Who invented Vishnevsky ointment? Effective treatment of hemorrhoids with Vishnevsky ointment

Surgery Center named after. A. V. Vishnevsky - one of the first scientific research medical centers and multidisciplinary surgical institutions in the Russian Healthcare system.

History of the Surgery Center named after. A.V. Vishnevsky is unusual. It began in the 19th century and since then, despite all the vicissitudes of fate, this small corner of the capital has not lost its originality and has retained the purpose assigned to it by our ancestors - to help people in trouble, to be a source of goodness, mercy, selflessness and advanced medical thought .

Since the last quarter of the 19th century. On the site where the Institute is now located, charitable and hospital institutions were built, which amounted to the beginning of the twentieth century. a unique “hospital town”.

The starting point of the history of the “town” should be considered 1862, when Emperor Alexander II imposed a positive resolution on the request of the merchants of the 1st guild of the Solodovnikov brothers to build an almshouse on Shchipok Street at their own expense.

The three Solodovnikov brothers, large merchants of textiles, gave their own land (about 1.85 hectares) with a linden garden located there for construction. They also donated huge funds for those times (500,000 rubles) for the construction and maintenance of a building for the poor, sick and elderly. The opening of the almshouse took place on June 1, 1865. After the death of the last of the organizing brothers in 1875, S.V. became the trustee of the almshouse and remained so for many years. Alekseev - father of K.S. Stanislavsky

The almshouse on Shchipka marked the beginning of the creation of a whole complex of care and hospital institutions.

A few years later, on January 19, 1873, the Moscow merchant society supported the proposal to build a hospital in honor of the recovery (after a serious illness) of the heir to the throne, Alexander Alexandrovich. They decided to raise funds for the construction of the hospital by subscription.

The hospital was supposed to accommodate 50 people - men and women, without distinction of rank or condition. In honor of Emperor Alexander II, the institution was named the Alexander Hospital of the Moscow Merchant Society.

On January 26, 1873, the Emperor conveyed gratitude to the Society and official permission to establish a hospital in his name.

After a long search for a place for construction, the Society acquired for this purpose land holdings adjacent to the Solodovnikovskaya almshouse, which also belonged to the Solodovnikovs.

Construction was carried out according to a unique project for that time, taking into account both domestic and foreign experience and the latest sanitary and hygienic requirements at that time.

In 1893, the Moscow Merchant Society received a donation from the merchant of the 1st guild, Tatyana Guryevna Guryeva, in the amount of 325,000 rubles for the establishment and maintenance of the House of Charity for the Poor.

By that time, the problem of choosing a place for construction no longer arose. It was planned to erect a new building in such a way that it would form a single ensemble with the Alexander Hospital and the Solodovnikovskaya Almshouse.

The land for the expanding complex was purchased by the Moscow Merchant Society in advance from various owners.

It was assumed that 70 elderly, 20 terminally ill and 10 blind women – all without distinction of rank – would receive care in the nursing home.

Like previous buildings, it was three-story. The eastern part of the building was occupied by a temple: in the first tier - the Church of St. Martyr Tatiana, in the second - the Intercession of the Most Holy Theotokos.

House of Charity for the Poor named after T.G. Guryeva opened in January 1896. During the construction period from T.G. Guryeva continued to receive additional donations. She also purchased neighboring lands, stipulating in her will the possibility of their future use for development.

After eleven years, the Moscow Merchant Society allocated 50,000 rubles for the construction of an extension to the T.G. almshouse. Guryeva.

In January 1908, construction was completed, the extension was connected to the existing building into a single whole, increasing its capacity by another 50 people.

In subsequent years, new donations came to the Guryev almshouse, personal scholarships were established, but it was maintained at the expense of the founder, T.G. Guryeva.

Since the Moscow Merchant Society was the trustee of the Solodovnikovskaya almshouse, the Guryev House of Charity and the Aleksandrovskaya Hospital, the complex of these institutions was considered as a single whole. All decisions related to the maintenance, maintenance and development of buildings were now made based on the generality of their purpose.

Another building, now owned by the Institute of Surgery. A.V. Vishnevsky, is the building of a former almshouse, built at the beginning of the twentieth century. with donations from Pavel Mikhailovich Tretyakov. The total amount of donations amounted to 993,758 rubles. Land for the construction of an almshouse for 380 people was purchased on Bolshaya Serpukhovskaya Street, so that the new institution would join the existing “hospital town” complex.

The building was built in the neo-Russian style using stylized decorative elements of ancient Russian buildings. During the construction of the building, the latest achievements were taken into account, both in construction and in sanitation and hygiene. The heating of the building is done in such a way that at a temperature outside of minus 30 degrees, it is possible to create plus 20 degrees inside the room. Double ventilation was provided - by supplying heated and humidified air and an exhaust system. The floors in the chambers and dining room were oak parquet. Electric lighting was installed in the almshouse - a rare innovation at that time. The Moscow merchant society approved this innovation and decided to install electric lighting in all buildings of the “hospital town.”

The fame of the comfort and convenience of the Tretyakov almshouse spread throughout Moscow even before construction was completed. Its grand opening took place on November 19, 1906.

Until 1917, the complex of four main buildings and a number of auxiliary buildings, built with funds from benefactors, was under the care of the Moscow Merchant Society.

After the October Revolution of 1917, the almshouses were gradually converted into a hospital, which received the name of the first People's Commissar of Health N.A. Semashko. It was one of the largest and fairly well-equipped hospitals, which included two surgical, orthopedic, therapeutic and neurological departments, maternity hospital, outpatient clinic, anatomical theater, x-ray room and pharmacy. The reception department worked around the clock. The hospital was designed for inpatient treatment of 425 patients. The hospital operated successfully for 15 years.

On August 11, 1936, by resolution of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR N 1462, it was transferred to the All-Union Institute of Experimental and Clinical Medicine named after A. M. Gorky (VIEM).

On the basis of the Solodovnikovskaya and Tretyakov almshouses, the Alexander Hospital and the Guryevsky Home for the Poor, a single complex of experimental and clinical medicine arose. Here they provided a variety of medical care to patients. In addition, the complex had a new, extremely important task - it was to become the largest scientific institution.

It included four independent clinics, but working in close contact:

• Surgical under the guidance of Professor A.V. Vishnevsky (in the building of the almshouse named after P.M. Tretyakov);
• Therapeutic under the guidance of Professor M.P. Konchalovsky (in the building of the House of Charity for the Poor named after T.G. Guryeva);
• Neurological under the leadership of Corresponding Member of the USSR Academy of Sciences M.B. Krol (in the building of the Alexander Hospital);
• Gynecological under the guidance of Professor M.S. Malinovsky (in the building of the Solodovnikovskaya almshouse).

From 1936 to 1941, i.e. only five years, the listed clinics worked as the leading scientific institutions of VIEM. However, their contribution to the development of medicine can hardly be overestimated. The most daring ideas were born and embodied here, earning domestic medicine world fame. And even the war, having made forced changes in the nature of scientific research, could not completely stop their scientific activity.

Since July 1941, evacuation hospital No. 5002 was opened in buildings on Serpukhovskaya Street. Thousands of military personnel with a wide variety of wounds were treated here.

On June 30, 1944, by a resolution of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR, the initiative of medical scientists to create an Academy of Medical Sciences in the country was supported. At the same time, the first ten clinical institutes were organized within the Academy. Among them is the Institute of Experimental and Clinical Surgery.

After the end of the Great Patriotic War Surgeons began returning to the Institute from the front. It is difficult to list all the talented surgeons who, having gone through the crucible of war, graced not only the Institute, but also the entire medicine of the country. This is Academician of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences D.S. Sarkisov, members of the correspondent. Academy of Medical Sciences of the USSR N.I. Krakovsky, P.N. Mazaev, as well as Professor D.F. Blagovidov, G.D. Vilyavin, M.M. Voropaev, N.K. Galankin, T.M. Darbinyan, V.P. Demikhov, S.P. Protopopov, V.I. Pshenichnikov, V.K. Sologub, A.S. Harnas, L.L. Shik, M.I. Schreiber, V.V. Yudenich.

For a short time, academicians of the USSR Academy of Medical Sciences M.N. worked as directors of the Institute. Akhutin, S.S. Yudin and B.V. Petrovsky.

In 1947, a full member of the USSR Academy of Medical Sciences, Professor Alexander Vasilyevich Vishnevsky, was approved as director. The name of Alexander Vasilyevich rightfully stands among the remarkable scientists who have made a huge contribution to the development of domestic surgery. He went down in the history of Russian surgery as a major clinician, an outstanding surgeon, and the creator of an innovative scientific school.

Outstanding scientific achievements of A.V. Vishnevsky was the local anesthesia he proposed using the method of creeping infiltration and the doctrine of nervous trophism in surgery. The Vishnevsky method of anesthesia became one of the leading Soviet surgeons in the operational activities and brought the author wide fame.

