyka’s apartment in the academy building. The hour was around noon. The Eminence went upstairs to his place, and they remained in the lower half... And suddenly they see in the depths of the hall three giants, with faces distorted with anger, armed with clubs. Turning to Father Iliodor, shaking their clubs, they furiously shouted: “We will show you! We'll show you!"

Father Iliodor


Extremely frightened, Father Iliodor and the novice boy ran into the kitchen and locked the doors behind them. The boy grabbed a long poker and, in fear, began to break the glass in the lower floor to call for help. The Eminence ran from above, others from below hurriedly ran in. There were no faces on the victims. The boy immediately ran home to his parents. Vladika Theophanes tried to calm down Father Iliodor. He said that in monastic life one must always be prepared for such experiences. These are demonic machinations. Demons cannot be trusted in anything. Being weak, they take on the appearance of giants to scare them. What happened in broad daylight in the chambers of Bishop Theophan, the Holy Fathers call demonic insurance, demonic intimidation, when demons try to intimidate the ascetic so that he refuses to follow the ascetic path. For this purpose, they usually take on a frightening, formidable appearance, as in this case - huge, powerful giants, being, in essence, weak in strength, but very insidious and evil. And the ghost in the form of three giants, due to their cunning, pursues not one, but several goals. Having assumed a formidable appearance, they adapt their actions to the spiritual state of the person being tempted. They simply intimidated the boy, and perhaps he will refuse to follow the monastic, ascetic path in his subsequent life:

“It’s very scary!” But the main aim of their intrigues was directed at Father Iliodor. They had to knock him out of his ascetic rut. And he, undoubtedly, was frightened, and this happened in front of Bishop Feofan, as in the first case, with the “gypsy child.”

Father Iliodor graduated from the Theological Academy as a hieromonk. In the eyes of the common people, he quickly became widely known for his fiery sermons and speeches. Huge crowds flocked to him. The common people considered him their leader.

And under the influence of this, he more and more indulged in destructive pride. In the end, he dared to voluntarily put on a white metropolitan hood and appear before the people, riding on a white horse. Having reached this point, he dared to “perform” his “great miracles.” So, on the Volga he announced to the people: “On this place we will erect a temple of God in three days... Let each of you bring here one brick.

After all, there are thousands of us here! And from these bricks of the people, with God’s help, with our own hands we will erect a great temple here...”

Here is an allusion to the words of the Gospel (see: John 2, 18–21).

Iliodor had a proud thought: I will do what Christ did.

Father Iliodor in a tunic - as the “King of Galilee”


Unprecedented enthusiasm swept the crowds of people. They carried not only one brick at a time, but also carried on carts all the necessary material for building the temple...

Work was in full swing. An unprecedented miracle was created by the hands of the people. In three days the temple was ready. The self-proclaimed “Metropolitan” Iliodor solemnly “consecrated” it and performed a prayer of thanksgiving in it.

There was a deep spiritual charm in all this.

He apparently dreamed of stopping with his own hands the revolutionary ferment that had begun in Russia. But Saint Ignatius (Brianchaninov) also warned against this: “Caution is necessary against any enthusiasm for completing the work of God with human strength alone, without God acting and carrying out His work... The retreat is allowed by God: do not be tempted to stop it with your weak hand...” (“Fatherland” .

Bishop Ignatius (Brianchaninov). Phototype edition, 1963, p. 549).

It all ended more than sadly for Father Iliodor. He renounced his priesthood, quit his monkhood and got married...

Sergei Mikhailovich Trufanov, this is the worldly name of Father Iliodor, while in spiritual delusion, did many reckless things. He created his own Church of the Sun and Reason.

Later, Archbishop Feofan received letters from him from America, as from Sergei Trufanov, when he himself was already in exile. He had seven children. He realized and mourned his great sin. He wrote: “I recognize my unforgivable sins before the Holy Church and personally before you, and I ask, I beg Your Eminence to pray for me, who is perishing, in order to bring contrite repentance to the Lord and get rid of the deception in which I was!”

We cannot judge whether this was sincere repentance; we only know that Sergei Trufanov died in 1952, being a Baptist and working as a cleaner in an insurance company, at the age of seventy-one.

Grigory Evfimovich Rasputin

The God-defying power that, by the permission of the Lord, was established in Russia at the beginning of the twentieth century, as if once again confirming the words of Scripture that the whole world lies in evil(1 John 5:19), diligently slandered the name of Orthodox Russia, slandered its foundations: Orthodoxy, Autocracy and Nationality; Of course, with her unkind attention she did not ignore the bright name of Archbishop Feofan (Bystrov), confessor of the August Family, as well as the names and memory of all the people connected in one way or another with the Autocrat. A special place among these people is occupied, perhaps more than others, by the slandered Grigory Evfimovich Rasputin.

The idea that the world has about Rasputin is just a caricature of a real person. We know quite a bit of information about his early years, his youth, but they are so mixed up with legends that they can hardly be perceived as facts. Therefore, it seems necessary to preserve only those

which are important and, together, plausible. Rasputin became the central figure of a certain story, which the world has long accepted as truth. Everything written about this man is so exaggerated and confusing that it is now almost impossible for people to distinguish fact from fiction.

The first meeting of the Royal Family with Grigory Rasputin was marked by the following entry in the Tsar’s diary:

At 4 o'clock we went to Sergievka. We drank tea with Militsa and Stana.

We met the man of God – Gregory from Tobolsk province.”

In his memoirs, Prince N.D. Zhevakhov gives a description of what this name, “Man of God,” actually means: “Along with the official elder who lives according to monastic rules, in Russia there is another religious type, unknown to Europe, the so-called man of God... Unlike elders, people of God rarely live in monasteries, wandering from place to place, preaching the will of the Lord and calling people to repent. They cannot be found among monasticism and the priesthood, but, like the elders, they lead a stern, ascetic lifestyle and enjoy comparative moral authority” (pp. 265–266).

In 1900, Gregory went on a pilgrimage that lasted three years. He began his journey on the road to Kyiv, whose ancient monasteries and famous caves have been worshiped by pilgrims for centuries. On the way back I stopped in Kazan. “It was in Kazan that the glory of Rasputin was born,” testifies Spiridovich (“Rasputin.” Paris, Payot, 1935, p. 38). The spiritual circles of Kazan saw in him a devout person with a great spiritual gift. Subsequently, they introduced him to the hierarchs in St. Petersburg. Back in Kyiv, Grigory Rasputin met the Grand Duchesses Militsa Nikolaevna and Anastasia Nikolaevna at the courtyard of the St. Michael's Monastery. They liked Gregory very much, and they invited him to St. Petersburg.

Montenegrin Grand Duchesses Milica and Anastasia


Grand Duchess Milica and her sister Anastasia, Princess of Lichtenberg were known as Montenegrins.

Militsa was married to the Tsar's uncle, Grand Duke Peter Nikolaevich, and Anastasia was married to another uncle of the Tsar, Nikolai Nikolaevich. The Montenegrin women were very close to the Empress, although they soon became very jealous of Anna Vyrubova and the Empress because of the friendship between them, which intensified after Vyrubova’s divorce from her husband in 1908. Their dissatisfaction with Anna was unpleasant to Alexandra Feodorovna, and they were removed from the Court. For some time they continued to maintain good relations with Grigory Rasputin, but the latter was eventually forced to choose which side to take, and he, of course, took the side of the Empress (Furman, p. 62. Spiridovich, “Rasputin”, p. 69). After this, the Montenegrins opposed him.

Hieromartyr Bishop Hermogenes (Dolganov).

Metropolitan Sergius (Stragorodsky)


Most biographers of Grigory Rasputin failed to understand the main thing in his life. The main thing on Rasputin’s path to God was repentance, and, apparently, it was repentance that touched the two most prominent church ascetics of St. Petersburg, Archpriest John of Kronstadt and Archimandrite Feofan (Bistrov). Bishop Hermogenes of Saratov and the then rector of the Theological Academy, Bishop Sergius (Stragorodsky), were favorably disposed towards him.

Many of the Orthodox clergy in those years tried to kindle the fire of faith in parishioners, especially in persons belonging to the upper strata of society, who in the last twenty-five years had become generally indifferent to faith and spiritual issues and often considered religion more a matter of “convenience” than to others. Since spiritual censorship was abolished and all kinds of books with a wide variety of contents began to circulate freely throughout the country, the old attachment to the Mother Church became weaker and weaker, until, in the eyes of many, the Church began to look like just some kind of convention to which secular society must adapt, but which is outside this society. Grigory Rasputin appeared just at the moment when the Church hierarchs were looking for such a person. The hierarchs were concerned that the Church was losing touch even with ordinary people, and Rasputin seemed to be the ideal person who could help the Church bring the masses closer to it. He interpreted complex truths and church dogmas unexpectedly and simply.

