Elena Stepanenko's lawyer accused Yevgeny Petrosyan of bullying the artist. Billion scam
The process took place behind closed doors. During the meeting, the lawyer of the 65-year-old artist Elena Zabralova once again emphasized that Elena Grigorievna is not claiming 80% of the total property, as mentioned earlier, but half. Zabralova also stated that Stepanenko refuses to separate the divorce case into separate proceedings. According to Petrosyan’s lawyer Sergei Zhorin, this is due to the fact that the comedian’s still legal wife “is afraid that her husband, as soon as he gets divorced, will quickly formalize a new relationship.”
After the court hearing, Elena Zabralova spoke with reporters for the first time and revealed some details of the high-profile case. Thus, lawyer Stepanenko stated that Petrosyan has been discrediting his still legal wife throughout the entire divorce process. According to Zabralova, Elena Grigorievna perceives this as bullying.
« For a long period, Elena Grigorievna was completely discredited with the help of the media, as well as with the participation of one of the representatives, Evgeniy Vaganovich. Elena Grigorievna is very sorry that something like this is happening, she thinks it’s just bullying“- said the human rights activist.
Elena Zabralova noted that her client behaves very dignified in this situation. “He maintains his image and doesn’t say a single bad word,” lawyer Elena Stepanenko is quoted as saying by Life.
Let us remind you that information about the divorce of one of the brightest couples in domestic show business appeared at the end of July. At first, the 72-year-old comedian denied rumors of family discord. However, later the news of the separation of the spouses after 32 years of marriage was confirmed by colleagues, and then by Petrosyan and Stepanenko themselves. The divorce was initiated by the 65-year-old artist. Literally it immediately became known that the cause of the breakup was betrayal on the part of Evgeniy Vaganovich. It turned out that Petrosyan and Stepanenko had not lived together for 15 years, and the comedian had long been happy in his relationship with his 29-year-old assistant Tatyana Brukhunova.
Evgeny Petrosyan and Tatyana Brukhunova
Evgeny Petrosyan and Elena Stepanenko
About the condition of the artist, who is going through divorce proceedings with comedian Yevgeny Petrosyan.
A colleague of comedians also expressed concern about the emotional state of the artist. For example, she noted that Stepanenko had recently lost a lot of weight - “probably from nerves.” “I know that they haven’t performed together for a year. What they are talking about now did not happen yesterday. I recently talked with Elena Grigorievna, we spent the evening in a group of women. Young people came up to us, they simply didn’t recognize us as artists, it was nice. It seemed to me that she was very impressed by such attention,” she said. — Elena Grigorievna has lost a lot of weight. And I kept thinking, why? Now it is clear. Maybe really nervous. Because when people get divorced, separate, or divide property, it is always a powerful stress. You wouldn’t wish this on anyone.”
Stepanenko herself, discussing the current situation, called divorce “an everyday matter.”
“Something happens to every person in life. So Evgeniy Vaganovich and I got a divorce. This is an everyday matter. Everything will be according to the court - as the court says, so it will be. And you will learn all about it,” the 65-year-old artist emphasized in an interview with the Vesti program.
According to lawyer Elena Stepanenko, now representatives are deliberately disseminating information that does not correspond to reality that the artist is claiming 80% of the property declared for division.
In turn, Yevgeny Petrosyan’s representative in court said that he was surprised to hear about Stepanenko’s desire to receive less than half of the jointly acquired property as a result of the divorce.
“I was surprised by something else - their side said that Stepanenko wants even less than 50 percent of the property. This is, of course, a twist. I hope that they will also document this desire and attach it to the case materials. Then the dispute will be over at the very first meeting. Even if it’s not less than 50 percent, namely half - if everything is really so, there are no more questions. But it still seems to me that this was said for the sake of words, since earlier she spoke about some 57 percent, now it’s a different number... There is no consistency,” he said.
Elena Zabralova also did not ignore the issue of the comedian’s personal life. She pointed out that there is no doubt that Petrosyan has a young mistress, even though his lawyer denies it.