Using local anesthesia for many years, especially in inflammatory processes, A.V. Vishnevsky was convinced of the beneficial effect of the novocaine solution on the tissue not only around the inflammatory focus, but even remotely from it. The result of A.V. Vishnevsky’s theoretical generalizations was the use of massive novocaine infiltrates, or novocaine blockades. Clinical experience has shown that novocaine blockades were an effective remedy in complex treatment various kinds pathological processes., inflammation, muscle tone disorders, shock, surgical sepsis.

Based on the idea of ​​mild irritation of the nervous system as a therapeutic factor, he successfully used a special balsamic solution for the treatment of wounds and ulcerative processes. liquid ointment, called “Vishnevsky ointment”. This ointment has truly become a folk remedy for treating wounds.

“Vishnevsky Triad” (methods local anesthesia, novocaine blockades, oil-balsamic dressings) became an era in the development of Soviet surgery, especially military surgery. During the Great Patriotic War, thanks to these methods, the lives of hundreds of thousands of wounded were saved.

After the death of Alexander Vasilyevich in 1948, for his outstanding contribution to the development of domestic surgery, the Institute was named after him.

In 1948, the Institute was headed by the son and successor of Alexander Vasilyevich - Academician of the USSR Academy of Medical Sciences, Hero of Socialist Labor, Colonel General of the Medical Service Alexander Aleksandrovich Vishnevsky, who served as director of the Institute until 1975 and at the same time chief surgeon of the USSR Ministry of Defense until 1978.

Alexander Alexandrovich developed the problems of pain relief in surgery of the heart, lungs and mediastinum, nervous trophism in surgery, and the use of polymers in surgery. In 1953, for the first time in the world, he performed heart surgery under local anesthesia for mitral stenosis. In 1957 he performed the first successful operation in the USSR on open heart using a domestic heart-lung machine.

From 1976 – 1988 The director of the Institute was Mikhail Ilyich Kuzin, an outstanding surgeon, scientist, organizer of medical science and public figure, teacher. Hero of Socialist Labor, laureate of the USSR State Prize, Honored Scientist of the RSFSR, academician of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences.

Under M.I. Kuzin, the Institute not only continued to develop those advanced areas of scientific and practical activity that were laid down by A.A. Vishnevsky, but new ones were also laid, which allowed the Institute to maintain a leading position in Soviet surgery for many years.

Various changes in the directions of scientific research towards their improvement and intensification took place in almost all departments, departments and laboratories, but the most significant affected three: the department of abdominal surgery, wounds and wound infections and the department of thermal trauma.

Developed under the leadership of M.I. Cousin's selective proximal vagotomy gave stable recovery, not a large number of functional disorders. This operation has become widespread both in our country and abroad. During these years, complex operations began to be performed: liver resections, operations on the biliary tract and pancreas, laser and endoscopic papillosphincterotomy, and microsurgical techniques were introduced. Together with the laboratories of intracardiac methods and polymers in medicine, for the first time in the country, therapeutic embolization of bronchial arteries for pulmonary hemorrhage was performed. Together with cardiac surgeons, employees of the laboratory of intracardiac research methods began to carry out intracardiac interventions for stenotic rheumatic heart defects using endovascular access. At this time, a method of examining the cavities of the heart using fiber optics was developed and first introduced into clinical practice.

The Department of Vascular Surgery began to perform operations on the aortic arch and its branches, carotid and vertebral arteries, and brachiocephalic trunk. The priorities of scientific research were the development of methods for diagnosing and treating nonspecific aortoarteritis, as well as studying the possibility of using endovascular occlusion in the treatment of angiodysplasia.

The scientific activities of the wound department have been significantly expanded and deepened, which has become the leading department in the country in the development and implementation of new methods of surgery for extensive and complicated wounds, wound sepsis, and purulent osteomyelitis. In local wound treatment, a transition has been made from traditional fat-based ointment dressings to multicomponent hydrophilic ointments and multicomponent medical powder sorbents based on polyvinyl alcohol, as well as sponge dressings based on collagen and analgesics.

In the mid-1970s, at the burn center of the Institute, a dressing-free method of treating extensive burns was developed and put into practice, which reduced the number of painful dressings and almost halved the time spent in hospital for victims.

To correct post-burn scars and deformities, a department of reconstructive and plastic surgery was created. In a short time, various methods for eliminating deformities were mastered, including balloon tissue stretching and microsurgery. A tissue culture laboratory was created on the basis of the pathomorphology department, in which cultures of the patient’s fibroblasts were grown and studied in order to determine the possibility of using them to prepare for the closure of extensive wounds and burns. The country's first laboratory appeared as part of the X-ray and radiological department computed tomography.

In 1988, the Institute was headed by one of the leaders of domestic surgery of the late 20th - early 21st centuries, Laureate of the State Prize of the USSR and the RSFSR, the Prize of the Government of the Russian Federation, Academician of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Professor Vladimir Dmitrievich Fedorov.

He had the difficult fate of standing at the helm of the Institute during the period of the collapse of the country and the emergence of a new health care structure in the Russian Federation. At this time, new scientific directions, unique diagnostic and treatment methods arose and were developed at the Institute: methods of laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery were developed and put into practice, semiotics and diagnosis of many surgical diseases were developed using computed tomography, angiography and ultrasound research methods. In difficult times for medical science, the Institute did not lose its former glory and continued to develop fundamental research in various areas of surgery.

When treating patients with extensive burns, a method of transplanting cultured fibroblasts was developed and introduced into clinical practice. For the first time in the country, the most complex surgical technologies for liver surgery have been developed: extended hemihepatectomies, central liver resections, multiple segmentectomies, repeated liver resections for tumor recurrences, the latest X-ray surgical interventions and thermal ablation techniques have been introduced malignant neoplasms. Such areas as surgery of the pancreas and non-organ tumors of the retroperitoneal space, and the introduction into clinical practice of simultaneous combined operations for damage to several organs have received great development. Many years of work in this direction have made it possible to make a qualitative breakthrough in surgery, significantly expanding its capabilities, proving the medical and economic feasibility of such interventions.

The Institute developed an original system for using spiral computed tomography data for diagnosing diseases, patented technology for modeling surgical intervention based on computed tomography data, and developed X-ray endovascular diagnostic and treatment methods.

From 2011 to 2016 The head of the Institute was Laureate of the State Prize and the Prize of the Government of the Russian Federation, Academician of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Professor Valery Alekseevich Kubyshkin.

V.A. Kubyshkin Vice-President of the Association of Hepatological Surgeons of Russia and the CIS Countries, Russian Branch of the International Association of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgeons, Deputy Chairman of the Problem Commission on Abdominal Surgery of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Scientific Secretary of the Section of the Commission of the President of the Russian Federation on State Prizes in the Field of Science and Technology, National Representative in the European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons, member of the Board of the Russian Association of Endoscopic Surgeons, editor-in-chief and member of the editorial boards of a number of reputable medical journals - “Surgery”, “Endoscopic Surgery”, “Annals of Surgical Hepatology”. V.A. Kubyshkin is the author of 7 monographs, 6 chapters in national guidelines on surgery and more than 300 scientific articles. Under his leadership, 12 doctoral and 18 candidate dissertations were completed. Valery Alekseevich's services to domestic medicine were awarded the Order of Honor.

In accordance with Order No. 400 of June 21, 2013 of the Ministry of Health of Russia V.A. Kubyshkin was appointed chief freelance specialist in surgery of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.

The main activities of V.A. Kubyshkin are: introduction of laparoscopic technology surgical interventions in Russia for diseases of the liver, pancreas, biliary tract, spleen, diaphragm and gastrointestinal tract; unique works on the pathogenesis of purulent peritonitis and pancreatic necrosis; In the diagnosis and treatment of peritonitis, endoscopic, angiographic and ultrasound methods have been introduced to predict the course of the disease and surgical interventions.

Since January 2016, Director of the Institute of Surgery named after A.V. Vishnevsky is a Laureate of the State Prize of the USSR, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Laureate of the Government Prize of the Russian Federation, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor, Chief Freelance Specialist Surgeon of the Ministry of Health of Russia Amiran Shotaevich Revishvili.

A.Sh. Revishvili published more than 500 scientific works, including: 5 monographs, 5 books, more than 190 major journal articles. President of the All-Russian Scientific Society of Specialists in Clinical Electrophysiology, Arrhythmology and Cardiac Stimulation, member of the expert council of the Higher Attestation Commission, member of the European working group in clinical electrophysiology and cardiac stimulation, editor-in-chief of the Russian edition of the journal “Progress in Biomedical Research”, member of a number of domestic and foreign societies.