Facsimile of Saint Righteous John of Kronstadt to Bishop Hermogenes. 1908


Vladyka Feofan, at the request of the Empress, traveled to Siberia to find out for himself about the past of Grigory Rasputin. The results of his trip did not reveal anything vicious. However, after a little time, his opinion about Rasputin seems to have changed in accordance with various reports and some confessions that he accepted. At the beginning of 1911, Bishop Feofan spoke before the Synod with a proposal to officially express displeasure to the Empress in connection with Rasputin’s behavior. Refusing, the bishops - members of the Synod told him that this matter was just for him personally as the confessor of the Empress. While at the pulpit in Crimea at that time, he visited Empress Alexandra Feodorovna when the Royal Family came to their summer residence in Livadia. In the fall of 1911, Vladyka spoke with the Empress for about an hour and a half, and the Empress, as Vladyka himself said, “was very offended.” She, of course, understood that the Vladyka had heard the slander spread not only by revolutionaries, but even by people close to the Throne.

Elder Macarius, Bishop Theophan, Grigory Rasputin in the Verkhoturye Monastery


The Tsar’s sister, Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna, wrote: “It is important to remember that Niki and Alike knew very well about Rasputin’s past. It is completely wrong to say that they considered him a saint, incapable of sin. I say it again, and I have the right to say it: they were not fooled by Rasputin and did not have the slightest illusion about him. Unfortunately, people did not know the truth, but neither Niki nor Alyx, because of their position, could fight the lies that were spreading” (Ian Worres. “The Last Grand Duchess, Her Imperial Highness Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna.” New York, p. 132).

Although the August Family retained an ardent personal affection and favor for Bishop Theophan, he was transferred from Crimea to Astrakhan in the fall of 1912, in order, apparently, to avoid awkward situations during official meetings with the Royal Family during their visits to Livadia. Rumors that the Empress, showing her displeasure, transferred him as a form of punishment seem to be incorrect, assessed after the passage of time from the Bishop’s audience with the Empress and his actual transfer to Astrakhan.

Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna


In 1913, he returned to the central region of the Empire as Archbishop of Poltava and Pereyaslavl.

Archbishop Feofan always defended the good name of the Empress Alexandra Feodorovna.

When later, already under the Provisional Government, the official question was raised about Grigory Evfimovich Rasputin and the Royal Family, then, although deprived of freedom, but still alive, it was quite natural that one of the measures of the Socialist Revolutionary Provisional Government

there was a thorough investigation of everything related to the Royal Romanov Family. A special Extraordinary Commission of the Provisional Government was formed. Its representatives visited Archbishop Feofan in Poltava. They were previously aware of the official conversation between His Grace Theophan and the Empress about Grigory Rasputin in 1911. His Eminence Archbishop Theophan categorically stated the following: “I have never had and do not have any doubts regarding the moral purity and impeccability of these relations. I officially declare this as the former confessor of the Empress. All her relationships were developed and supported solely by the fact that Grigory Evfimovich literally saved the life of his beloved son, the Heir to the Tsarevich, from death with his prayers, while modern scientific medicine was powerless to help. And if other rumors are spread among the revolutionary crowd, then this is a lie that speaks only about the crowd itself and about those who spread it, but not about Alexandra Feodorovna...”

Empress Alexandra Feodorovna


Archbishop Feofan told the Extraordinary Commission of the Provisional Government: “He (Rasputin) was neither a hypocrite nor a scoundrel. He was a true man of God who came from the common people. But under the influence of high society, which could not understand this simple man, a terrible spiritual catastrophe occurred, and he fell. The environment that wanted this to happen remained indifferent and considered everything that happened to be something frivolous.”

St. Petersburg high society played a major role in this sad story. It surrounded the Siberian peasant with all sorts of temptations, which he found very difficult to resist. Using him with the aim of getting closer to the Royal Family and, moreover, with the aim of discrediting Her, they acted extremely cruelly towards him.

Great Livadia Palace


Much has been written regarding the perceived immorality of Rasputin, attributing various downfalls to him, and constitutes, perhaps, the largest literature on this topic about one person. Much was invented for the sake of personal gain and empty gossip; a lot of bad things surrounded the Emperor. The most dishonest and malicious, and also widely trusted, slanderers of Grigory Rasputin were Prince Felix Yusupov, the organizer of the murder of Rasputin, and Sergei Trufanov, the former hieromonk Iliodor, who tried to blackmail Empress Alexandra Feodorovna with an absurd story about her imaginary relationship with a peasant who prayed so fervently for the recovery of her child. When she did not succumb to blackmail, Trufanov found a publisher in New York who cared as little about the truth as the author himself.

One of the most interesting descriptions of Russia during this period can be found in a book by Gerard Shelley entitled "The Speckled Domes: Episodes from the Life of an Englishman in Russia." In this book, the author talks about his meeting with Rasputin in April 1915. He testifies how Gregory was constantly pushed into sin by the people around him, who themselves had long ago lost all semblance of decency. J. Shelley's descriptions of his meetings with Grigory Rasputin, as well as with Empress Alexandra Feodorovna, shed new and kind light on this period of Russian history.

Prince Felix Yusupov


Princess Catherine Radziwill wrote: “Unfortunately, the murder of Rasputin did not break the people who used him. It did not put an end to many of the abuses which had led Russia to the terrible state of chaos in which she found herself at the moment of her greatest trial. The man himself was only a banner, and the loss of the banner did not mean that the regiment that carried him shared his fate...” (Princess Catherine Radziwill. “Rasputin and the Russian Revolution.” New York, Lane, 1918, pp. 184–185) .

Vladyka Feofan never called Rasputin by his last name, but called him only by his first name and patronymic: “Grigory Evfimovich” - or “Elder Grigory”.

Sarov. Predictions of Blessed Pasha of Sarov

On his way back from Siberia, Bishop Theophan stopped to pray at the Sarov monastery. Notified by telegram of his arrival, the authorities of the monastery sent a secular person to meet the “courtier” Vladyka at the railway station, reasoning that the confessor of the Royal Family was probably a more secular person than a spiritual person, in order to keep the “capital bishop” occupied with secular conversation. But during the entire trip in the carriage, Bishop Feofan, in response to all the “small talk,” remained silent. And the offended greeter had no idea that the Vladyka was immersed in his unchanging, unceasing prayer.

Upon arrival at the monastery, Bishop Theophan asked the Hegumen to give him the opportunity to pray alone in the cell of the Monk Seraphim, the same one in which the holy Elder departed to the Lord. When Vladyka prayed, no one dared to disturb him. But, after quite a long time, the brethren were alarmed that the Vladyka did not come out for a long time. Finally we decided to enter. And they found Bishop Theophan in a deep faint. Bishop Theophan did not consider it necessary to talk about what happened to him. And this circumstance seemed to everyone “somehow mysterious and incomprehensible.” However, there is no doubt that Saint Theophan turned with fervent prayer to the Lord, to the Most Holy Theotokos, to the Monk Seraphim. And who knows where his soul was at that time?

Out of humility, Vladyka kept silent about what happened to him during prayer in the cell of St. Seraphim, but he later told about what happened to him in the cell of the blessed holy fool Pasha of Sarov, who lived in the Diveyevo monastery.

The young Bishop of Simferopol and Tauride Feofan visited the blessed one in 1911. He was not wearing episcopal vestments, and he himself did not reveal to her that he was a bishop. But according to her gift of insight, this was not necessary. She already knew who was in front of her.

The wondrous servant of God uttered two prophecies.

One concerning the Royal Family, extremely important for Russia, and the other had personal significance for Bishop Theophan. The old woman - a holy fool for Christ's sake - spoke little, but Vladyka Theophan was given the opportunity to learn a lot then.

Venerable Seraphim of Sarov


The blessed one suddenly jumped onto the bench, grabbed the portrait of the Sovereign Emperor Nicholas II Alexandrovich, which was hanging on the wall, and threw it on the floor. Then she quickly grabbed the portrait of the Empress Alexandra Feodorovna and also threw it on the floor. Then she ordered the cell attendant to take the portraits into the attic.

This was six years before the 1917 coup d'etat.

Having returned to the Tauride (Crimean) diocese, Vladyka considered it necessary to bring to the attention of the Most August Monarch what the Lord revealed to the blessed Christ for the sake of the holy fool Pasha of Sarov and what she predicted without words.

“When I,” recalled Bishop Theophan, “recounted to the Emperor all the actions of the blessed one, the Emperor stood silently, bowing his head. He didn't say a word about what I said. Apparently it was very difficult for him to listen to this prophecy of the seer. Only at the very end did he thank me. And this providence of the wondrous servant of God, given to her by God Himself, came true six years later.”