“Today you won’t surprise anyone with the appearance of young assistants in life who become owners of hearts, lives and, of course, other people’s property. And I understand Yevgeny Vaganovich that it’s unlikely that anyone would want to talk about their affair with their employee half a century apart,” says Zabralova.
Now, Zabralova claims, there can be no talk of a settlement agreement, since in this case Stepanenko could lose his legal half of the property. In turn, Yevgeny Petrosyan insisted only on his own terms.
According to the lawyer, Petrosyan is offering her client the “unnecessary” half.
“My trustee asked for less than half of the identified property, but one apartment takes up half the cost and covers the cost of the rest of the property. It was created as a museum for Petrosyan, there is a stage there. Now he doesn't need her, and he wants to give her away. Why does she need someone else’s museum, how much money should she use to support it,” Zabralova explained.
However, Petrosyan’s representative, commenting on the situation with the “house-museum,” did not agree with Zabralova’s words.
“Stepanenko herself called this property a house-museum, while Zabralova says that it is impossible to live there, that this is not an apartment... But for some reason she forgets that Stepanenko lived there and actually lives there now. It is this apartment that she does not allow Petrosyan into; it is in this apartment that all the things they have acquired together are kept. That is, Zabralova contradicts what they themselves wrote in the statement of claim. If Stepanenko doesn’t need this apartment, let her move out of there,” Zhorin emphasized.
Let us remind you that yesterday, following a meeting, the Khamovnichesky Court of Moscow refused to separate the divorce proceedings of comedians into a separate proceeding. As for copyrights for works, they are not yet divided. The court also temporarily seized the disputed property.
Vladimir Putin, during the “Direct Line” on the first TV channel, answering questions from Russians, made a public statement that Nemtsov, Ryzhkov and Milov, together with Berezovsky, stole billions of rubles from the country’s budget in the 90s, and now, having spent money, they want to return to power again and fill their pockets. The plaintiffs went to court demanding a refutation of this statement and compensation of 1 million rubles. After the completion of the trial, which took place on February 14, judge Tatyana Adamova announced only the operative part of the decision: to refuse the claim for the protection of honor and dignity. The full version of the court's decision will appear in a few days, which will set out the reasons for the refusal.
The case of Academician Kudryavtsev
Attention
As Rosbalt has already reported, in 2010, the famous heart surgeon Yuri Shevchenko purchased an apartment in the House on the Embankment for his daughter Ksenia. During the renovation, it turned out that the five-room apartment on the floor above belongs to Vladimir Gundyaev (the secular name of Patriarch Kirill). A certain Lydia Leonova, who is registered in the same apartment as the patriarch, filed a lawsuit against Shevchenko demanding to pay her 19.7 million rubles.
This amount was estimated for the damage caused by dust and nanoparticles that allegedly entered Kirill’s home during repairs. The claim included the following items: transportation of items from Gundyaev’s apartment and back - 376 thousand rubles, renovation of the apartment - 7.3 million rubles, rental of similar living space during the renovation - 2.1 million rubles, damaged furniture and interior items - 2, 6 million rubles, special cleaning of 970 books - 6.3 million rubles, cleaning of property - 151 thousand rubles.
Zabralova Elena Yurievna
Yuri Shevchenko to pay 19.7 million rubles, he made two transactions to alienate the property belonging to him: it was a formal transfer of apartments No. 212 and No. 374 to his closest relatives - children,” Zabralova said. In total, at the time of the court decision, according to the lawyer, the Shevchenko family owned three apartments in the House on the Embankment, as well as living space in the Arbat area and in St. Petersburg. According to the plaintiffs, all apartments, except two - in the historical building of the Central Executive Committee and Council of People's Commissars of the USSR, were sold.
The former minister gave the daughter of Ksenia Korsun a five-room apartment No. 212 in building 2 on Serafimovicha Street. “We believe that this was a formal transfer: the daughter never registered in this apartment, and also did not bear the costs of paying utility bills. In addition, she has personal living space on Udaltsova Street, at house 32, and on Novokurkinskoye Highway, at house 35,” the lawyer said.