The main direction of scientific research of A.Sh. Revishvili – study of clinical electrophysiology of the heart and the formation of arrhythmia mechanisms. He obtained priority data on the electrophysiological and anatomical substrate of supraventricular and non-coronary ventricular arrhythmias, including in children with heart defects and adult patients with coronary heart disease. He was the first to propose an original classification of variants of ventricular preexcitation syndromes and low-traumatic (catheter) methods for eliminating arrhythmias in this pathology. He was the first to describe arrhythmogenic dysplasia of the right atrium, leading to atrial flutter, and developed a method of treating it using cryo- or radiofrequency destruction.

A.Sh. Revishvili is the author of new algorithms for differential diagnosis supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, atrial fibrillation and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. The new methods of diagnosis and electrotherapy of arrhythmias developed by him are implemented in the latest generation of implantable cardioverters - defibrillators, which are today widely used to prevent sudden cardiac death in dozens of countries around the world. His priority in the field of electrophysiological diagnostics and electrotherapy of life-threatening arrhythmias is confirmed by European and American patents. Results of scientific research by A.Sh. Revishvili and his colleagues made it possible to take a new approach to the issues of electrophysiological diagnosis and treatment of tachycardias.

In February 2018, by the decision of the Ministry of Health of Russia, the Institute of Surgery named after. A.V. Vishnevsky received a new status and changed its name: now it is the Federal State Budgetary Institution “National Medical Research Center surgery named after A.V. Vishnevsky" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.

Almost every year pharmaceutical companies offer new remedies that combat the symptoms of hemorrhoidal disease. Despite the presence of specialized medications, Vishnevsky ointment for hemorrhoids continues to remain on the list of popular proctological drugs.

Why does this ointment with a rather unpleasant odor remain in demand for many decades? It's all about its unique natural composition and useful qualities. It is they who allow the drug to compete with specialized products.

The history of the creation of Vishnevsky ointment

The beginning of the last century was marked by a series of military conflicts, which, of course, led to an increase in the number of wounded. In addition, flamethrowers, mass toxic substances, and more powerful explosives were put into operation at this time.

These types of weapons caused complex thermal and chemical damage. Due to infection, many soldiers were doomed, since, despite the skill of the surgeons, there was a banal shortage of antiseptics.

In the 30s of the 20th century, the domestic doctor Alexander Vishnevsky created a unique multicomponent preparation, which was named “Balsamic Liniment according to Vishnevsky.”

Liniment is called the outer medicinal form, which is a thick liquid or mass resembling jelly.

However, people out of habit call the drug Vishnevsky ointment.

The drug was actively used in surgery, its effect was positively assessed by both doctors and patients. But the ointment also had critics who noted that it covered the wounds too tightly and slowed down the healing process.

But, despite some negative aspects, the drug was actively distributed, and received special recognition during the Great Patriotic War, when it saved many human lives.

Composition of the drug

Before talking about the beneficial qualities of the medicine, you should find out what active substances balsamic liniment contains. The drug contains the following ingredients:

• xeroform. It is a chemical substance consisting of bismuth, bromine and phenolic compounds. In its pure form it is a yellow powder with a sharp, recognizable aroma. The ingredient destroys pathogenic microorganisms, dries wounds, accelerates healing and regenerative processes;
• castor oil Natural extract obtained from castor bean fruits by cold pressing. softens the skin, helps other components penetrate deeper into damaged tissues, promotes faster healing of affected areas;
• . This product is obtained by distilling birch bark. Tar contains a large number of different components that have a disinfecting, anti-inflammatory, and wound-healing effect.

The base of the ointment is castor oil, the concentration of other ingredients is 3 grams per 100 grams medicine. The ointment is a not very thick brown substance with a characteristic odor.

Indications for use

To understand in what situations balsamic liniment should be used, you need to refer to the official medical manual.

According to the instructions, the ointment can be used to diagnose the following diseases and pathological conditions:

• bedsores;
• burn injuries;
• frostbite;
• purulent lesion of fatty tissue;
• pustular accumulations;
• furunculosis;
• purulent lesion of bone tissue;
• thrombophlebitis;
• ulcers of the external genitalia in women who have given birth.

It is also acceptable to treat hemorrhoids with Vishnevsky ointment, despite the fact that this drug was not developed specifically to combat this unpleasant disease.

The use of balsamic liniment for varicose veins hemorrhoidal veins are promoted by the ingredients in its composition, whose qualities can improve the patient’s condition.

In addition, Vishnevsky ointment is used after surgical interventions aimed at removing enlarged cavernous formations. The use of the product improves a person’s condition, reduces inflammation and speeds up the healing of wounds.

How does ointment work for hemorrhoids?

The use of Vishnevsky ointment for hemorrhoids contributes to a faster recovery of the patient. This happens due to the unique composition of the drug.

Experts list the following antihemorrhoidal properties of balsamic liniment:

• swelling of the anorectal area decreases;
• the intensity of inflammatory processes decreases;
• accelerates the healing of damaged areas of the skin;
• the severity of pain syndrome decreases;
• pathogenic bacteria and other infectious particles are destroyed;
• the affected areas are cleared of pus;
• regenerative processes are accelerated.

The mechanism of action of the drug is to create an airtight film on the wound surface, which perfectly protects inflamed and damaged tissues from infectious pathogens.

In addition, liniment has warming properties and increases blood flow to the inflamed area. As a result, the inflammatory process intensifies, an infiltrate forms faster, which then breaks out.

Further use of the ointment helps to cleanse and dry the wounds, accelerating the healing and regenerative process. Vishnevsky ointment is more often used for external cavernous formations. However, in some cases it can also be used for internal hemorrhoids.

Contraindications and side effects

The use of Vishnevsky ointment for chronic hemorrhoids also has certain limitations. The drug is primarily prohibited for use if a person is found to be intolerant to any ingredient.

Also, liniment is contraindicated for persons with severe renal failure. In addition, the ointment is prohibited for application to the mucous membranes of the oral and nasal cavities.

In general, when asked whether Vishnevsky ointment can be used to treat hemorrhoids, experts answer positively. Reviews from patients show that the drug extremely rarely causes allergic reactions.

In certain situations (if there is hypersensitivity to the components of the medication), possible side effects such as:

• rash and itching on the skin;
• redness;
• swelling of the skin;
• hives.

If these or other adverse reactions the patient should immediately stop using the product, take an antiallergic drug and consult a doctor to prescribe another medication.

Birch tar in some cases increases the sensitivity of the human body to the rays of the sun. To avoid photosensitivity, it is necessary to spend less time in the open sun during the treatment period.

Thus, despite its cheapness, prevalence and declared safety, it is necessary to use Vishnevsky ointment for the treatment of hemorrhoids only after it has been approved by the attending doctor.

The opinion that this drug will not harm, even if there is no benefit, is erroneous. Improper use of even this safe medication can be fraught with complications or aggravation of the pathological process.

How to properly use Vishnevsky ointment for hemorrhoids?

You should ask a proctologist about how to use liniment for varicose hemorrhoidal veins, since the use of the product has certain features.

It is important for the patient to prepare for treatment procedures. For three days, it is necessary to apply compresses with a light solution of potassium permanganate to the inflamed external cavernous formations.

A gauze bandage should be soaked in manganese liquid and applied to the damaged area. This product helps to further disinfect and prepare the damaged area for subsequent therapy.

Such activities are performed three times a day after bowel movements and washing the anorectal area. In case of severe pain, topical anesthetics, which were prescribed by the proctologist.

The patient should then begin direct liniment therapy. It goes according to the following algorithm:

1. It is necessary to prepare a gauze strip, generously lubricate it with a medicinal substance and apply it to the external hemorrhoidal nodules.
2. The application should be secured to the body with a medical plaster and held for 48 hours, replacing dried compresses with fresh ones every 12 hours.
3. Another option is to apply applications soaked in ointment 3 times a day for 2 hours.

Usually, within a few days, the inflamed cavernous formations subside and swelling decreases. To consolidate the positive result, in the next 2 days before falling asleep, take warm sitz baths with potassium permanganate, and then apply lotions with ointment at night.

Treatment with Vishnevsky ointment is also permissible for the internal form of hemorrhoidal disease (in consultation with the doctor). In this case, the drug is applied to the affected areas using microenemas or a gauze swab, which is inserted into the rectal canal.

To enhance the effect of the ointment, you should additionally take general medications. Thus, venotonics strengthen venous and capillary walls, increase vascular tone, and improve blood circulation in the pelvic organs.

Using ointment during pregnancy

Pregnancy is not among the contraindications to balsamic liniment, so theoretically the ointment can be used for varicose hemorrhoidal veins in expectant mothers.

This disease very often occurs or worsens during pregnancy due to:

• an increase in the amount of progesterone in the body - a hormone that reduces the tone of the uterus, but at the same time reduces intestinal motility. As a result, constipation occurs;
• pressure from a growing child on the peritoneal organs, which leads to prolapse of the lower intestine, impaired blood flow and the development of blood stagnation.