With this terrible prediction, the blessed one repeated the prophecies of St. Seraphim of Sarov, the elders of Optina, the Glinsk elder Schema-Archimandrite Iliodor, the insights of Father John of Kronstadt and other predictions of Russian seers, already known to the Emperor. The second prediction of the wondrous servant of God, blessed Pasha of Sarov, applied personally to Bishop Theophan.

The blessed one threw some kind of lump of white matter onto the lap of the Eminence. When he unwrapped it, it turned out to be a dead man's shroud.

“That means death!.. But God’s will be done!” – thought the Lord.

I. Repin. Portrait of Emperor Nicholas II on the porch. 1896


But at that moment Pasha ran up and snatched the shroud from her hands. At the same time, she quickly seemed to mutter: “The Mother of God will deliver!.. The Most Holy Lady will save!”

Pasha Sarovskaya


This prediction about the fatal illness of Vladyka Theophan and about the mercy of God, revealed through the prayers of the Most Holy Theotokos, came true many years later, when Vladyka lived in one of the monasteries in Yugoslavia.

At the Simferopol and Astrakhan departments

In 1910, through the concerns of the Royal Family, Vladyka was transferred from St. Petersburg to the Crimea, to the See of Simferopol, since the climate of the Northern capital, with rain and fog, was not suitable for his poor health. He was relieved to part with St. Petersburg and move to sunny Crimea. The August Family visited here often. Bishop Theophan's stay in Crimea was the highest expression of his close proximity to the August Family. So, for example, he told how the Tsar’s Children brought him wild berries they had collected, “so fragrant,” and how the little Heir passed it from hand to hand. He said that he received grapes from the royal vineyards for a special course of treatment. The Bishop often used the royal car to visit the mountains, marvel at the beauty of God’s nature and breathe in the clean, intoxicating mountain air. He lived in close proximity to them, and they surrounded him with care.

Bishop Theophan often recalled how he served Divine Liturgies in the palace. How the Empress and the Royal Daughters sang in the choir. The singing was always prayerful and concentrated.

The Bishop said: “With what sublime, holy reverence they sang and how they read during this service! In all this there was a genuine, lofty, purely monastic spirit. And with what trepidation, with what bright tears they approached the Holy Chalice!..”

Tsarevich Alexey Nikolaevich


Bishop Theophan recalled the piety and faith of the Tsar himself: “The Tsar always began every weekday with prayer in church. At exactly eight o'clock in the morning he entered the palace temple. By this time, the serving priest had already preliminarily performed the proskomedia and read the hours. With the entrance of the King, the priest made an exclamation: “Blessed is the Kingdom of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, now and ever and unto ages of ages.” And exactly at nine o'clock the Liturgy ended. It should be noted that there were no omissions or abbreviations. And there was no impression that the priest or the choir were in a hurry.

The secret was that there were absolutely no pauses.

This made it possible to finish the Mass in one hour. For a priest this was an indispensable condition.

The Emperor always prayed very earnestly. Every request of the litany, every prayer found a living response in his soul.

After the service, the Tsar’s working day began.

Royal car


A few months after the highest audience with the Empress regarding Grigory Rasputin, Archbishop Feofan was transferred to the Astrakhan See. Rumors spread that the Empress was angry with the Vladyka and therefore immediately removed him from Crimea. But Bishop Theophan was appointed Bishop of Astrakhan on June 25, 1912, more than six months after his meeting with Empress Alexandra Feodorovna. The Emperor himself wrote in his diary that he received Vladyka three days after Easter, March 28/April 10, 1912, in the palace in Livadia: “Received Bishop Theophan at 12 o’clock.”

Here, in Astrakhan, in an area with a harsh continental climate, with very hot summers and very cold winters, Vladyka received severely debilitating malaria. The attack began almost instantly, and if Vladyka was at a service in the cathedral, he would hide in a corner and often even lose consciousness. The service continued, the crisis passed, and consciousness returned. The attacks were so severe that afterward he could barely move. A long-standing throat disease also worsened, and tuberculosis of the throat began.

Royal Children


In Astrakhan, a high-profile incident occurred with the Saint of Christ, weak in body, but strong in the spirit of faith. On the name day of the Sovereign Emperor Nikolai Alexandrovich, His Grace Theophan, Bishop of Astrakhan, came out with the clergy for a prayer service for the health of the Sovereign Emperor in the middle of the cathedral. But in front of the Bishop, closer to the altar, stood some kind of Mohammedan, judging by his clothes, as it turned out later, the Consul of Persia, in a magnificent outfit, with orders and a saber, with a turban on his head. The Bishop, pale, weak and sick, through the deacon asked the consul to step aside or stand with the officials, with the generals at the Bishop's pulpit. The Consul remained in place and did not answer the Bishop’s request. The Bishop, after waiting a few minutes, sent the rector of the cathedral with a request not to stand between the altar and the Bishop and the clergy, but to step aside.

The consul doesn't move. The bishop waits and does not begin the official prayer service. And in the cathedral all the authorities of the province and the city are gathered, all the military in full dress uniform. On the square in front of the cathedral there are soldiers lined up for parade.

They again approach the consul and ask him to step aside and not stand between the clergy and the altar, especially in such a demonstrative outfit. Instead of answering, the consul points to his watch, and then angrily says: “Tell your Bishop that it is high time to start a prayer service, as indicated in the official schedule, a prayer service for the well-being of the Sovereign Emperor. For the delay, he, your Bishop, will be responsible for his stubbornness. I delayed the prayer service for a whole half hour!”

Assumption Cathedral in the Astrakhan Kremlin


When Bishop Theophan was informed of the consul’s answer, he asked me to tell him: “You are delaying the prayer service, not me. And until you step aside, the prayer service will not begin.” And after the words of the Most Reverend Bishop were conveyed to the consul, he defiantly left the cathedral, his eyes sparkling and muttering threats to the Bishop. As soon as he left his place, the Bishop quietly said in a weak, painful voice: “Blessed is our God always, now and ever and unto ages of ages!” All the worshipers breathed a sigh of relief. The prayer service began, the choir began to sing.

Bishop Theophan with his disciple Father Joasaph (Skorodumov), future Archbishop of Canada, in Astrakhan


And the Persian consul at that time was a very influential person at court. The political course then was towards rapprochement with Persia.

And his threat came true. He immediately sent an indignant denunciation against the “impudent Bishop who disrupted the prayer service for the welfare of the Sovereign Emperor.” The Persian diplomat did not hesitate to portray the action of His Grace Theophan in the darkest colors, as a conscious political demonstration of the “exiled Bishop.” And the weak and sick Bishop Theophan gave himself entirely into the hands of God and awaited the royal wrath. But it turned out the other way around.

The Sovereign and Empress were convinced by the incident that Bishop Theophan was acting regardless of human faces, as the sacred duty of an Orthodox Bishop told him to do.

Soon, His Grace Theophan was transferred from Astrakhan to Poltava with an increase in rank: Archbishop of Poltava and Pereyaslavl.

But before this, while awaiting a thunderstorm from the capital, Bishop Theophan was honored with a blessed vision during the All-Night Vigil in the church.

He later recalled: “There was such sorrow in my heart over the denunciation of the Persian consul, and I was so sick... And once, while at a service in the cathedral, I saw the Holy Great Martyr Theodore Stratilates on the High Place in ancient shining armor... Oh, Lord !

Holy Great Martyr Theodore Stratelates


What a joy it was for me! How it supported me! All my sadness and bodily weakness instantly disappeared. I realized that the Lord approves of my standing for His Holy Truth and that is why he sent me, weak, such a marvelous Great Martyr in courage... Oh, how all this encouraged and cheered me!”

Regarding what happened in Astrakhan with the Persian consul on the day of the Angel of the Emperor, in connection with his denunciation to the Emperor, a certain perspicacious schema-nun Evgenia, an old woman confined to her bed by a long-term illness, wrote to Bishop Theophan: “I see a dream. Menacing, black clouds covered the entire sky. But suddenly Saint Joasaph of Belgorod appears. He reads the long manuscript and tears it up. And at that moment the bright sun breaks through the clouds. They quickly disappear, and only the gentle sun shines welcomingly from the sky... Glory to the Lord God!”

When the Bishop arrived at the station and entered the train, the flock, out of love for him, naturally took a desperate step: the crying people lay down on the rails and thereby tried to prevent their departure. People lay there for a long time until it was possible to call them to order.

It was clear that behind this translation there was a royal blessing to Bishop Theophan in connection with his confessional firmness.

The Christians of Astrakhan saw off their Bishop, the true Saint of Christ, with inconsolable weeping.