The court refused to recognize Putin as a slanderer
Access to Leonova’s apartment is impossible, therefore, we know what was really damaged there only from her words and the appraiser hired by the plaintiff.” In addition, according to her, not all books were submitted for examination, but only eight, but on the basis of which the cleaning of all books was assessed: “The books were not only covered with dust, but there was fungus on them. So they cleaned not only from dust.” In addition, according to Shevchenko’s defense, Leonova did not rent another home during the renovation, which means she did not incur additional expenses.
Leaving the court, Vera Travkina noted that she still did not understand why the damage was being compensated by Leonova, while in the case materials the owner of the apartment was listed as Vladimir Gundyaev (the secular name of the head of the Russian Orthodox Church). Regarding the speech of her colleague, who described Shevchenko’s property in detail, she only stated that “neighbors do not have the right to interfere in the personal lives of other neighbors,” as well as to count their real estate.
Navalny lost the “browder effect” lawsuit against Kiselyov and VGTRK
Asking a lawyer is faster than searching! Answer in 5 minutes 17 lawyers ready to answer now. Answer in 5 minutes, free of charge! Order a call from a lawyer A lawyer will call you back for free and advise Top Lawyers [how to get here?] Fedotov Mikhail Aleksandrovich Belikova Marina Sergeevna Barshchevsky Mikhail Yurievich Dobrovinsky Alexander Andreevich Lebedev Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Popular materials » How to find a lawyer and not lose money? » How to return goods to the store.. Without a receipt! » Salaries of judges in the Russian Federation and abroad. » Online check and payment of traffic police fines The page is recommended: Basic data: Registration number: 77/1409 Certificate number: Region: Moscow Experience: Experience from: No information Specialization: No information Experience in courts: No information Awards: No information Title: No information Contacts: Membership in the chamber: Advocate ward of the city
Elena Zabirova: plaintiffs use the court as a platform
St. Petersburg and paid the required amount. Neither the plaintiff nor the defendant appeared in court on Friday. In cramped room number 322, lawyers and journalists came to clarify the housing issue. Judge Anna Andriyassova recalled the vicissitudes of the proceedings between two representatives of the Russian Orthodox Church.
The plaintiff’s lawyer, Irina Zabralova, handed over to the court a payment order for the transfer of 19.7 million rubles to the account of the bailiffs, as well as the response of the bailiffs, who confirmed that the funds collected from the defendant had been transferred to their account, and therefore a temporary restriction on Shevchenko’s departure from Russia cancelled. Lawyers for Shevchenko and his daughter were waiting for the lawsuit to be withdrawn. But the plaintiff’s side first decided to explain its position to the court.
Search for "elena" in the yasni system - search for people and information!
MArchI's position in the matter looks even more unattractive. Kudryavtsev implemented a huge social project. The court found that he acted within the law. Within the framework of the law, twelve people on the university’s waiting list received apartments.
And the new management of the university, which for six years has not done anything similar for its employees, is now trying to shift its financial responsibility to its partners onto the shoulders of its former colleague and boss. Elena Yuryevna Zabralova, Lawyer of the Bureau "Zabralova, Krylova and Partners" In addition to the fact that during the period of committing actions that the prosecution considers criminal under Article 286 (excess of authority), Alexander Petrovich Kudryavtsev did not hold the position of rector of the MArchI and did not have the powers that he could somehow exceed, the accusation contains a lot of factual and illiterate errors.
The Zamoskvoretsky court satisfied Leonova’s claim in full, and later the Moscow City Court agreed with this decision. It is noteworthy that in an interview with Vladimir Solovyov, Patriarch Kirill said that he would donate all the money received in the court case about the apartment in the “House on the Embankment” to charity. Mikhail Chernyak **** “The books were not only covered with dust, but there was fungus on them.
So they were cleaning not only from dust.” Lydia Leonova, who is registered in an apartment in the House on the Embankment, where the relatives of Patriarch Kirill live, withdrew her claim to invalidate the agreement of donation of an apartment, written out to her daughter by the former head of the Ministry of Health, Yuri Shevchenko. The plaintiffs received 19.7 million rubles in compensation.