Treatment of expectant mothers is quite difficult, since many medications for hemorrhoids are prohibited during pregnancy. During this period, products that are safe for the child and effective for the mother are allowed. Balsamic liniment fully possesses these qualities.

Application of the drug in many situations allows you to refuse to take systemic analgesics, which are undesirable during pregnancy and the lactation period.

However, despite the fact that the active ingredients of the ointment are not absorbed into the bloodstream and do not have a teratogenic effect, you should not use this medication on your own during the “pregnant” period.

The expectant mother should consult in advance with a doctor who will select necessary drug, including balsamic liniment, will determine the duration of treatment and frequency of use.

Prof. Serov T.P.
Taken from T.P. Serov’s manual.
"Military field medicine for partisans and medical genocide in the USSR", 2006.

Now, so that you understand the whole meaning of military field assistance and the importance of correct treatment of wounds, I will tell you about the sabotage activities of the chief surgeons of the USSR throughout almost the entire Soviet era - the Vishnevsky family, father, son and grandson - a well-known family of typical Soviet crypto-Jews.
His father, the founder of Soviet surgery, Alexander Vasilyevich Vishnevsky, worked in Kazan before Moscow; from 1934, he headed Soviet surgery as the director of Surgery of the Central Institute for Advanced Medical Studies, and then director of the Institute of Surgery named after himself. The years of his life are 1874-1948. Academician of Medical Sciences. The encyclopedia says that he developed methods of local anesthesia with novocaine and introduced into practice an oil-balsamic dressing - Vishnevsky ointment.
It would be more correct to say: bears responsibility. Vishnevsky's ointment specifically concerns wound management. Now, having learned the stages of wound healing, you can see for yourself what the result will be from using Vishnevsky ointment. What are the components of Vishnevsky ointment? Vishnevskaya ointment is very smelly and consists of three parts: birch tar, xeroform and castor oil. Birch tar is black in color; in Rus' it was used to treat cart axles, boots for waterproofing, and horse collars so that they would not crack in the cold.
Xeroform is a chemical with some disinfectant properties. Chemical name xeroform - Bismuth tribromophenolate. Castor oil is an oil with an irritant effect on living tissue, as a result of which it is used mainly as a laxative. All these components of Vishnevsky’s ointment are very cheap.
The main effect of Vishnevsky ointment, due to the presence of tar and castor oil, is warming, preventing the access of oxygen, such as a compress, and, therefore, promoting the occurrence of inflammation and, in particular, anaerobic inflammation. Xeroform has some disinfecting effect, so that it is not obvious that wounds in the USSR are smeared with only tar and a laxative.
Knowing the stages of wound healing, you can imagine that Vishnevsky ointment effectively blocks the access of oxygen to the wound and contributes to the occurrence of anaerobic infection.
And for a wound, I repeat, the most important thing is breathing; fatty ointments block oxygen from wounds, effectively turning off cellular respiration, and therefore should not be used, including Vishnevsky’s tar-laxative ointment. Because if you apply Vishnevsky’s warming tar-laxative ointment to a contaminated gunshot wound, this will guarantee gangrene, since the oil base of the ointment deprives the wound of oxygen and provides the best conditions for the development of an anaerobic, oxygen-free, gangrene infection.
When old Vishnevsky died, his ointment was used to increase inflammation, because it was obvious to everyone that it caused only harm. Namely, Vishnevsky ointment began to be used for the maturation of purulent boils. This in itself was an indicative change in the use of Vishnevsky ointment.
A boil is an abscess located inside the skin. The boil is reliably limited by the thickness of the skin from the subcutaneous tissue, and therefore boils are always local, intradermal abscesses that never turn into spreading purulent phlegmons. For boils, warming ointments can be used, since due to the anatomical location of the boil inside the skin, we are not afraid of the spread of the purulent process.
The use of Vishnevsky ointment for boils gives a warming effect and the so-called “ripening” effect, that is, the rapid suppuration of the boil. And since the boil suppurates faster, it is expelled faster, that is, it goes away completely, since the boil never turns into a widespread purulent process. Therefore, the use of Vishnevsky’s warming ointment for boils leads to rapid suppuration, purulence and recovery from intradermal abscess.
To ripen boils - with the same effect as Vishnevsky's ointment - use a warming agent with the same effect ichthyol ointment- a product of distillation of shale tar.
Academician Vishnevsky was a despot in Soviet medicine. They feared him like fire, they knew that he loved to have only his methods used, and therefore, during his life and for a long time after, under his son, and especially during the Great Patriotic War, Vishnevsky’s ointment was applied to wounds at all periods of the wound process, including in the first and second acute periods of the wound process.
In Soviet military hospitals, Vishnevsky ointment was immediately applied to all wounds during the initial cleaning and treatment of the wound. Therefore, the wounds of Soviet soldiers often ended in gangrene.
You all know very well that the return of a Soviet soldier to his unit is a little celebrated event in Soviet fiction and memoirs. Whereas gangrene is a frequently encountered word in Soviet military fiction and memoirs. Don't remember the famous "Ballad of Gangrene" in the novel by the classics of Jewish black humor Ilf and Petrov - "The Twelve Chairs"?
The Germans only had to hit a Soviet soldier and wound him - then he was finished off with Vishnevsky’s ointment and the rest of the “lotions” of medical treatment of the wounded in Soviet medicine. During that same war, however, there were no cases of gangrene among Americans, and the word does not appear in American war memoirs. The secret is simple - the Americans never treated wounds with warming ointments like Vishnevsky’s ointment, and it never occurred to them to export this “wonderful” laxative-tar ointment from the Russian allies, which was falsely called “Vishnevsky’s balm” in Soviet literature.
The Americans never used any ointments at all - only surgical debridement, cleaning, washing the wound with an antiseptic, wide excision of dead tissue, antibiotics and that’s it. This approach provided a 96% cure rate against almost 90% of deaths in the “outstanding Soviet surgery”, where such outstanding surgeons as the father and son Vishnevsky and their accomplices worked “selflessly”.
Because in fact, the Soviet and American armies were approximately equal in size, and fought for the same duration. The American army fought from December 8, 1941 to September 1945 and fought not with anyone, but, as we now know, with kamikazes and black belts in karate. The Vishnevsky family and their associates and accomplices were, in the full sense of the word, a holocaust for the Soviet people. Their name is associated with the medical genocide of the Soviet people. The lives of millions of Soviet wounded during the Great Patriotic War and in the post-war period are the result of the sabotage activities of the crypto-Jew Alexander Vasilyevich Vishnevsky and his accomplices.
It is doubtful that they only smeared the goyim with their “Vishnevsky balm,” but, as they say, “if there is such a drunkenness, cut the last cucumber,” “if you beat the goyim, do not spare the Jews.” Only in the sixties were Soviet surgeons able to recklessly refuse to use Vishnevsky ointment in the acute period of wound management. But the epidemic of gangrene caused by Vishnevsky’s ointment was not the only type of sabotage launched by the sabotage doctor Alexander Vasilyevich Vishnevsky.
Another type of sabotage and hidden method mass genocide, which caused enormous damage not only to the soldiers of the Soviet army, but also to the entire Soviet people, was complete ban on the use of general anesthesia in Soviet medicine and military surgery. Around the beginning of the thirties, Academician Vishnevsky introduced the total use of local anesthesia with novocaine into practice and, in connection with this, generally banned the use of general anesthesia in surgery in the USSR, declaring that his method of local novocaine injections was the best anesthesia in the world.
Over the next 30 years, all operations in the USSR will be performed only under local anesthesia, regardless of the severity of the operation. The use of local anesthesia for local operations such as opening a boil, reducing a dislocation or pulling out a tooth is quite normal. However, Academician Vishnevsky forced all Soviet medicine to perform heavy abdominal operations under local anesthesia, such as removal of the stomach, lung, and craniotomy.
All amputations of limbs and abdominal operations for penetrating wounds of the chest and abdominal cavity during the war were carried out in best case scenario under local anesthesia with novocaine, or even in general, as people gloomily joked, “under crycaine.” Many wounded died from painful shock. At this time, in American medicine, the use of general anesthesia had reached perfection, and the wounded did not feel anything during operations and did not die from painful shock, like the Soviet wounded.
Studying in medical institute, the author of these lines heard a true story from a teacher in anesthesiology, whom I will mention later, that in the late 50s, during the first American exhibition, a delegation of American doctors visited Moscow. The Americans carried out several demonstration operations. In response to this, Soviet surgeons, who were then under the leadership of Alexander Alexandrovich Vishnevsky (son), showed " high degree development of Soviet surgery", demonstrating to the Americans the removal of a lung under local anesthesia, that is, from a patient who was in full and clear consciousness. Having looked at this, the American surgeons expressed their undisguised admiration. They said: "Only a real communist can endure such an operation under local anesthesia ! Bravissimo and Viva to the patient’s courage!”
Only from the beginning of the 60s did general anesthesia begin to slowly return to Soviet clinical practice. The son of the pest surgeon Alexander Vasilyevich Vishnevsky, Alexander Alexandrovich Vishnevsky (1906-1975), was the chief surgeon of the USSR from the death of his father, that is, from 1948 to 1975, and all these years the practice of dominance of Vishnevsky ointment and local anesthesia continued to dominate Soviet surgery.
Here is the official certificate about A.A. Vishnevsky (son) from the Internet: Vishnevsky Alexander Alexandrovich, Soviet surgeon, Colonel General of the Medical Service (1963), Academician of the USSR Academy of Medical Sciences (1957), Hero of Socialist Labor (1966). In the Soviet Army in 1931-1933, 1939-40 and from 1941. He graduated from the medical faculty of Kazan University (1929), taught first there, and in 1931-33 at Military Medical Academy Red Army, then at scientific and clinical work. From 1939 he headed the surgical department of the All-Union Institute of Experimental Medicine. During the battles on the river. Khalkhin Gol in 1939 consultant surgeon of the 1st Army Group. During the Great Patriotic War, he was an army surgeon and the chief surgeon of a number of fronts. Developed and implemented effective methods for treating gunshot wounds. After the war, chief surgeon of the Primorsky Military District, then the Moscow Military District. Since 1948, director of the Institute of Surgery named after. A.V. Vishnevsky, at the same time since 1956, chief surgeon of the USSR Ministry of Defense. In 1953, for the first time in the world, V. performed heart surgery under local anesthesia, and in 1957, a successful “open heart” operation using domestic methods. art apparatus, blood circulation. He was engaged in the treatment of burns, remote diagnostics and prognosis using a computer. Author of more than 200 works. Lenin Prize (1960), USSR State Prize (1970). Laureate of the International Prize named after. R. Leriche (1955). Chairman of the All-Russian Society of Surgeons, member of the International Association of Surgeons, honorary member of many Soviet and foreign scientific surgical and medical societies. V. was awarded 3 Orders of Lenin, 4 Orders of the Red Banner, 2 Orders of the Patriotic War 1st class, 2 Orders of the Red Star, Order “For Service to the Motherland in the Armed Forces of the USSR” 3rd class, medals, as well as foreign orders. As you can see, foreign colleagues appreciated Vishnevsky’s sabotage activities. From 1948, from the death of his father, to 1975, the year of his death, A.A. Vishnevsky reigned supreme in Soviet surgery for 30 years.