At the Poltava department

The first impression of the newly appointed Archpastor to Poltava was very sad. The cathedral was empty during services. And the Archpastor turns with fervent prayer to the Lord God, so that the Lord will arouse spiritual zeal in his new flock and kindle a thirst for repentance in their souls.

And the Lord’s prayer was heard. The temple was filled with more and more worshipers every day. The Bishop's prayerful concentration was transferred to the clergy. The people immediately felt this, people began to pray fervently. The Lord’s quiet sermons, spoken in a prophetic spirit, made a huge impression on the believers, not on his own behalf, but on behalf of the saints of God, who foreshadowed terrible events in Russia and in the world that would come very soon. The words of Bishop Theophan acted like thunderclaps. Divine services in the Assumption Cathedral in Poltava have been transformed.

Poltava


It is interesting to make a short digression here to talk about how Vladyka prayed. He read secret prayers during divine services incredibly quickly. This ability was apparently affected by the skill of unceasing prayer, performed secretly in the soul. The concelebrating priests did not have time to read the same prayers, and the Bishop was already giving the sign of the exclamation following the prayer. This was especially evident in the first part of the Liturgy, in the Liturgical Canon, where all prayers and exclamations represent a single whole. At the same time, Vladyka was extremely tense and concentrated. Deep in prayer, he apparently did not notice the time; he read secret prayers incredibly quickly, as if “in one breath,” since he read not so much the words as the thought of the prayer.


Bishop Theophan turned his main attention to the bishop's choir. He found a special regent who had sung in the choir since childhood and understood what church singing should be like. It was priest Victor Clement, who organized a bishop's choir of fifty people, thirty boys and twenty adults. The assistant regent was Deacon Nikita Milodan, with a high tenor of exceptional splendor.

But besides the bishop’s cathedral choir, there was another, small bishop’s choir, which sang daily in the church of the bishop’s house, in the Church of the Cross. This choir consisted of seven people, three boys, all violas, and four adults. In this church, services were performed according to the monastery charter. Bishop Theophan was sure to attend services, except on Sundays and holidays, when he was in the cathedral. In the house church, as in the cathedral, there were always many people praying.

Bishop Theophan paid special attention to the training of choristers. For this purpose, a Singing School was organized in the diocese, in which they learned to sing correctly, churchly from childhood. The disciples lived at the bishop's house and were fully supported by the diocese. They studied general sciences according to the secondary school curriculum, but the main focus was on church singing. Singers were required to know the words of the chant by heart. Each graduate of the school first of all acquired a strict taste for the choice of chants, and in addition, received a stock of knowledge and practice in managing a choir. Children's voices from Poltava were considered the best in Russia.

The choir created by Bishop Theophan eventually became outstanding. And not only in terms of singing technique - he conveyed to the worshiper the true prayerful spirit of the Holy Church, and not “church music” according to the Western model. The entire divine service acquired a touching and prayerful character.

The bishop's choir gave spiritual concerts in some cities of the Poltava diocese. A famous composer was present at one of the concerts. He became very interested in the choir and invited several boy choir members to join him. When the boys arrived, he invited them to sing “in a mask,” the notes were without words. They started, and then stopped, saying that in the choir they are not required to know the notes, that they sing by ear, and carry the melody and words in their memory. The composer was triumphant, rubbing his hands, he repeated: “I caught it, I caught it!.. The boys don’t know the notes!” The composer discovered a “major flaw” in the magnificent choir. But he looked from the point of view of a professional, an artist, and not from a church, religious-ascetic one.

In Russia the people are naturally musical. Simple people who do not know notes sing beautifully, using their innate hearing. They carry singing within themselves, in their musical memory. And they keep church singing and church motifs within themselves. Everything is in their memory: both the words of the chants and the melodies. At night and without light they will sing chants with the same success as during the day. Their attention is focused on the divine service; they sing, praying with their souls, and when they sing, they pray. This is difficult to achieve from an artist who sings from notes.

The composer could not understand this. But you can be convinced of the validity of what we have said if you listen to a choir of artists performing church singing. From a musical point of view, they will perform the chant accurately, but often coldly, not conveying the spirit of prayer that is hidden in church chant. Conversely, a choir consisting of believers, from the point of view of musical performance, will be inferior to them in many respects, but it will convey the main thing - the spirit of prayer. Therefore, the maestro’s reproach that “the choir boys of a wonderful choir sing from memory without knowing the notes” meant nothing at all for this choir.

Through the efforts of the new Bishop, the cathedral and its services were transformed in a short time, and the flock responded to these concerns with touching love and devotion. It became known that through the Vladyka’s prayers to the Lord, healings of the sick and other signs of grace were performed.


Kind and forgiving, he became completely different when he was in the altar: here he was strict and stern and inspired awe. One day, with a large gathering of communicants, a certain A.P. entered the altar along with the church servants, hoping to receive communion out of turn. For the rest of his life he remembered that menacing whisper with which the Vladyka sent him out. This entire group of people found themselves behind everyone else in the church, and they were the very last to approach the Chalice. During a conversation at home, the Bishop forbade A.P. for the rest of his life entering the altar. “But I’m not a woman,” he tried to object. “Do you perhaps consider yourself a better woman?” - “What about the priest?” “Yes, a priest is a person like everyone else, but when he stands before the Throne in vestments at the altar, then he is equal to an angel. He bears great responsibility for his presence during worship.” At the same time, the Bishop prohibited A.P. any thought about the priesthood or monasticism. And this is not only because his past single life was chaotic, and not as a personal condemnation of him, but because, as a result of his past life, access from dark forces would have been open to him, he would not have been able to repel the attack.

When required, Vladyka showed great severity. When he toured his diocese, priests of the modern type were afraid to show themselves to him. Such people could always hear: “And you, father, would you be so kind as to go to such and such a monastery for a month!” But he said this very softly and delicately when he saw that the priest had a beard and hair cut too noticeably short or something like that.

A typical day for Bishop Theophan at that time in Poltava was distributed as follows. He got up from sleep in the second half of the night and performed his prayer rule. In the morning, when the bells rang, he went to the house church, where the next hieromonk performed the morning service and the Divine Liturgy. After the Liturgy, Vladyka drank coffee and retired to his office, where he dealt with diocesan affairs, and then moved on to his favorite reading of the Holy Fathers. I wrote a lot. Afternoon – lunch. If the weather permitted, he went out briefly into the garden and, while walking, prayed the unceasing Jesus Prayer. Then he retired to the office again.

When the bell rang for Vespers, I went to church. After Vespers - reception of visitors. There were so many visitors that Vladyka got very tired. After dinner there is free time for interviews with the clergy and office work.

Assumption Cathedral in Poltava


The furnishings of his office were very simple. In the corner there was an iron bed with boards instead of a mattress, on which Vladyka sometimes slept a little. There were many icons, Vladyka prayed in front of them for a long time, with a candle in his hand, despite the lit lamps. His meal was very simple, and he ate very little. Occasionally he went out into the garden to get some fresh air. When he was very overtired, exhausted from the receptions, he retired for several days to the Lubensky Spaso-Preobrazhensky Monastery. Having rested a little, he again took up the same work.


One day, the parents of a young man, spiritually close to Archbishop Feofan, complained to him that their only son, whom they loved very much, had completely gotten out of hand: he came home late at night and was not sober. I completely forgot the way to church. (But he was such a pious boy!) And what to do with him now? The parents asked for the Vladyka’s prayers for the perishing person.

And soon it happened that the son returned at night very drunk, became rowdy in the house, swore badly, and did not get up the next morning. Some kind of illness incomprehensible to doctors happened to him. He did not eat or speak, tossed about in bed like crazy, and became very weak with a very high fever. His parents had already lost hope for his recovery; they begged Vladyka to pray for him.

The patient was unconscious, moaned, screamed, and then came to his senses, but he himself, apparently, had already despaired of life, since he could neither eat nor speak. And in this state, he saw, either in a dream or in reality, some monk who sternly told him: “If you do not correct yourself, if you do not leave the path of sin that you are following, then you will certainly die and perish!”

The patient tearfully promised the Elder that he would improve. And after that, little by little he was able to eat, and then his speech returned. The unknown illness left him, and he began to recover quickly. And as soon as he got to his feet, the first thing he did was go to the cathedral, pray fervently and repent with tears. And after the service, he and all the pilgrims came under the blessing of the Bishop. And what was his amazement when in the Bishop he recognized the old man who spoke to him at night and to whom he promised to improve.

From that time on, the young man reformed and often visited the Bishop, thanked him for his holy prayers, cried and begged for forgiveness and again made a promise to live like a Christian. Is it necessary to talk about how grateful this young man’s parents were to the Archbishop?