All decisions of civil courts confirm that the vice-rector acted in the interests of MArhI - no one challenged these decisions. The charges under Article 159 (Fraud) appear even more groundless. Contrary to the statements of the investigation A.P. Kudryavtsev did not commit fraudulent actions, did not meet the victims and did not know them.
Important
During the implementation of the Investment Contract, none of the MArchI employees, including him, provided false information to the victims, nor did they hide any information from investors. None of the victims were misled, were not deceived, none of them were given false information, and especially not by Academician Kudryavtsev. Rafael Semenovich Paleev, Lawyer at the Moscow Bar Association In addition to those obvious violations and inconsistencies in the accusation that my colleagues spoke about in the courtroom, I would like to note the defiant lack of professionalism of its author.
Elena Zabirova Wikipedia
Lyubov Aleksandrovna Makarova Representative of the injured party First of all, we do not recognize ourselves as victims. We have no claims against the accused - neither material nor moral. We consider this case to be completely fabricated. It clearly shows an interested party. The new management of MArHI is trying to get rid of obligations to investors by shifting the responsibility of a legal entity to a living, well-deserved and absolutely innocent person. The position of everyone whom the prosecutor’s office is trying to portray as victims in this process absolutely coincides with the position of Academician Kudryavtsev’s lawyers. As a representative of the victims, I declare that we do not admit any theft, do not consider ourselves the injured party, and have no claims against the accused.
Zabralova Elena Yuryevna lawyer biography
The court understood correctly, are you against terminating the lawsuit?” - the judge asked her again. Then the lawyer finally agreed to withdraw the claim. The judge retired to the deliberation room, and half an hour later announced that the court had terminated proceedings on Lydia Leonova’s claim against Yuri Shevchenko and the seizure of apartment No. 212 had been lifted. After the hearing in the corridors of the court, Travkina said that during the hearing, in her opinion, the equality of the parties was violated.
“We can put an end to the case about Shevchenko’s apartment. But we filed complaints against the decision of the Zamoskvoretsky court and hope to challenge the amount of compensation. I think the Moscow City Court will answer in the near future. If the complaint is rejected, we will appeal to the Supreme Court,” the lawyer told Gazeta.Ru. “We asked the court to conduct an independent assessment of the damage, but the court did not respond.
Comedians Elena Stepanenko and Evgeny Petrosyan are getting divorced and dividing their 1.5 billion fortune in court. The plaintiffs themselves are not present at the closed sessions; they are represented by lawyers Sergei Zhorin and Elena Zabralova, who once defended Putin himself.
Petrosyan and Stepanenko themselves do not comment on the divorce, and they forbid their friends. " Something happens to every person in life. So Evgeniy Vaganovich and I got a divorce,” Stepanenko gave the only comment to journalists. – Well, this is an everyday matter, well, well, it happened. Everything will be according to the court. As the court says, so it will be».
The fact that the couple has not lived together for a long time is no secret to their colleagues.
« I don’t remember how many years ago, but everyone knows that Elena Grigorievna and Evgeniy Vaganovich fled long ago,– shared one of the actors of the TV show “Distorted Mirror”. – But they have a joint business, they had to hide their squabbles. And this is understandable! It used to be that when they came on tour to a city, they always booked separate hotel rooms for themselves. And behind the scenes they preferred to communicate to a minimum. There could have been a fight at rehearsals. I don’t know what kind of cat once ran between them. Treason?! I didn’t notice their love affairs on the side. Although lately I have increasingly begun to notice the girl Tatyana next to Petrosyan, she works in his theater. But I don’t know what’s between them. Evgeny Vaganovich provides us with work, television, we do our job, and that’s it. We try not to interfere in his personal life».
Indeed, rumors have recently appeared that Petrosyan has a new affair with a certain 29-year-old Tatyana Brukhunova. The girl came to conquer the capital from Tula. I started with the Internet. More precisely, from the website of the fan club of singer Abraham Russo. Later she appeared at the Petrosyan Theater of Variety Miniatures, where she rose to the position of head of the group. However, all the characters in the drama deny the fact of betrayal.