Please note: the official record states that he even performed heart surgery under local anesthesia. This is outright sadism. What happened to the patient? Why is he sick?! But in the encyclopedia they now write: “In 1953, for the first time in the world, V. performed heart surgery under local anesthesia,” that is, on a patient who was in clear consciousness. It's the same as quartering under local anesthesia. Were all his patients goyim? ...But this, too, was not the only type of sabotage and hidden genocide, which was introduced by the father and son Vishnevsky into the practice of Soviet not only military field, but also surgery in general, and which sent even more patients to the next world than the first two , since this type of sabotage continues in Russia to this day.
We are talking about surgical operations for surgical diseases of the abdominal cavity. You'll quickly understand what's going on. The most dangerous complication of abdominal surgery is diffuse purulent peritonitis. Why is he dangerous? Because total area The abdominal mucosa covering 12 meters of intestines is equal to the area of ​​a small living room. Therefore, if the purulent process spreads over the entire vast area of ​​the abdominal cavity, then this is the end. With all processes in the abdominal cavity, the body first of all strives to limit inflammation in the abdominal cavity to only a small area. The body does this by releasing a substance called fibrin when any area of ​​the abdominal cavity becomes inflamed, which hermetically seals off the inflamed area of ​​the abdominal cavity, preventing inflammation from spreading throughout the abdominal cavity. In the USA, all abdominal operations are accompanied by strong preoperative preparation with antibiotics.
Antibiotics are given a couple of days before surgery, either intramuscularly or in tablet form, to disinfect the intestinal contents. In addition, before the operation the patient is given four liters of a special hypertonic drink. saline solution called "Golightly" and make cleansing solutions to completely cleanse the intestines from top to bottom. In the USA, operations on the abdominal cavity always ended and end with suturing tightly, while no tubes are left in the stomach and, moreover, nothing is poured into the stomach through holes in the stomach. Working in many hospitals in the USA, I have never seen diffuse purulent peritonitis, which in the USSR and Russia ends not only with appendicitis, but also, incredible as it may seem, with craniotomy. In US surgery, diffuse peritonitis is extremely rare.
Having personally worked in several American hospitals, I had never even heard of such a complication. In the USSR, as well as in present-day Russia and Ukraine, diffuse purulent peritonitis is a scourge from which at least tens of millions of surgical patients have died.
This genocide of the population continues to this day. The method of medical genocide of the population through the development of purulent peritonitis was developed under the leadership of Alexander Vasilyevich Vishnevsky by his students, including his son Alexander Alexandrovich Vishnevsky and Jewish professor Vasily Yakovlevich Shlapobersky, author of the monograph “Acute purulent peritonitis” (Medgiz, 1958). They developed a technique for abdominal operations, which they complete by leaving rubber tubes in the abdominal cavity. They leave about 12 tubes (they call this “making a hedgehog”), through which a sterile aqueous solution is supplied into the abdominal cavity, which washes out all the fibrin from the abdominal cavity, effectively turning any local inflammation of the abdominal cavity into diffuse purulent peritonitis.
The author of these lines, working in the late 70s and 80s in surgical clinics in Moscow, observed this genocide in “progress” with his own eyes. It was impossible to object to the Jewish medical authorities, because they were the authorities, they were the “experts”. All the chief surgeons of that time, namely the Minister of Health Petrovsky and the chief surgeon of the Fourth Directorate Mayat, were Jews, and, it seems, they quite consciously “protected” the conduct of abdominal operations using sabotage methods. How many times have I noticed that the treatment of others clinical conditions in the USSR it was carried out using methods that necessarily gave the worst results. When I got to the USA and got acquainted with the methods used there, I was simply stunned: why is everything (treatment, operations) done according to the mind, but in the USSR everything is done in the worst possible way? I could not understand this even more because in both the USSR and the USA, 90 percent of doctors and surgeons were Soviet and, accordingly, American Jews.
Why did the same Jews in the USA do everything sensibly, but in the USSR - in the worst possible way? And I can’t find any other explanation except that in the USA they charge crazy amounts of money for everything, and they don’t need to sabotage their results, while in the USSR medicine was free, and this freeness infuriated the Jews so much that they sabotaged all free healthcare as soon as possible. Free healthcare was contrary to Jewish nature.
I will say objectively, not all Soviet Jewish doctors were engaged in sabotage of free medicine; there were also honest workers who were offended by what was happening. But they also could not understand the reasons for the obvious sabotage of medical care in the USSR. But those Jews who themselves were not involved in hidden sabotage could not prevent this sabotage in any way, and they had no choice but to cooperate with the saboteurs, which, in fact, continues to this day. The highest policy in Soviet medicine has always been carried out precisely by Jewish pest doctors, who were, are and will always be, because looting is the most effective method making a profit: take from a sick person - take from a deceased person, take from a corpse.
And this, again, is not the entire list of “services” provided by the Vishnevsky family to the Soviet people and military field surgery. Even before the war, the work of the English physiologist Walter Cannon substantiated and introduced in the West the treatment of blood loss and traumatic shock with intravenous transfusion of lightly salted aqueous solution, called "saline solution". Until now, this “saline solution” or its modification called “Ringer’s solution” is the most effective solution, which is still administered in US clinics in 99% of all cases that are administered intravenously. Already during World War II, Americans always had on hand saline solution and disposable sterile systems for intravenous transfusion of saline solution, which was no more expensive than ordinary water. With the possible exception of fatal bleeding, virtually all of the American wounded were saved.
It was not at all like that in the USSR. Alexander Vasilyevich Vishnevsky effectively blocked the use of saline in the Soviet Army and medicine - in such a way that back in the 80s of the twentieth century, forty years after the war, disposable sterile systems for intravenous infusion were largely absent in the USSR. As for the Patriotic War, due to the lack of disposable systems for transfusion of saline (which even then, even with slight blood loss, were necessarily used by the Americans), the majority of Soviet soldiers died even before getting to the hospital.
And those wounded who did survive to reach the Soviet hospital had little chance of surviving the “treatment” there. Even from films about the Great Patriotic War, you can remember that no IVs were used in Soviet medicine during the war. In the USA, IVs were the standard of treatment back in the 30s, and in the attachment I will show you the relevant documents. And here is data from the American website “Combat Medics WWII”: “During the American Civil War (mid-19th century), the mortality rate among the wounded in hospitals was 50%, in the First World War - 8%, and in World War II - 4%." In the book of the American Arturo Castiglioni, A History of Medicine, New York 1947, in the section "Military Medicine" on page 1079, the following is said about American wounded: "Out of every 100 wounded, 97 survived, and 70 returned to their unit to their previous duties. This excellent result was achieved thanks to the widespread introduction into practice of intravenous transfusion of saline and blood as early as possible, pressure bandages for burns, wide excision of necrotic tissue during primary surgical treatment of wounds, early administration of antibiotics: penicillin and sulfonamide drugs, the use of X-rays in field hospitals, often - right behind the battlefield, as well as the practice of rapid evacuation, often by plane. Of the heaviest contingent (wounded in the stomach), 75% of the wounded with open wounds of the abdominal cavity were saved, while less than half were saved in the First World War.
Head and chest wounds have also shown a corresponding decrease in mortality since the First World War (Kirk - from 15% to 50%). Transected nerves, after rapid suturing, healed in the vast majority of cases without any loss of function. Severance of genitals from booby traps was a new type of injury. A large contingent of the wounded were burn wounded and blast wounded. Much attention was paid to physiotherapeutic rehabilitation of the wounded. Specialists in orthopedics (restoration of limb function) were located in all hospitals. As for the scourge of the First World War - “shell shock” (that is, mental or “combat” shock), manifested on the battlefield by a mental state close to madness, its serious consequences were prevented by psychotherapy in a semi-anesthetized state - in such a way that the majority of shell-shocked, then those in a state of mental shock quickly returned to active service.
The military medical service of the American army included 50 thousand doctors, 90 thousand nurses and about 400 thousand volunteer orderlies. Each soldier had with him an individual emergency package, which contained: dry rations, a pack of sulfonamide (an antibiotic), a syringe with morphine (an anesthetic drug)... Particularly indicative were the statistics of the British Military Medical Service in the Second World War, which showed a decrease in mortality and physical defects compared to the First World War from 12 to 60%, depending on the nature of the injuries."
The above paragraph summarizes the whole essence of military field treatment of the wounded, which even now is not in Russia at the level at which it was in the American army during World War II. Now let’s compare the official casualty figures in the US Army and the USSR Army. But first, I want to ask everyone interested in that war one single question: why did the Soviet and American troops, who defeated the enemy and met on the Elbe, fight two different wars? The USA fought the Second World War, and the USSR fought the Great Patriotic War? It turns out that someone very much did not want to emphasize the fact that the USSR was an ally of the USA and England and the striking force of the American coalition on Eastern Front- just as now Ukraine, Poland and Bulgaria are part of the American coalition in aggression against Iraq and Afghanistan.
The official figure for American Army casualties from 1941 to September 2, 1945. The Wikipedia encyclopedia gives the following figures for the United States: 16 million Americans were drafted into the army and about 400 thousand died. How many losses are there in the Soviet Army? The Wikipedia encyclopedia gives the following figures: of the 23 million victims in the USSR, over 12 million were civilians. But, thus, we are left with 11 million dead Soviet soldiers and officers of the Soviet army. Such a discrepancy in the losses of two armies of approximately equal size over approximately same time military operations - 22 times - does not fit into any reasonable explanation. And there is no need to attribute the huge discrepancy in losses (more than 22 times) to some German snipers, the superiority of German weapons or the mythical, propaganda “atrocities of the Nazi occupiers” on the territory of the country. If we discard propaganda cases, then accurate data will show that the Germans did not fight with the civilian population of the USSR. Let's leave the chatter to non-specialists. There is also no need to repeat the nonsense that the Americans allegedly fought only since 1944. It's a lie. The United States officially entered the war on December 8, 1941, and for the first two years American troops fought fierce, bloody battles with the Japanese, landing in Europe as early as 1943 in Italy. One can just as easily blame the USSR for not opening a second front with Japan in the East until 1945. The Americans fought until September 1945. The Americans also had their own complications with the Japanese - remember, for example, the famous and effective Japanese “kamikazes”.