Here, in Poltava, there was another case. Wealthy parents also complained about their son that he did not value parental advice not to follow the path that he followed under the influence of dissolute friends: through frequent night absences, drinking bouts and carousing. His parents themselves, being wealthy, spoiled him with money. But they came to the Archbishop and sighed and even cried. And when Archbishop Theophan, referring to the Divine Scripture and the Holy Fathers, advised them not to give their son money, to keep him strictly and to punish him, the parents objected to him: “No, no, we will raise him with love, in the Christian spirit. And when he grows up, he will understand and appreciate our sensitive upbringing.”

After this, the Lord fell silent. The son grew, and with age he became worse and worse. Before he asked for money, but now he began to demand it and steal it from his parents. Parents - again to the Lord for advice: what to do and what to do? The Bishop answered them: “Didn’t I give you advice, but not from myself: be stricter with your son. Are these my words? You yourself can read about this in the word of God and from the Holy Fathers. They clearly say that children should be raised in strictness, but without cruelty. This is the kind of education that children themselves will later understand and appreciate with gratitude.”

But the parents are again their own, again preaching a false, liberal education: “Won’t our son really appreciate our love for him?” “But true Christian love must also be expressed in severity. You must be fair and strict. Love demands this, true love for your son. You yourself will understand later how deeply you were mistaken. It will be too late!”

And how did it all end? The son took a criminal path, and his compassionate parents cursed him and deprived him of his inheritance. And when they came again with bitter weeping to Vladyka Theophan, they said that they had gravely sinned with their “upbringing” by not listening to his advice.

Recalling this incident later, Vladyka said: “Yes, some parents, before raising their own children, should be educated themselves, or rather, re-educated in the Christian spirit. Then what happened to this family would not have happened!”


But here is the story of the wife of the professor of the Poltava Theological Seminary L.V.I. about what happened in their family.

In 1915, her son, an officer who had a fiancee in Poltava, came on leave from the theater of military operations. This officer's leave ended on Easter week. The newlyweds wanted to get married before the groom left.

L.V. knew Vladyka Feofan closely, and he loved their entire family. And L.V. came to Vladyka and asked for a blessing to get married on one of the days of Easter week. The Bishop, always attentive and ready to help anyone who asks, this time thought sadly and said that he wanted to first look at the canons, and then he would give his answer.

A few days later, the groom’s mother again came to Vladyka. The Bishop firmly said: “I cannot bless the marriage of your children on these Easter days, I have no right, since the Church does not allow this, and it will be a great misfortune for the young people if they do not listen to the Church.”

The mother was terribly upset and said a lot of unpleasant things to the Archbishop. She believed that the Lord, as a strict ascetic, did not understand life and therefore did not allow marriage under completely exceptional conditions.

Despite the Bishop's prohibition, there was a priest who agreed to perform their marriage. Having gotten married, the officer left, leaving his young wife in Poltava. But from that moment on, his trace was lost. Despite all the efforts of his mother and young wife, no one could tell them where he was or what happened to him.

Talking about this, L.V. cried a lot. She said later: “How great Vladyka Archbishop Theophan was!.. And how little we valued him, did not understand and did not obey.”


Poltava residents knew how the Lord healed the sick through the prayers of Bishop Theophan and how the Lord protected many from sin with his prayers. But if someone did not listen to him, then he himself brought punishment upon himself.

Several times, at the request of believers, Bishop Theophan informed them about the afterlife fate of a deceased relative. Thus, a pious family lived in Poltava: a husband and wife who loved Bishop Theophan. Her husband died, and the widow in her simplicity asked: “Holy Lord, tell me for the sake of Christ, will the Lord reveal to you what the fate of my dear deceased is?”

The archbishop answered her that if God wills, then perhaps after some time he will be able to answer this question for her, but on the condition of mutual prayer about it. The Bishop prayed and gave the saddened widow a completely comforting answer: “The all-merciful Lord forgave him and had mercy!”


Some wealthy people had two maids, one of whom died unexpectedly. And after her death, they discovered the disappearance of a certain amount of money. The owners accused the surviving servants of stealing the money. The accused assured the owners of her innocence and non-involvement in this loss, but logic itself made her suspect this maid that she, taking advantage of the death of her friend, stole money. She cried bitterly and fervently prayed to the Queen of Heaven, so that the Mother of God would reveal the secret loss of money. And the All-Holy Lady showed the place where the money was to Vladyka Theophan. The deceased maid hid them for greater safety, but did not have time to say so. And the missing money was found in the place indicated by the Lord. Thus, the innocent woman was freed from suspicion of stealing money. As for Bishop Theophan, he had never been to this house and the owners were not familiar to him.


Another incident happened even earlier, when he was in the Crimea, at the Simferopol department. A certain young man, already dead, appeared to Vladyka Theophanes.

Vladyka knew him personally. And this deceased young man asked him for holy prayers. He explained that he was now going through terrible ordeal places and was very afraid for himself, lest he be detained at one of them. But there are many of them, twenty-one ordeals...

The Bishop prayed for the repose of his soul and for the unhindered passage of all the ordeals. And after this, the young man appeared a second time, thanked the Saint for his holy prayers and asked to perform a thanksgiving prayer service. The Bishop was surprised and answered him:

“But you are dead. We need to serve memorial services for you, not prayer services.”

To this the deceased replied: “I was told so, they allowed it there... After all, we are all alive there, and there are no dead among us!”

At the same time, the deceased told how the transition from earthly, temporary life to endless, eternal life takes place.


The cell attendant of Bishop Theophan, who eventually became Bishop Joasaph, asked him a question about the afterlife of one Belgorod bishop, who was found as if hanged in the restroom of the bishop's courtyard: “Has his soul perished?”

To this, Archbishop Theophan replied: “The bishop did not die because he did not commit suicide: the demons did this through deception.”

Bishop Joasaph (Skorodumov) is working on the construction of the Church of St. Seraphim of Sarov


The fact is that the bishop's house was being rebuilt. And before there was a house church. But the builders, who were godlessly inclined, deliberately, with a blasphemous purpose, arranged it so that where there had previously been an altar and the Holy See stood, they made a restroom. And when sacred places are desecrated in this way or by committing murder or suicide, the grace of God is removed from there and demons take up residence there. Whether the bishop in question was guilty and, if so, to what extent he was guilty of allowing this blasphemy, there is no data. But it is clear that he became one way or another a victim of demonic malice.


Once, Bishop Theophan spoke about a curious incident when he was at the see of Poltava. The diocesan administration received a statement from one parish that their priest was practicing black magic, “casting spells.” He used to be red, but one night he turned black, and then gradually turned purple, and now all his hair has turned green. I had to call this priest. And the priest said with tears: “My mother kept pestering me, red-haired and red-haired, if only he dyed his beard. So I painted it black. And the black one began to fade, over time it changed to purple, and now the beard has turned green. Forgive for Christ's sake! There was no witchcraft here, but simple cowardice!

Vladyka Archbishop, answering the priest, said: “Your mistake is that you led “these little ones” into temptation. Without understanding what was going on here, they essentially did the right thing. So there is no need to blame them for this. In their own way they are right. You need to ask all of them for forgiveness. And from now on you must be more careful. I am not assigning penance to you, you yourself are a priest, impose penance on yourself.”

This is how Archbishop Theophan (Bystrov) labored in his holy feat at the Poltava See. The pre-war and war years of the First World War passed.

The pious people of Poltava saw with their own eyes how fruitful the Bishop’s labors were, and responded to his prayerful and administrative labors with touching love and devotion. The flock revered in their Archpastor a strong man of prayer. In the people's love there was not only deep respect for the shrine of the dignity, but it was also revered for its ascetic life. Nationwide love took on touching forms when the Bishop arrived at the temple to serve on the holiday: the steps of the temple and its entire path were strewn with flowers. And this picture was striking in its contrast: through living, bright flowers, beautiful and fragrant, a pale and thin man walked - a man not of this world. However, he himself did not take these honors to himself personally, but accepted them as a symbol of the bishop’s path: “So let your light shine before men, so that they may see your good deeds and glorify our Father who is in heaven, always, now and ever and forever and ever, amen!”

God's Anointed - Sovereign Emperor Nicholas II. Sin of the Russian people

In July 1914, war began with Germany and its allies. Quite naturally, military operations greatly worried Vladyka Theophanes. After initial successes on all fronts, the Russian army was forced, due to a lack of ammunition, to go on the defensive. Under the influence of world military authorities and the world press, the General Staff erroneously calculated that the expected war would be short, just a few months.

During the transition to passive defense, losses in killed and wounded increased. The patriotic duty of the home front is to help the army. At the call of the Poltava archpastor, Poltava readily opened military hospitals for the wounded.

And Archbishop Feofan himself went to live in the seminary, and, having converted his house, transferred it to a military hospital.

The last days of 1916 brought joyful and sad experiences to Bishop Theophan.