If Evgeny Petrosyan hired lawyer Sergei Zhorin, who became famous for defending pop and film stars, then Elena Stepanenko relied on Elena Zabralova.
Her name is hardly familiar to the general public. Zabralova does not appear on TV or give comments in the press. But in court she defended Vladimir Putin himself. In 2011, opposition politicians Boris Nemtsov, Vladimir Ryzhkov and Vladimir Milov filed a lawsuit against Vladimir Putin and a couple of television companies for the protection of honor and dignity. The President then said on air that all sorts of Milovs, Nemtsovs and Ryzhkovs stole billions in the 1990s. In court, Putin's interests were represented by Zabralova.
« I remember that meeting“, Boris Nemtsov’s lawyer Vadim Prokhorov tells the Sobesednik journalist. – You know, the impression was created that Judge Adamova, and not Elena Zabralova, acted as the president’s lawyer. During the hearing, the judge herself searched on the Internet for some facts about the “corruption” of Nemtsov, Ryzhkov and Milov. I didn’t find any evidence, but the court still came to the president’s defense. I remember Boris Efimovich being surprised: what was the work of lawyer Zabralova?!»
Six months after that trial, Elena Zabralova acted as a defender of Patriarch Kirill in the framework of the famous “dusty case.” Then, more than 19 million rubles were recovered from the Patriarch’s neighbor in the House on the Embankment, surgeon Yuri Shevchenko, in favor of the bishop of the Russian Orthodox Church. Later, Zabralova defended the interests of the head of Rosneft, Igor Sechin, and the Deputy Mayor of Moscow, Vladimir Resin, in the courts. And she always won the cases.
It’s clear that such “star” lawyers don’t come from the street. Who helped? They say that Elena Zabralova is on friendly terms with the Chairman of the Moscow City Court, Olga Egorova. They say she introduced her friend to influential people. Knowing about Elena Stepanenko’s piety and Yevgeny Petrosyan’s good relationship with the President of Russia (the artist was even his confidant), we can assume that the spouses’ battle for property will be difficult. This means we will be watching another melodrama.
According to lawyers, it is known that the Stepanenko-Petrosyan spouses, in addition to a solid baggage of jokes and a collection of antiques, acquired 10 apartments in their legal marriage, not counting country real estate.
Until now, it was believed that only the dacha in Lyubertsy was registered in Stepanenko’s name, while the mansion with outbuildings in Zhavoronki and apartments in the capital, according to documents, are the property of Yevgeny Petrosyan. But that's not true.
For example, the same Stepanenko owns a small one-room apartment in Bolshoi Kondratievsky. Of the three apartments in the so-called House of Humor on Sechenovsky Lane, two are jointly owned by them, and Petrosyan officially donated his share in the third to his wife back in February 2016. That is, comedians sorted out property relations without any jokes even then.
And Elena Stepanenko lives in the largest apartment of the ten - 516 square meters. meters. This property, legally registered in the name of Evgeny Petrosyan, is located on the 6th floor of the elite residential complex “Novaya Ostozhenka” and costs about 650 million rubles.
For the third week now, the “scandal in a noble family” has been discussed, but neither “Live Broadcast” nor “Let Them Talk” - the two main talk shows that usually immediately respond to hot sensations - have not devoted a single episode to Petrosyan and Stepanenko.
As the producers of the scandalous TV shows told Sobesednik, the hunt is now open for Petrosyan and Stepanenko. But the journalists don’t even have time to name the amount they are willing to pay for them to throw mud at each other in the studio, when they immediately receive a categorical refusal.
At the very beginning of the litigation, the comedians asked the court to classify the divorce proceedings from the media. It seems that they are hoping to cut down the apartments without washing the dirty linen in the elite huts they have acquired together. “It’s really funny: chasing handouts from Malakhov with Petrosyan’s billions. It’s difficult to compete with their condition,” admit the talk show staff.