Let's leave all propaganda tricks for demagogues. After so many years, we can and even should analyze the numbers impartially. At the same time, it was the Anglo-American troops who carried out a particularly vulnerable and dangerous in terms of losses landing operation from the sea on the French coast, when there was a danger that they would all be killed during the landing. And only the betrayal of Hitler’s own generals allowed the Anglo-Americans to land in France. If General Rommel's plan (a massive attack on the Anglo-American troops during their landing) had been put into action, and not the treacherous plan of the traitor General Gerd von Rundstedt (to dig in far from the coast), then the Anglo-American troops would have been destroyed back in sea. So why during the same time, from 1941 to 1945, the losses of the American army were 400 thousand, and the losses of the Soviet army were 11 million people?
And now, so that you are truly amazed, I will give you figures from the textbook of military field surgery of the general of the medical service, the chief surgeon of several fronts, the Jew Nikolai Nikolaevich Elansky: “The exceptional severity of the lesions, causing fatal outcome on the battlefield, on average, in 20% of cases for the total number of wounded - the so-called "irretrievable losses" - and in subsequent stages from the number of so-called "sanitary losses" for some types of wounds up to 60-70% of cases."
Thus, the Soviet percentage of casualties was as follows: 20% of the wounded died right on the battlefield. Then they were transported, and subsequently another 60-70% of the wounded died, which is 80-90% of all wounded. Even if we interpret Elansky’s figures in the sense that only 60-70% died, then this, as can be seen from the above figures, exceeds the percentage of losses of American wounded during their Civil War in the middle of the 19th century.
That's right, this was the middle of the 19th century - a time when such concepts as sterilization and sterility in surgery were generally absent in medicine. That is, the use of Vishnevsky’s ointment and other “outstanding methods” of “selfless” Soviet killers in white coats had an effect even worse than the lack of sterilization and sterility in surgery of the nineteenth century.
To camouflage the obvious sabotage, after the war in the USSR a huge exculpatory “work” was published - “Experience Soviet medicine during the Great Patriotic War", in as many as 35 volumes. These 35 volumes are a list of particularly significant cases, medical histories of individual wounded people and long rants about the organization of the deployment of military hospitals, but not at all about how to properly provide medical care.
This huge collection of volumes had one, or rather two, goals: to testify to the “tremendous achievements of Soviet medicine during the Great Patriotic War” and to cover up those crimes, the genocide that was committed against the Soviet wounded by the Jewish medical leadership of Soviet military medicine.
Please note that the book by the Jew N.N. Elansky was written under the editorship of two more Jews: Lieutenant General. honey. service of S.S. Girgolav, and Major General Med. services prof. V. S. Levit. Please note that all authors on military field surgery (like the vast majority of authors in other fields of medicine) are Jews, such as, for example, the same Boris Vasilyevich Petrovsky: “Selected lectures on military surgery (military field and military urban surgery )". Petrovsky B.V. Medicine. 1998. And here is the manual of Vishnevsky himself: Vishnevsky A. A., Shreiber M. I., Military field surgery, 2nd ed., M., 1968. A book on the history of military field surgery during the war years was also written by two Jews: “Military field surgery during the Great Patriotic War”, I. V. Aleksanyan, M. Sh. Knopov, Medicine Publishing House, 2000.
The chief surgeon of the Soviet Army during the Great Patriotic War was Nikolai Nilovich Burdenko, a man from the photo who is not clearly Jewish, but not of Slavic appearance. Nikolai Nilovich Burdenko was one of the members of the famous public commission that “proved” that Polish officers were shot by the Germans in Katyn.
Moreover, Burdenko, since he was also the President of the Academy of Medical Sciences of the USSR (and a person in such a position could not possibly be Russian), was also the head of this commission, designed to cover up the traces of the genocide of the Poles. Unofficially, this commission was called the “Burdenko Commission.” An interesting fact from Burdenko’s biography is that after school he entered a theological seminary, then ended up at Tomsk University, from which he was quickly expelled for, as they would now say, terrorist activities. Look at the official material from Wikipedia about the evidence of the execution of 15 thousand Polish officers by the Beria NKVD:.
And now, in light of this, evaluate Burdenko at least as a person who was well aware that some corpses from Katyn forest They took us in cars to Moscow, to the Institute of Forensic Medicine. This institute was then located in a building demolished before the Olympics on the Garden Ring near the Mayakovskaya metro station. And so that no one would spy, right there, on the floor, they were shot from German machine guns. This fact was personally told to me by a member of the “old Bolshevik” family, who himself did not work there, but it was no secret among the Moscow elite of that time. In the Katyn Commission, half of the members were foreign figures: the daughter of the American ambassador, the Jew Harriman, the correspondent of the Jewish newspaper "New York Times", the opportunistic writer and crypto-Jew Alexey Tolstoy, Metropolitan Nikoliy of Kiev and Galicia, People's Commissar of Education Potemkin and many other odious persons, including ours The Chief Surgeon of the Soviet Army, Nikolai Nilovich Burdenko, about whom this book of memoirs says the following: “Professor Burdenko, wearing a green border guard cap, was busily dissecting corpses and, waving a piece of fetid liver attached to the tip of his scalpel, said: “Look how fresh it is!” , that is, he tried to prove that the Poles were shot by the Germans who had just retreated."
It was this contingent of Jewish sabotage doctors who supervised “dedicated medical care for wounded Soviet soldiers and officers,” but in reality, outright sabotage, sabotage and medical genocide of the population of the USSR, expressed in the enormous discrepancy between American and Soviet losses among the wounded. And after the murder of Stalin, they still proved that there were no Jewish doctors who were saboteurs, although even at Bukharin’s trial, Jewish doctors who were saboteurs themselves, in the presence of foreign correspondents, admitted that they existed.
Among the factors that caused the disproportionate losses of Soviet soldiers among the wounded, without a doubt, included the medical policy of the main leaders of Soviet surgery at that time: the chief surgeon of the USSR, academician A.V. Vishnevsky and his son A.A. Vishnevsky, the chief surgeon of the fronts, who proclaimed that Vishnevsky’s treatment is the best in the world, namely: the administration of novocaine treats any blood loss and any shock, Vishnevsky’s ointment replaces any antibiotic, and the same novocaine injections are better than general anesthesia. If you open this website, you will see that an American soldier is receiving medical care from his own comrades, fellow soldiers. Pay attention to the photo on the first page of the site, where two ordinary American soldiers apply a disposable IV, while there were no IVs in Soviet hospitals until the 60s. And on another website, look at photographs and a complete model of the functioning of a typical American army hospital.
Please note that they even had X-ray machines in the tent hospital. All American soldiers were taught, and are still taught, to provide medical care on the battlefield. Soviet soldiers were never taught this. The author of these lines knows this well, since he served part of his service as a medical instructor in a motorized rifle regiment in the early 1970s.
In the Russian army, soldiers are not even trained to provide medical care. At the same time, every American soldier is automatically trained to do to his wounded comrade right on the battlefield: intramuscular injection morphine for pain relief, intramuscular injection antitetanus serum, knows how to place a disposable dropper, fills the wound with an antiseptic solution and bandages the wound, in case of a fracture, applies a splint and ensures the evacuation of the wounded, and also gives an antibiotic injection.
Now consider the provision of medical care in the American army directly on the battlefield, described on the same website: “At a distance of only 300-400 meters from the battle line there is a medical aid station. It does not contain any beds. It is only a transit point. Immediately after receiving a message from the battle line, a stretcher is immediately given. At this time, the wounded person has already been given morphine, antibiotics have been applied, a bandage has been applied, and the bleeding has been stopped. The stretcher arrives in time and is carried to a distance where the jeep can drive up so that he himself is not hit. this is a distance from ten meters to one kilometer, and at this distance there is already a medical aid station with a doctor.
The doctor removes the primary bandage, makes a diagnosis, administers morphine and sets up an intravenous infusion system, and then takes the necessary measures to calm the wounded and create comfort for him, that is, puts him in order: warms him up or puts ice on him, gives him coffee or tea to drink. An ambulance then arrives and takes the wounded man to the operating room location. This place is located even further in the rear, well equipped and equipped with everything necessary, including an X-ray machine. An operation is performed here, and then the wounded person is evacuated to a rear hospital. At this stage, the wounded are also not lying, they are only lying in the rear hospital. At the stage of the primary station, behind the battlefield and at the location of the operating room, patients are only in transit." Is it clear how medical care is organized on the battlefield of the American army? There are no questions, everything is clear and understandable - one paragraph. And in the appendix I will give to you the most confusing instructions for providing military field medical care in today's Russian army, in which neither you, nor even me and no one in general can understand anything. Thus, medical family Vishnevsky, which also included the grandson of Alexander Vishnevsky, a professor at the Institute of Surgery named after. Vishnevsky Vishnevsky, for a long time blocked all methods that ensure the salvation of the wounded.
These are methods such as the use of anesthesia and antibiotics, intravenous infusion of saline as a blood substitute, as well as general anesthesia, which were immediately adopted by the American army and medicine and turned out to be the basis for the correct treatment of patients and wounded, ensuring 96% recovery of the wounded.
How can you imagine such a huge difference in the losses of two armies of approximately equal strength, fighting at the same time against the same enemy - 400 thousand killed American soldiers and 11 million killed Soviet soldiers? This is a colossal difference in losses, which cannot be explained by anything other than the deliberate sabotage of medical care for the Soviet wounded and the medical genocide of the Soviet people.
The question remains open: how many millions of lives of Soviet soldiers could have been saved if, with 60-90% of the losses of the wounded, according to N.N. Elansky. could it be possible to drop to 4% of losses of the total number of wounded, as in the American army? Why were all these deadly forceful “treatments” introduced and maintained for decades, despite all the evidence of their murderous practices? Thousands of Soviet doctors, including Jews, were silenced and lost their jobs for expressing doubts about the use, to put it mildly, of methods that gave obvious negative results.
I emphasize this so that the Jews themselves will notice that when such things are launched into medical practice medical methods total destruction of people, there is no way to protect the “chosen” race of the Jews themselves from them. Of course, due to the smaller proportion of Jews among the total population of the USSR, the majority of those killed were non-Jews.
However, a certain percentage of Jews also have to be sacrificed, since Jews experience the same deadly consequences of using on themselves the sophisticated methods of exterminating the goyim used by their especially sophisticated fellow tribesmen. How many times have I had to announce to Jewish close relatives that their loved ones died during or after surgery! I couldn't tell them what I can now put on paper.
Annex 1. Look at the instructions for organizing medical care in today's Russian army, if you understand anything at all. Who needs such instructions? Instructions for Russian military field assistance: .
2. And here is some data from the Australian Museum of Medical History about when intravenous transfusion of blood and saline solution was introduced into medical practice, as well as into military field surgery: The standard system for intravenous transfusion of saline solution was introduced into practice back in the 20s years. In the 30s, another system for transfusion of saline and blood was developed - “Solyuvak”.
http://zarubezhom.com/wishnevsky.htm