The Sovereign Emperor arrived in Poltava, unexpectedly for everyone, from the Front Headquarters as the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of all the Armed Forces of Russia. After the first retreats on the German front due to a lack of ammunition, Russia now strained its efforts, and, while supplying the front, they wrote on each box: “Don’t spare ammunition!”

Russia was preparing for an all-out offensive. And the Emperor arrived in Poltava inspired by the undoubted hope of military success. He arrived in Poltava precisely in order to ask the Lord for a new victory for Russia, at the site of the God-given victory of Peter the Great on June 27, 1709 over the Swedish king Charles XII, with the participation of the Bishop, whom he knew well and whom he completely trusted.

Grand Duchesses in the infirmary


A prayer service for the granting of victory was served by Bishop Theophan in the presence of the Sovereign Emperor Nikolai Alexandrovich in the Poltava Cathedral. But Bishop Theophan himself, knowing about the terrible prophecies, was not sure that the Lord would forgive the sins of the people and cancel His word about the fate of Russia, for the Russia of 1916 was not before Him the Russia of 1709. A clear understanding of this filled the Vladyka’s soul with deep sorrow and anxiety for the fate of Russia. If then there was one traitor and traitor, now there were an innumerable number of them.

Bishop Theophan thanked God for the August visit to his diocese with such a pious purpose, for the Royal mercy, which testified to the former trust and love for him personally, but that joy was against the backdrop of formidable prophecies about Russia.

Not only the enemies of Russia, but also the insidious “allies” then threw millions into the moral decay of the Russian rear. Revolutionaries of all stripes received enormous funds to conduct subversive propaganda behind the back of the valiant Russian army. Part of the intelligentsia and military leadership, having forgotten about their sacred duty to the Sovereign and the Motherland, succumbed to suicidal sedition. The revolutionary swing of the entire edifice of the Empire even reached the supreme power. Some blind leaders(Matthew 15:14) stated: “The worse, the better.”

The highest generals isolated the Sovereign not only from the people, but even from his Family. The Emperor did not know what was happening to his Family, and the Family did not know what was happening to him. Among “his own people” he was like a prisoner. Faced with the threat of removal from power, he said: “There is no sacrifice that I would not make in the name of the real good of Russia and for its salvation.”

Archbishop Theophan, who managed to get to know the Royal Family so closely and appreciate its pure, holy, Christian way of life and the exalted appearance of the Royal Persons, was shocked to the core by the announced abdication of the Sovereign.

In October 1917, some atheists were replaced in power by others - the democrats were replaced by Social Democrats and Bolsheviks. Their leader, Lenin, shouted at the rally: “We, good gentlemen, don’t give a damn about Russia!”

And everywhere in the country, an unprecedented destruction in history began of people disliked by the authorities, and there were millions of them!

Sovereign Nicholas II at the Headquarters of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief


The consequence of the removal of God's Anointed One from power was a split in society due to the rupture of the connecting spiritual thread between Father the Tsar and the people, his children, approved and embodied in Russian existence by the hand of God.

The prediction of the old woman - Christ for the sake of the holy fool Pasha of Sarov, conveyed by the Right Reverend Theophan in 1911 to the Emperor personally, as well as the predictions of many holy saints of God began to come true.

The Russian people forgot the Lord God, rejected the oath given by their forefathers, the oath of allegiance to God and His Sovereign. And no one openly raised the banner of the All-Russian Council of 1613, no one remained faithful to what was bequeathed in the “Approved Charter”, which reads:


“IN THE NAME OF THE FATHER AND THE SON AND THE HOLY SPIRIT

Approved Certificate

Great All-Russian Council in Moscow,

Tserkovnago and Zemskago, 1613.

The Lord sent His Holy Spirit into the hearts of all Orthodox Christians (of our Land), as with one mouth I cry out to be (...) Tsar (...) and Autocrat to You, the Great Sovereign Mikhail Feodorovich.

Everyone kissed the Life-Giving Cross and made a vow that for the Great Sovereign, revered by God, the God-chosen and God-beloved Tsar (...) and for their Royal Children, whom God will henceforth give to them, the Sovereigns, lay down their souls and heads and serve them, To our sovereigns, with faith and truth, with all our souls and heads.

And another Sovereign, past the Sovereign Tsar (ours) - (...) and Their Royal Children, whom God will give to Them, the Sovereigns, from now on, look for and want another Sovereign from whatever people you may be, or whatever kind of evil you want to do; then we, the boyars, and the okolnichi, and the nobles, and the clerks, and the merchants, and the children of the boyars, and all kinds of people stand against that traitor with all the earth for one.

Having read this Approved Charter at the Great All-Russian Council and having listened to a greater strengthening for all eternity - to be so in everything because it is written in this Approved Charter. And whoever does not want to listen to this Council Code, God bless him, and begins to speak differently and spread rumors among people, then such a one, whether from the sacred rank, and from the Boyars, Royal Synclites, and military, or anyone from ordinary people , and in whatever rank you may be, according to the sacred rules of the Holy Apostle, and the Seven Ecumenical Councils of the Holy Fathers, and Local; and according to the Council Code he will be deposed of everything, and excommunicated from the Church of God, and the Holy Communion of Christ; as a schismatic of the Church of God and of all Orthodox Christianity, a rebel and destroyer of the Law of God, and according to the Royal Laws he accepts revenge; and our humility and the entire consecrated Council, do not bring blessings on it from now to eternity. May it be firm and indestructible in the preceding years, in the generations of Herods, and not a single line will pass away from what is written in it (in the Approved Charter) (...)"


The Russian people sinned by succumbing to the atheists, departing from the covenants of their fathers, leaving the Anointed of God alone in the most difficult moment and allowing the terrible crime of regicide.

Temptations from Renovationists and Ukrainian Independentists

As a diocesan Bishop, Archbishop Theophan was a member of the Local Council of the All-Russian Orthodox Church in 1917–1918.

Sometimes the Archbishop shared his impressions of the Council. Thus, one incident occurred, a meeting with a group of renovationist clergy and with some liberal-minded professors of theological academies. These modernist liberals decided to “catch” the Archbishop “in words.”


They began with flattery: “We respect, we honor you, Your Eminence, we know your integrity, your steadfastness, your church wisdom.

Local Council of the Russian Orthodox Church 1917–1918


The opponents left Archbishop Feofan at this point.

After the Council, returning to Poltava, Bishop Feofan experienced great troubles in a clash with the Ukrainian independenceists, the Petliurists. Having seized power in Kiev into their own hands, Petliura and his supporters demanded that the Poltava bishop perform a solemn memorial service for the former hetman of Ukraine Ivan Mazepa, the favorite of Tsar Peter, but in the Battle of Poltava he treacherously betrayed the Tsar and went over to the side of his enemies - the Swedes and for this he was devoted to the Russian Orthodox Church. Anathema to the Church.

End of introductory fragment.

According to 1861 data, 109 priests, 58 deacons and 205 clergymen (lower church servants - sextons and psalm-readers) served in the district. In 1911, there were 123 priests, 63 deacons, and 97 psalmists. All priests had completed or incomplete seminary education. The level of education among deacons and psalm-readers was significantly lower. The financial situation of the rural clergy directly depended on the state of the parish and parishioners, and they, for the most part, were poor. Therefore, the clergy ran their own subsidiary farming. Beekeeping brought a certain income to the clergy.

The average number of children in clergy families throughout the 19th century was 3-4 people. If in the 19th century sons could choose only one path for themselves - the spiritual, and studied mainly at the expense of their parents, then at the beginning of the 20th century many already entered secular educational institutions and were often supported there at government expense. In the past, daughters of the clergy received only home education, then married (most often to a representative of the clergy) or remained with their parents. By the beginning of the 20th century, most of the daughters of priests and clergymen studied at the diocesan women's school, at the highest women's courses. The education they received gave them the opportunity to work as teachers in primary schools.

Among the main duties of the clergy was exhortation and conversion of Old Believers and sectarians to Orthodoxy. Priest of the village of Kosmodamianskaya Ira I.V. Voskresensky converted 14 people from the Old Believers in 1839, the priest of the village of Peresypkino M.S. Bogoslovsky - 7 Molokans, the priest of the village of Vyazhli I. Krezov joined 9 Old Believers to the Church and converted 27 Molokans to Orthodoxy. We also see examples of successful missionary work later: Archpriest I.E. Rozhdestvensky joined 111 Molokans to Orthodoxy. However, all these cases, apparently, were exceptional and isolated in nature.

In the matter of preaching at the beginning of the 19th century, the clergy had little success. When in 1803 the spiritual authorities proposed to select the best one from among the rural preachers to deliver sermons in Kirsanov, only one priest was found - Fr. Pyotr Antonov from the village of Kipets. Gradually the situation changed. So, in 1806, both priests of the village of Volkovo asked permission to preach to them.