Previously, Vishnevsky ointment was an indispensable attribute home first aid kit and was used constantly. It was used to treat bruises, small cuts, painful abscesses, boils - any injuries and sores were successfully treated with ointment. And then, suddenly, it was banned.

Modern medicine strongly opposes Vishnevsky’s ointment, not recognizing it as a remedy. The ointment was invented by a Russian doctor and it was used only in Russia, nowhere else. Dr. Vishnevsky developed the composition of the product a long time ago, in the pre-war years. And he introduced the ointment as an effective antiseptic and stimulator of healing against purulent wounds. Vishnevsky himself was the son of the then Minister of Health in the USSR. The composition of the ointment is quite simple: birch tar and animal fat base.

During the war, field hospitals used the product constantly, because there were no analogues that could replace it. If there were, it was clearly in insufficient quantities.

Later, in peacetime, post-war times, doctors argued: it was time to leave Vishnevsky’s ointment behind. Professor L.A. was especially specific. Blatun, who worked at the Institute of Surgery of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. He wrote that regular use of the product is unlawful due to the development of complications, in addition, the effectiveness of the ointment has not been proven.

The mechanism of action of the ointment is simple: it covers the wound with a thin airtight film, this stimulates the natural heating of the tissue and the gradual drawing out of pus. However, heating still created a favorable environment for rapid growth and the proliferation of microbes inside, under the layer formed by the ointment. Which entailed numerous complications, sometimes leading to the development of gangrene.

Doctors believe that Vishnevsky ointment does not provide an analgesic or anti-edematous effect; on the contrary, it aggravates internal inflammatory processes occurring in diabetic ulcerations. It can cause dangerous bleeding and other serious consequences, even cancer.

Alexey Mospanov, a surgeon, is sure: “Vishnevsky ointment is an outdated remedy, last century. Causes more complications than therapeutic effect. If the ointment is prescribed by a doctor, it is better to change the specialist. It’s hard for me to name a drug worse than her.”

However, contrary to the opinion of colleagues, many doctors still believe in the effectiveness of the ointment and prescribe it against a number of diseases. They are trying to treat hemorrhoids, various lesions of the intestinal mucosa, painful boils and other similar diseases. The ointment should not be used for mastitis, various gynecological diseases, fistulas, arthrosis, arthritis, abscesses, allergies, diathesis, injuries... the list is endless. It’s easier to say that there is no disease that can be treated with this ointment.

The wonderful portal warspot.ru, in addition to very interesting military historical materials, sometimes publishes cool materials on the history of military medicine. We have already published two reviews of him, and now we are publishing an excellent biographical article about the legendary military medic Alexander Vasilyevich Vishnevsky, adding a few photographs to it.