By the end of the century, in 1894, the dean of the Kirsanovsky district already wrote: “The clergy of the district are at the height of their service, divine services are performed in an unforgiving manner, demands are performed correctly, teachings are given every Sunday and holiday; extra-liturgical conversations are held in all churches... the level of morality rises ".

The financial situation of the district clergy continued to be difficult. The landowners went bankrupt, the peasants were forced to rent land in order to somehow make ends meet, their incomes decreased, and therefore, offerings to the temple decreased. In addition to monetary donations, there was another source of income for the church - ruga, that is, an offering in the form of natural products. The Ruga regularly met in the 19th century and was a considerable help in providing for the clergy. At the beginning of the 20th century, it turned into an inconvenient tradition for peasants, especially in poor parishes.

In the years 1836-1839, 3-4 cases are known when clerks ended up in military service. Their place was assigned to wives. Widows and daughters of the clergy could become prosphora bakers (bake prosphora) in the parish. In the 20th century, prosphorni were mainly peasant widows and girls. They received 2-3 kopecks per prosphora. The supernumerary clergy both in the city and in the village remained supported by their sons. In the first half of the 19th century, widows were assigned the place of their husband. At the end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th centuries. Small pensions of up to 25 rubles a year began to be paid from church funds. The pension system was improved. At the end of the 19th century, the so-called emerital cash desks began to open ("emerit" - length of service, merit).

The rural clergy at the turn of the century did not represent a homogeneous, gray and inert mass, as it might often seem to readers of critical articles in the liberal press of that time. Among the representatives of the clergy one could meet people of different types.

So, priest F.A. Kobyakov from the village of Perevoz, who died in 1915 at the age of 37, renovated the temple, rebuilt the school, and contributed to the eradication of Baptism. In 1904-1905 he helped the army. Thanks to him, there were no riots in the parish.

In 1914, he was an accountant and cashier in a savings and loan partnership, which he himself opened. He said about himself: “I spin like a squirrel in a wheel, never knowing peace, which is why I burned.” There were many of these among the younger generation of clergy. They perceived serving God as serving society, and therefore were very active and active.

Priest of the village of Arbenyevka V.I. Raev was an employee of the diocesan guardianship, a deputy of the general diocesan congress, an elector to the State Duma, chairman of the Council of a credit partnership, chairman of the audit commission of a consumer society, and from the beginning of the First World War, chairman of the guardianship of the families of persons mobilized for the war.

Family of the district priest.
Photo from the beginning of the 20th century.

And among the older generation of rural pastors of that time, who were not always distinguished by active social service, there were many bright personalities who left behind a good memory. About priest F.I. They wrote to Belyakov from the village of Rzhaksa († 1915): “He was a pure idealist, a complete family man... he knew how to speak lively, concisely and interestingly, he was modest, a humorist. We never heard a word of condemnation or censure from him.”

In 1884, after a forced twenty-year break, the Orthodox clergy again entered the field of school teaching activities. Church schools became a common concern of the clergy. By 1917, 6,194 people (3,726 boys and 2,468 girls) were studying in 106 parochial schools in Kirsanovsky district. It is worth noting that the majority of priests, deacons and psalm-readers treated the matter of school education and upbringing responsibly. Moreover, they did not receive money for working at school.


Hieromonk Veniamin (Fedchenkov)
in the park of the Boratynsky Mara estate.
Photo from the 1900s.

The history of the creation of parochial schools in the Russian Empire is inextricably linked with the name of Sergei Alexandrovich Rachinsky. Sergei Alexandrovich's mother, Varvara Avramovna (Abramovna), to whom he owes his upbringing and primary education, was the younger sister of the poet Yevgeny Boratynsky and grew up in the Mara estate of the Kirsanov district of the Tambov province. Knowing the culture of the Boratynsky family, one can imagine how the foundations of public education spread from Tambov Mary to Smolensk Tatevo (from a noble estate to peasant villages), and from Tatev throughout Russia. Initiative S.A. Rachinsky is also responsible for the establishment in 1882 of a sobriety “concord” in the village of Tatevo and the spread of similar societies in Russia.

Largely thanks to the efforts of clergy and local landowners at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries. In some villages of the district, a tradition of so-called folk readings arises. The first such readings were organized in Kirsanovsky district in the village of Velmozhino in 1882 in the form of private conversations between the local landowner Goryainov and his wife with peasants. The conversations took place on Sundays in winter, began in October and continued until Easter. The subject of the conversations was: the Old and New Testaments, an explanation of worship, and the lives of the saints. At the same time, with the help of a “magic lantern” (overhead projector), paintings that were ordered from Moscow were shown. The same readings were allowed by the diocesan authorities in 1894 in the village of Sokolovo (under the personal responsibility of the teacher of the Sokolovsky school, priest I. Vinogradov), in 1895 in the village of Perevoz (conducted by priest A. Sovetov, teacher D. Aladinsky and deacon A. Vindryaevsky) and other villages of the district.

Unfortunately, the good intentions of local landowners, if any, did not always resonate with the local clergy. Thus, when the owner of the estate in Bogoslovka, Kirsanovsky district, Vladimir Mikhailovich Andreevsky, was elected church warden by the peasants, he “joyfully seized on this matter, imagining that engaging in church parish farming would be an excellent soil for the development of charitable and educational activities, which were supposed ... to be that connecting a link that could fill the gap that separated the nobility from the peasantry." “However, my hopes,” recalls Andreevsky, “were not destined to be justified: among the rural clergy I encountered such a self-interested, petty, slanderous, coldly selfish attitude towards everything that went beyond the boundaries of their private interests that I was forced to abandon my good intentions. Only once, in 1891, under the influence of the catastrophic situation of the population, due to a complete crop failure, I managed to organize a parish committee, which, under my chairmanship, included: a priest, an elder, a teacher and elected representatives of the peasants. The tasks of the committee included: collecting funds, supplying food to those most in need in our parish, medical care and funerals of the poor... The Committee worked with enthusiasm; money and various products flowed to us abundantly and often from the most unexpected sources. The peasants treated the Committee as something close, their own. I was delighted. But the famine ended, life returned to normal and... Our committee died out."

It is worth noting that there was also this type of rural prayer pastors, whom Metropolitan Veniamin (Fedchenkov) later recalled. The future metropolitan and his friend went to one such priest - Father Vasily - 40 miles from the village of Chutanovka, where he was staying with his parents after studying. Father Vasily S., who had a large family, performed the service according to the full rules, and he himself sang stichera interspersed with the old psalm-reader. He got up early, at three o'clock, began to serve Matins at five, and it took him three or even more hours to perform the proskomedia. At 10 o'clock the gospel for the liturgy was heard, and Father Vasily was still taking out and taking out particles in the altar. By one o'clock in the afternoon the liturgy ended and prayer services began. He returned home by three o'clock. And in the evening again to the temple. And so every day. They brought the sick, those possessed by demons, to Father Vasily. They sent notes of remembrance from different directions. Of course, this path often excluded active participation in all sorts of societies, committees and other socially useful and significant endeavors. But it was precisely this type of shepherding that enjoyed constant love among the common people; people from different parts of the district, and sometimes even the province, were drawn to it. Such shepherds were most needed and sought after.

It often happened that the flock in the village itself was much higher spiritually than its young shepherd, “and then they gradually spiritualized the shepherd with their whole life,” as Archbishop Theodore (Pozdeevsky) testified in his writings, being the rector of the Tambov spiritual church. seminaries.

The beginning of the twentieth century in Russia was a time of surge in political and social activity. The clergy did not remain aloof from this. One of the pastors who did not shy away from publicly discussing the problems of the Church and society in the press was the priest of the village of Morshan-Lyadovka, Konstantin Bogoyavlensky. Articles about. Constantine are not uncommon in the Tambov diocesan bulletins. He wrote about the purpose of his work: “I believe that if out of a dozen articles I have written, at least one good thought falls into the heart of the reader, then this is already a great thing...”. Father Konstantin took a very definite political position: “There must be covenants: Orthodoxy, nationality, the unity of Rus'.” Unity became his main theme. He also calls on the clergy to do this, suggesting: “Let us create a fund of “fraternal leaflets” to fight anarchy and disorder.” In addition to journalistic articles, Fr. Konstantin Bogoyavlensky also wrote fiction. In 1906, his long story “The Terrible Sitting” was published in several issues of Vedomosti.

The influence of the priest of Epiphany on the peasants of his village was so great that during the unrest of 1905 in the parish of Fr. There were no speeches for Constantine, and even agitators who came to the village were kicked out by the parishioners. At the request of the governor, the diocesan authorities awarded priest Konstantin Bogoyavlensky with an award for his activities during this troubled period.