At the beginning of a medical career

Alexander Vasilyevich Vishnevsky was born on August 23 (September 4, new style) 1874 in the distant Dagestan village of Chir-Yurt in the family of a staff captain of the 82nd Dagestan Infantry Regiment. His father, Vasily Vasilyevich, came from “the children of clerks” and was originally from Saratov. How did he get to the Dagestan region? At the age of 17, Vasily Vishnevsky staged a “rebellion” against the school authorities in his gymnasium, for which he was exiled as a soldier to the Caucasus.

Alexander moved a lot among soldiers, so he was familiar with military affairs first-hand. He left his father's house early and studied first in Astrakhan and then at Kazan University. Many prominent scientists became Vishnevsky's teachers. He followed the precepts of the father of military field surgery N.I. Pirogov, who said: “There is no medicine without surgery and no surgery without anatomy.” Therefore, Vishnevsky paid great attention to theoretical training and the study of anatomy and physiology.
Fate connected Vishnevsky with Kazan University for a long time. He graduated from this educational institution in 1899, after which he worked there for another 35 years. He combined lecturing at the university with working in several hospitals at once.

Vishnevsky is operating. 1929

The “early” Vishnevsky had to do especially a lot of work during the Civil War, when the typhus epidemic was raging and there were up to 20 people per doctor per day. It was on the initiative of the future that the luminaries of surgery at the Faculty of Medicine of Kazan University began to teach a special course on infectious diseases.

Vishnevsky became a truly famous physician in the 20–40s. In 1935 he became head surgical clinics All-Union Institute of Experimental Medicine and Central GIDUV in Moscow and held this position until 1947.

Bath for the nerve

Alexander Vishnevsky is remembered by the general public as the creator of the famous medicinal ointment. However, its use is only part of a completely new method for treating Vishnevsky’s wounds at that time. Alexander Vasilyevich took a completely different look at the practice of surgery itself, which ran counter to established views. The main question concerned methods of pain relief and combating shock, which is especially important in military field surgery, and only then the new approach changed the very principle of treating wounds, where the famous ointment came onto the scene.

In the history of pain management during surgical interventions, one can find some rather unusual examples. In ancient times, healers used mandrake root (in Asia and Africa), wine (in the medical practice of Hippocrates and even many centuries later with N.I. Pirogov) and other alcohol, bloodletting until fainting, pressing the carotid arteries and even "magnetic sleep" caused by hypnosis. Subsequently, ether (for the first time since 1846 for tooth extraction), nitrous oxide (“laughing gas”) and chloroform were used to artificially induce sleep. During the First World War, general anesthesia was almost the only method of pain relief for military surgeons.

Partial anesthesia has also been known since ancient times. For this they used crocodile fat (in Egypt), ground marble mixed with vinegar (it was released carbon dioxide and cooled the tissue), circular compression (especially for amputations). Since 1884, they tried to carry out local anesthesia with cocaine, then with its solution. This is how infiltration anesthesia appeared.

Vishnevsky operates

By the 30s of the 20th century, doctors were familiar with at least 20 methods of local anesthesia, and all of them were not ideal. It was believed that in war it was worth using local anesthesia only in 25–35% of cases, but anesthesia in 75–65% of cases. The majority of Soviet surgeons held the same opinion even before the Great Patriotic War. But to carry out the operation under general anesthesia, special assistants are required, and medical personnel are used, which are so scarce in the conditions of a major war. Then the fighter still needs to come out of anesthesia, and this entails worries in the post-anesthesia period, lengthening the time of stay in the hospital, complications could arise.

Vishnevsky instruments

Vishnevsky considered local anesthesia to be the most effective and safe method. He saved the most important thing - time. The teachings of the old school did not come true - during the Second World War, local anesthesia began to be used in almost 70% of cases. It was used for wounds of the extremities, skull, chest and chest cavity. The question remains - what to do with penetrating wounds to the abdomen, which are accompanied by injuries to the abdominal organs? It is worth noting that during the battles at Khalkhin Gol, positive experience was gained in performing operations on those wounded in the abdomen under local anesthesia using the Vishnevsky method. Local anesthesia for prolapsed organs requires, at a minimum, the special skills of a surgeon. As we remember, A.V. Vishnevsky created an entire innovative school of surgeons who had already mastered the method of local anesthesia well, so they were able to carry out professional retraining of surgeons during the war.

The essence of local anesthesia using a special “creeping infiltrate method” is that Vishnevsky tried “not to damage human body away from the operation site." He did not put the person into artificial sleep and did not anesthetize the external tissues with injections, but injected a large amount of warm, weak solution of novocaine into the tissue and blocked the nerve itself that approached the operated area, washing this nerve. For each operation, three liters of novocaine solution were consumed. The son of A.V. Vishnevsky called it a “bath for the nerve.”

Life saving ointment

Even in the middle of the 20th century, the high mortality rate from wounds remained a huge problem both in peacetime and even more so in wartime. People died not only from the damage itself or from blood loss, but from a purulent infection that could quickly spread. Even at the beginning of the Great Patriotic War, surgeons did not completely suture the wounds - they remained slightly open, the bandages were often changed. The surgeon's task was to clear the wound of pus, but it accumulated again.

Vishnevsky proposed something completely different - to completely clean the wound of pus and of all damaged tissue (he cut the wound cavities very deeply), and then ensure a condition in which pus does not form again. Vishnevsky's ointment had a bactericidal effect and had a slight irritating effect inside the wound, which made the nerve endings work. Alexander Vasilyevich even considered any gunshot wound as an infected and then inflammatory focus that must be stopped as soon as possible. It was in the field of purulent surgery that Vishnevsky’s work turned out to be most important; his methods of treating wounds saved the lives of many soldiers.

By the way, at first the surgeon included in his ointment, in addition to xeroform and castor oil, the so-called Peruvian balsam (Balsami Peruviani). This is a folk remedy from South America, used to treat wounds and many other ailments, including even impotence. It has been known in Europe since 1775, it was described by the Swiss physician and scientist A. Haller. But it was based on tropical tree resin - not the most accessible ingredient for the USSR. Then, in 1927, birch tar began to be used instead of Balsami Peruviani. When xeroform was not enough, it was replaced with tincture of iodine. “Balsamic liniment (according to Vishnevsky)” is the full name of this invention. Nowadays, the fight against new generations of bacteria requires other, more modern means, and Vishnevsky ointment is considered obsolete. However, it is still produced.

Presentation of the Order of Lenin to Vishnevsky

In 1942, Vishnevsky received the State Prize, then the Order of Lenin and the Red Banner of Labor. On November 12, 1948, the famous surgeon spoke at a meeting of the Moscow Surgical Society. There he suffered a heart attack, the next day after which Vishnevsky died.

Stamp dedicated to Vishnevsky

Eighteen professors came from the school of A.V. Vishnevsky. The dynasty of doctors he founded was not lost in the shadow of his honored ancestor. His son Alexander, as a consultant surgeon of the 1st Army Group, took part in the fighting at Khalkhin Gol. IN Soviet-Finnish war 1939-1940 he participated as the chief army surgeon of the 9th Army, and later was the chief surgeon of the Volkhov and Karelian fronts in the Great Patriotic War. Subsequently, he received the position of chief surgeon of the USSR Ministry of Defense.

Alexander Alexandrovich Vishnevsky Sr.

Grandson Alexander Alexandrovich Vishnevsky Jr., Doctor of Medical Sciences, who died the year before last, developed one of the prototypes of a modern surgical mechanical suturing device back in the late 1970s. He also became the first to perform operations to reduce the volume of lung tissue for diffuse emphysema and a much less significant for health, but much more popular operation to correct the volume of the mammary gland with silicone implants. He chalked up these achievements while working at the Institute of Surgery, founded by his grandfather.

Alexander Alexandrovich Vishnevsky Jr.

Sources and literature

1. Zakharyan S. T. The creative path of Alexander Vasilyevich Vishnevsky. M.: Medicine, 1973.
2. Rosengarten M. Yu., Albitsky V. Yu. Pages from the life of a surgeon. A.V. Vishnevsky in Kazan. Kazan: Tatar Book Publishing House, 1974.
3. Military field surgery: Textbook / Ed. Prof. E. K. Gumanenko. St. Petersburg: Foliant Publishing House LLC, 2004
4. Sukhomlinov K. Doctors who changed the world. Moscow: Eksmo, 2014
5. Vishnevsky Alexander Vasilievich. // Virtual Museum of the Great Patriotic War of the Republic of Tatarstan
6. Vishnevsky Alexander Alexandrovich (junior) // Medical necropolis
7. Maria Maksimova. The luminary of science. Surgeon Alexander Vishnevsky and his famous discoveries. // Arguments and facts - Kazan, 09/04/2014

You can also follow our blog updates through