The lower members of the clergy also became more active. Often psalm-readers and deacons were engaged in missionary work and were teachers. In the obituary of the deacon of the village of Staraya Gavrilovka, who died in 1905, A.V. Alekseev said: “He was an ideal minister. For 22 years he was a teacher at a local parochial school and for 10 years a trustee, and he devoted himself entirely to this work.”

The Kirsanov clergy showed particular activity during the war of 1914-1918. A branch of the diocesan committee for assistance to refugees was opened in the city, at a meeting of which they decided on a 2% monetary collection from each church. Named beds were created at the local branch of the Red Cross and in the infirmary. In each parish, guardianship was created for the families of persons taken to war. Their main goal is to collect funds, things to send to the front and help the families of soldiers.

Active parish activity during the war united the clergy and parishioners. The participation of parishioners in providing assistance to the army was also carried out through parochial schools. School students made things and collected money. In addition, fallen soldiers were remembered at morning prayers in schools, Sunday prayers were served, and religious processions were held.

The monasteries of Kirsanovsky district made a significant contribution to collecting donations and providing assistance to those in need. The Alexander Nevsky Monastery opened an infirmary with 10 beds, the Tikhvin-Bogorodichny Convent gave up the top floor of one of the monastery buildings to the Red Cross, and the Orzhevsky Bogolyubov Convent opened a shelter for the children of fallen soldiers.

Among the local Orthodox shrines of the district, holy springs occupied a special place. The hope of receiving healing of soul and body brought many pilgrims to the springs, who shared what they saw and heard with pious interlocutors in their native places. The sources were both ancient and recent. So, not far from the village of Kletinshchina there was a spring of St. Nicholas the Wonderworker. Local legend tells about its origin as follows: “Once upon a time there lived a brother and sister, who were considered “stupid.” The brother was a shepherd. One day, when he was tending a flock and lay down to rest on the grass, an old man appeared to him in a dream and said: “Go to village and tell the old men to dig in this place." Waking up, the boy thought: “What you won’t see in a dream.” However, the next day, when he again lay down to rest in the same place, the old man appeared to him again in a dream and for the second time commanded the same thing. Now the brother realized that it was not without reason that he was having these dreams, and told everything to his mother. But the mother did not listen to her son. Another time he did not go to bed and saw that the old man who had appeared in the dream was coming towards him. Closer, the old man drew a square on the ground with a stick that needed to be dug in. Only now the boy went and told everything to the old men.

God-fearing old men came to that place, dug with a shovel and saw a stone, and under it, on the edge, was an icon of St. Nicholas the Wonderworker. This was the old man who appeared to the simple shepherdess. Nothing is known about the fate of the icon, but a spring began to flow at the place where it was found.


After some time, the boy’s sister saw St. Nicholas in a dream, commanding: “Tell the old people to build a chapel in this place.” She told about the dream, and the village old people put together a log house, but they were in no hurry to move it to the source. Then the brother again sees the old man in a dream, who tells him to hurry up and move the log house today. And so they did. And when the frame was erected, a fire broke out in the place where it had previously stood, and part of the village burned down. People were drawn to the source and, by their faith, began to receive healing.”

The Karandeevskaya miraculous icon of the Mother of God “Joy of All Who Sorrow” enjoyed great fame in the district. The landowner Pavlov, who received the village of Karandeevka into his possession, wanted to build a temple here, but there was no money for construction. His wife began to pray at the icon of the Mother of God “Joy of All Who Sorrow,” and in a dream the village elder appeared to her and handed her a paper with the inscription: “Build, build a church for me, I will not leave you all my life.” And the signature "Mother of God". After this dream, the Pavlovs had a large harvest of buckwheat, from the sale of which they earned several thousand rubles. With this money, a temple was built in Karandeevka in 1865. An icon was also placed there.


Vyazlya River.
Photo from the beginning of the 20th century.

Many miraculous incidents were associated with this icon. Here are some of them published in the Tambov Diocesan Gazette magazine. The parish priest's wife was blind. Once, during the all-night vigil, she prayed at the Karandeevskaya icon for healing. After the anointing I received my sight. Since then, a special day for celebrating the icon has been established in Karandeevka - the 1st Friday after Trinity.

Andrei Petrovich Bezpolov, a peasant in the Saratov province of the Balashov district of the village of Koleno, did not walk for three years. Nobody could help him. In 1872 they brought him to Karandeevka. After prayer and anointing, he recovered.

A peasant woman from the village of Muchkap, Lukeria Feofanova, was tormented by severe headaches. In 1875 she went to Karandeevka. After a prayer service and sprinkling with holy water, she received relief, and after swimming in the Vorona River, she felt completely healthy. For three years, every year she came to the holiday, but did not go to the fourth, and the severe headaches returned. Healing came after the pilgrimage resumed.

Noblewoman of the village of Grushevka A.A. Muratova was deaf for 10 years. On the advice of her friend Kiriakova, she went to Karandeevka. Participated in all celebrations. After her ears were anointed, she recovered.

Kirsanovsky merchant Ivan Nikolaevich Kryuchenkov was threatened with death as a result of gangrene of his right hand. Doctors advised amputation. Kryuchenkov did not agree and decided to die without amputation. He led a drunken lifestyle, but was religious and did not miss a single holiday service.

And so, one day, in dying anguish, I went out onto the porch of the house and saw people going to Karandeevka. Ivan decided to go with them. He defended the liturgy, a prayer service, participated in a religious procession, bathed in the Vorona River, and when he took off the bandages, he discovered that his hand was completely healthy. This happened in 1880.

Our region contains many other unknown or, simply speaking, evidence of God’s help to people that has not reached us. This chapter describes only a small part of them.

Notes

82. There were exceptions. An example of this is the noble family of Orzhevsky, who came from a clergy and received their surname from the village of Orzhevka, Kirsanovsky district. Son of a priest Orzhevka Vasily Vladimirovich Orzhevsky (1797-1868) served as director of the executive police department; had the rank of Privy Councilor. One of his sons, Pyotr Vasilyevich (1839-1897), was appointed head of the Warsaw gendarme district in 1873. From 1882 to 1887 Pyotr Vasilyevich - comrade of the Minister of Internal Affairs and commander of the Separate Corps of Gendarmes; senator. From 1893 until the end of his life, Governor-General of Vilna, Kovno and Grodno; General of the Cavalry (1896). Peter Vasilyevich's wife Natalya Ivanovna (nee Princess Shakhovskaya) was a trustee of the Zhitomir community of nurses of the Red Cross, and was part of the delegation that examined the situation of Russian prisoners of war in Germany and Austria during the First World War. Another son of Vasily Vladimirovich, Vladimir Vasilyevich (born in 1838), commanded a brigade in the 22nd Infantry Division. His son, Alexey Vladimirovich (d. 1915), served as a cornet in the Cavalry Guard Regiment of Empress Maria Feodorovna. During the First World War he served in the Life Guards Preobrazhensky Regiment.
83. Klimkova M. “Fatherly land...”. History of the Boratynsky estate. P. 351.
84. GATO. F. 181. Op. 1. D. 404. L. 177.
85. Ibid. D. 411. L. 2.
86. Ibid. D. 1835. L. 48-50.
87. TEV, 1915. No. 4. P. 315-316.
88. GATO. F. 181. Op. 1. D. 2272. L. 9.
89. TEV, 1915. No. 18. P. 636-638.
90. For more details, see the book: Klimkova M.A. "Fatherly land..." History of the Boratynsky estate. St. Petersburg, 2006.
91. See: Klimkova M. “Attentive rural teacher...”. Sergei Aleksandrovich Rachinsky and the foundations of his public schools // Tambov Diocesan News, 2008. No. 8. P. 21-25; 2009. No. 6.
92. From the report of the society on the organization of public readings. Tambov, 1896.
93. Andreevsky V.M. "About my agriculture." Autobiographical memories (GATO. F. R-5328. Op. 1. D. 8).
94. See: Metropolitan. Veniamin (Fedchenkov). God's people. My spiritual meetings. M., 2011.
95. See: Service to God and Russia. New Hieromartyr Archbishop Theodore. Articles and speeches 1904-1907. Comp. Allenov A.N., Prosvetov R.Yu., Levin O.Yu. M., 2002. P. 117.
96. TEV, 1905. No. 46. S. 1961-1967.
97. Ibid. No. 44. pp. 1824-1832.
98. Ibid. No. 14. pp. 724-727.
99. Ibid. 1905. No. 10. P. 430-433.
100. Ibid. 1916. No. 5. P. 125-136.

© Levin O.Yu., Prosvetov R.Yu.
Kirsanov is Orthodox.